Exposing Poonawalla’s Johnson

Fetched from the RetroBin:

A few years later (2009) Jihad Watch posted this:

I first encountered Aziz Poonawalla during my dialogue of the deaf with the spitting, sputtering hateblogger Dean Esmay, as Poonawalla was and may still be a contributor to his blog. Poonawalla and I also have had several unpleasant exchanges, during which — as you can see if you read them — he didn’t demonstrate an overwhelming commitment of honesty or integrity. —Robert Spencer

Aziz Poonawalla is an anti-semitic muslim propagandist who’s been at it for a while, but that was then and this is now, at least according to Charles Johnson, and something happened. Now they’re best buds.

“Never had any animus…” Charles, you’re a liar. Everyone knows it and we’re here to remind them of your hypocrisy.

Here’s the Tweet, and here’s the lowdown on #RatherGate that exposed Charles Johnson as a fraud.

[LGF Comment screen caps via The Archives, recreated verbatim via The Official BRC Nil Stooge Template™. h/t Rightymouse.]


“Your headline was clickbait bullshit.” –Popehat

Earlier today, Ken White of Popehat.com deftly debunked a leftist meme with a post titled:

No, Trump Didn’t Argue That Protesters Have No Right To Protest or Violated His Rights

Here’s an excerpt:

Ken White of Popehat is a lawyer, and used Johnson’s twisted headline interpretation as an example of one of the most egregious of the misrepresentations of fact, and since he linked directly to Little Green Footballs, he attracted Johnson’s attention. Guess what happened? Read the rest of this entry »


No Effin’ Evidence according to Charles Johnson.

Right, Charles. Although it’s literally true that the pre-election surveillance was not “wiretapping” per se, yet that’s the vernacular term for spying, by whatever means, and it was done illegally via the Obama Administration. Hell, even the left wing media confirmed it.

Charles, how are you benefiting by promoting such easily debunked propaganda? You have to be getting bucks for sucks because no sentient with a soul would post that kinda garbage.


On a lighter note, how about posting a guitar etude or two? Maybe even something you composed yourself. Every single talented guitar player I’ve ever met recorded him/herself playing solo because there’s a big ego involved, like yours.

Post it and we’ll promote it. You have nothing to lose, and it might boost your self-serving GoFundMe account.

Or not.


Then there’s this. Charles threw Little Debbie under the bus.

LOL. Meanwhile:

Keep your heads down, folks. That’s some serious squirrelly.


Should we hug them or make them eat worms? Charles Johnson thinks jihadis need hugs.

Wow. Now Charles Johnson is going after The Gray Lady, aka, The New York Times. Never mind that the NYT states the obvious, that people all over the world are fed up with squishy politicos who allow islamic terrorism to proliferate by rolling their eyes and saying “Can’t we all just get along?” or “We’re all for diversity, no matter the cost,” or more often, “Fuck it. We’re caving.”

Terrorists are essentially cowards, yet they’re still dangerous. The political left seems to think that giving them RC Cola and Little Debbie snack cakes will get them to the poker table, while the political right knows that an enemy won’t negotiate until he’s shoved face down into the sandbox and forced to eat worms.

So, Charles. Would you rather hug a jihadist or make him eat worms? If you’d rather pass on embarrassing yourself, we’ll provide one or more of your archived answers and repost them for you.

[h/t dezes157 & this.]


Charles Johnson Attacks A Dead Man (And It’s Not Breitbart)

Something flew up Charles Johnson’s HooHah recently that got him to post a series of Tweets attacking the late Michael Crichton. Unfortunately, Mr. Crichton isn’t around to defend himself, so he’s an easy target for Mr. Hypocrisy.

Michael Crichton was a successful formulaic novelist who based his themes on research. Many of his novels had similar characters thrown into similar situations with similar challenges, yet they were entertaining. “Jurassic Park” may be his most famous work. My favorite was “Eaters of the Dead,” a retelling of Beowulf with the hypothesis that Grendel was not a dragon but a tribe of mountain Neanderthals carrying torches to drive out the invaders.

In “State of Fear” Crichton used his typical formula for a fast-paced novel, but the Appendices were where the meat was. He included graphs and links to data sites (including NASA) to show that Global Warming was little but promoted hysteria based upon false assumptions. Shortly after SoF was published, NASA took down the referenced links, and subsequent edited copies of the book deleted reference to them. Someone got pantsed.

Now back to Charles Johnson. Why is he suddenly bothering with a novel from ten years ago? He fights with a dead man, offers no evidence to contradict Crichton’s sources, and remains an ignorant blowhard. Charles, your a mess.

