So El Gusano got temporarily suspended by The Twitter Thought Police for calling out mouth-breather @CenkUiger (and copying in @axuis & @SpeakerPelosi). That means that @Gus_802 did something right. It also means that Gus was censored and had to Delete-A-Tweet to escape #Twittergulag.
Hey, @Gus_802, come on over. You’d be surprised at what we agree upon, and we won’t eat you. It’s no secret that Cenk Uygur is an ignorant fat sweaty poor excuse for a political commentator, online or offline. He’s Kent “Flounder” Dorfman‘s older brother.
Not sure what El Gusano is cranking about this time, but he’s got a point. No idea what it is, and he doesn’t know either.
Maybe it’s this:
Gus. We’re rooting for you. PLEASE do a weekly podcast.
So El Gusano Pobre complains about being blocked by people “who I never even interacted with.” Hunh.
A quick search through the BRC Archives suggests Gusano may be telling the truth, but he had access to one and he certainly used it. More than one account on that list whose owners never Tweeted to @Gus_802 were instantly blocked from reading his Tweets directly. Did he keep a block list? No. He kept the link and undoubtedly contributed to it.
That list of Twitter accounts was compiled by Furious Burkha in 2012, and comprised those contrarians she deemed unworthy, their followers, and those they followed. With a bigoted algorithm like that I’m amazed that the list didn’t morph into thousands, but then again, she was never the sharpest bulb in the LGF Crayon Box.
Here’s the Pre-Banned List in full regalia [or click here].
El Gusano takes a stroll down Memory Lane.
(Psst… Mr. Hoover/@nicdanger619… she was an ex-porn star… her LGF nic was
Iceweasel Asswhistle… pass it on…)
From his first post at Little Green Footballs to today, El Gusano has been an enigma,. One minute he appears to be un cognoscente, the next minute he’s bashing his head on worn Naugahyde and comes back with a double-barrel load of stupid.
That’s El Gusano’s first comment on Little Green Footballs. For several years after, he proceeded to spam the LGF comments at a rate previously unheard of [60 posts per day average].
But that was then, and this is then, too.
No he didn’t, Gus, and there was no agreement, Gus, but it’s a step in the right direction, Gus. Nothing pleases our Gus because our Gus is a miserable sack of Gus.
Our Gus is an Awesome Gus.
A momentary flash of lucid self-reflection. But he did just retweet one of his patrons’ tweets calling for donations to his Sterno-fund.
Gus, the Architectural exams are tough to pass for a reason (public health and safety) but the medical exams are even tougher for the same reasons. Thank God you’re not a doctor, otherwise all your patients would be like:
Good luck on your GoFundMe foray and we wish you well. We chipped in.
Q: Did your buddy Charles Johnson pitch in?
Gus has a thang going on and somehow he’s Tweeted to thousands, follows thousands, and thousands follow him since he joined Twitter in January 2011. Let’s break this down.
Let’s assume Gus joined Twitter on 31 January 2011. Between that date and 17 July 2017, Gus posted 449,000 Tweets according to his own Twitter Account. That’s about 2,490 days according to this calculator.
Now let’s run the math. 450k Tweets / 2,490 days = 180 Tweets per Day. Assuming a 4 hour Twitterday, that works out to an astounding rate of approximately 45 Tweets per hour average, and it includes the two times he claimed to have quit Twitter.
If Gus is indeed following 3,450 as his Twitterfeed claims, that means he’s reading over 860 Tweets Per Hour. Dude’s amazing.
It’s no secret that Gus is unemployed. He turned down three legitimate offers, and this blog offered to help him out with his medical expenses via a PayPal account. He declined all assistance and chose to gripe instead. So what are those little retweeted things on the lower left of his Twitter homepage? I dunno, Babs, but I do know this. Gus seems to take pride in it.
Gusano, you’re almost as entertaining as Charles Johnson.
What could have been posted in LGF Comment 47, Article 3881 that was so offensive or out of line that would cause Charles to not only delete it, but to block all comments on that Little Green Footballs post from 24 August 2002 from public view? Mr. Paranoia strikes again.
113 Charles Sat, Aug 31, 2002 1:17:13pm
A Disappointed Whiner wrote:
And furthermore, had I asked the question “Do you support allowing people to post obviously bigoted and inflammatory comments about JEWS on this web site?” I can guarantee I would have gotten a very different response out of you.
I had a feeling if I let you go on long enough, eventually your agenda might slip out.
To answer your question, “Do you support allowing people to post obviously bigoted and inflammatory comments about J-E-W-S on this web site?”
Odd that all those embedded links now redirect to the current front page of LGF and that the comment section for that thread is blocked from public view. Wassa talmbout, Johnson?
[Post updated with screencap courtesy of The Boiler Room Crew.]
It is no secret that when a minority wanders off the progressive reservation, Democrats take their white sheets out of the closet. I came across this post at LGF and honestly, I am too angry to comment.