P.S. Crichton was interviewed by Charlie Rose in 2007. Worth watching. Jump to 20:00 for the question on Global Warming.


Update: Charles was indeed a fan of Michael Chrichton, as evidenced by his comment on 4 March 2007:

[h/t Octopus. Authentic comment recreated from the text archives via the BRC Nil Stooge Template.]

 


Happy Easter, Charles Johnson.

Ever wonder how many times Charles mentioned Easter in his comments at Little Green Footballs? Well here you go.

From the BRC Archives, we found these wonderful posts:


180 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 11:24:31am
Folks, what we have here is a typical case of lefty role reversal. To divert attention away from the fact that a link to a really nasty personal attack was left on Mudfilter’s front page for several hours — on Easter morning, mind you — it’s now become a matter of the “group think” at LGF. We’re all supposed to be ashamed and I’m supposed to be humble. And even pointing it out is called a bad thing.

Just observe the tactics at work.


197 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 12:12:15pm
cedar: you’re really starting to show your jerk badge.

The “Nuke Mecca crowd,” as you put it, does not appear on the front page.

“A dumb post.” I’m trying to remain level-headed here. But someday I’d like to see how you react if you wake up on a nice Easter morning and find the Mudfilter slimeballs chuckling and patting each other on the back at how clever they are for comparing you to Adolf Hitler’s girlfriend.

In an ugly polka dot dress to boot.

Right, but that’s just “dumb.” Whereas, pointing it out is “shameful, hypocritical, disingenuous,” etc. etc. etc. retch.

That “dumb” post stayed up for almost 6 hours, until I linked to it. I’m pretty sure that if I hadn’t linked to it, it would have remained.

Now go away, you pest.


6 Charles Sun, Mar 23, 2008 10:04:13am

My graphic artist is currently busy being my PHP/Javascript developer, and I’m afraid I don’t have a special Easter graphic.

So what’s Google‘s excuse?


44 Charles Tue, Apr 26, 2011 11:01:22am

re: #35 wrenchwench

Hinderaker had to know that his greeting card source was ludicrous. But he used it anyway.

He probably also knows Obama made a very nice Easter statement — after all, he apparently read my post which contained the video of that statement. But he insisted Obama said “nothing.”

They just lie, blatantly.


117 Charles Tue, Apr 26, 2011 3:38:05pm

re: #116 alexknyc

I may be late on this one but I think Easter 2008 occurred in March.

I’m sure there was nothing proclaimed then either but accuracy does count for something.

Thanks for pointing that out — I added the proclamations for March 2008, and of course there’s no Easter proclamation then either.


24 Charles Tue, Apr 26, 2011 1:39:49pm

re: #19 Obdicut

Obama hates Easter so much he had a prayer breakfast for it.

The bastard.


5 Charles Tue, Apr 26, 2011 2:19:03pm

A Bruce Tomaso notes at Dallas News, not only are there no official Presidential Proclamations for Easter since at least 1980, there don’t appear to be any official proclamations for Muslim holidays either.


Nice reverence, Charles. Now go suck an egg.


Charles Johnson Cuts & Pastes More Unsubstantiated Innuendo

Okay, Charles, let’s go. You posted it.

Yeah. Now what did you leave out of that brilliant piece of cut-n-paste “journalism”, Charles? Did you even read the article from the Washington Post? Did you miss the facts? The innuendo?

During an interview with the Washington Post editorial page staff in March 2016, Trump identified Page, who had previously been an investment banker in Moscow, as a foreign policy adviser to his campaign. Campaign spokeswoman Hope Hicks later described Page’s role as “informal.”

Page has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in his dealings with the Trump campaign or Russia.

“This confirms all of my suspicions about unjustified, politically motivated government surveillance,” Page said in an interview Tuesday. “I have nothing to hide.” He compared surveillance of him to the eavesdropping that the FBI and Justice Department conducted against civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.

Every President in US history, including President Trump, has employed experts with experience dealing with foreign trade partners.  Hell, the United States probably wouldn’t even exist had it not been for Franklin successfully negotiating with DuPont.

Why would the Obama Administration direct the FBI to investigate legal business practices? Okay, that’s a rhetorical question because the answer is obvious.

Does the FBI know that Charles Johnson threatened people with a Mossberg? I’ll bet they do.

Charles, you’re a mess.

P.S. “Tick Tock” is a threat meme used by Anonymous and other splinter vigilante groups. You playing footsie with them again, Charles, or did you make amends with your ex-buddy Barrett Brown?