Charles Johnson plays the “Yes, But” Card, claims Tucker Carlson, his wife and children, and others deserve violent mob harassment.

CNN’s Brian Stelter agreed with Neil Patel that the threats to Tucker Carlson, his wife and children, at their own home, are far beyond peaceful protests, and amounts to domestic terrorism.

Charles Johnson disagrees, and falsely accuses others of doing exactly what he was doing just a few years ago, while citing NO examples.

What a load of crap.

Charles, you yourself doxxed many innocent people who posted regularly on Little Green Footballs in good faith, some of whom even hit your Tip Jar. Because of your doxxing, some came under threats of violence. Hell, Patterico was the victim of a SWATTING attack thanks to you and your doxxing buddies.

Charles, go have a three-way with yourself (assuming your left hand is still in town and your right hand doesn’t have a headache). You’re a two-faced, back-stabbing, vapid, ignorant, obese 65 year-old pony-tailed lying-ass bitch #rumpswab.

Top Stories as of 22 May 2017 10pm PST

Matt Drudge:

Charles F. Johnson:

My, how times have changed.

A Week’s Worth of Little Green Footballs Headlines: What’s Missing?


[Hint: It’s round on the ends and high in the middle.]

Remember When Charles Johnson Had Functioning Brain Cells? Neither Do We.

Daedalus is on a secret fact-finding mission traveling from Ciudad X to Ciudad Y. Many of us are busy in meatworld these days, so unless Mr. Toot, aka “fuckface” aka “The Corpulent One” aka Charles  F. Johnson out-crams himself with his own inane vapidity, we can afford a trip or two down memory lane with some vintage screencaps.

From 20 May 2002:
020520.1 retro chuck
That was posted about 8:10AM. Let’s keep going. About one hour later we got this:
020520.2 retro chuck
Next. 23 minutes later:

020520.3 retro chuck

And eight minutes later, he posted this:020520.4 retro chuck

But Charles Johnson still wasn’t done. Less that a half hour later, he was back at it again.
020520.5 retro chuck

So now he’s wide awake at 10:30AM or so, but it took him over seven hours to pinch off another one.

020520.6 retro chuck

Charles hasn’t changed a bit. He’s only changed the color of his scrunchy.

Charles Johnson Can’t Decide Whose Side He’s On Re: Boston Terrorists

Charles Johnson has been spazzing out for the past few days trying to defend radical islam and find targets to attack (including -surprise- Pamela Geller, Jim Hoft, Glenn Beck and the late Andrew Breitbart). Because the terrorists were self-described radical islamists, Charles just can’t bring himself to call them what they are: MUSLIM TERRORISTS.
Boston Bomber LGF 2

What motivated the terrorists? Really? How ’bout radical islam, Chuck? C’mon, say it.

Only a few hours previously, Charles claimed that conservatives wanted the surviving fugitive terrorist alive in order to torture him for intel.

Boston Bomber LGF 1

Charles you’re rocking now. Please don’t stop.

The principles embodied in the Oath are codified in Section 337(a) in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which provides that all applicants shall take an Oath that incorporates the substance of the following:

1.  Support the Constitution;

2.  Renounce and abjure absolutely and entirely all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which the applicant was before a subject or citizen;

3.  Support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;

4.  Bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and

A. Bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; or

B. Perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; or

C. Perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law.

Update: Conditions for Revocation of US Citizenship

Daedalus Addendum: Charles takes a shot at Pam Geller in a post about the capture of Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

Boston Bomber LGF 2Swipe at Pam 2Swipe at Pam 3

Pam Geller is the center of Charles Johnson’s world.  He ties her to every current event as if she’s responsible for all the world’s ills. The truth is he still can’t get over the fact she has rejected him.

Get a life loser!


Update: It’s a Downding Festival!

Boston Bomber LGF 3

Charles Johnson, Expert in Middle East Terrorism, Exonerates Al Qaeda From U.S. Embassy Attack.

Based upon a report by the well known and respected Conservative Voice of Reason known as the LA Times (authored by Ken Dilanian and Shashank Bengali) and backed up by objective reporting by the NYT, and ignoring surveillance videos, reports by the CIA, first-hand accounts by the military and locals, and other compelling testimony and evidence that the attack that killed non-combatant US Citizens serving on US land abroad due to incompetence by the current administration, it’s intuitively obvious to the casual observer that Charles Johnson is a mess.

Al-Qaeda hasn’t been pinned to the 9/11/12 attacks on the US Embassies yet, but so what. You think they didn’t have a hand in it Charlie? You think the various terrorist groups operate in a vacuum bubble like Little Green Footballs?

We’ll humor you, Chuck. It was just a benign protest in the streets with anti-American flags and puppets that went bad once people showed up to infiltrate a peaceful demonstration about a video that few had seen, with automatic weapons,  RPGs and cans of diesel when there is absolutely no evidence that it went down that way.

Chuck, play us another tune.

Oh, one more thing. That top image with the adverts was a screencap and not photoshopped. Thank you, Charles.

Daedalus Update: Charles Johnson’s latest post links to a story that contradicts his claims al-Qaeda was not involved.

“It was a flash mob with weapons,” is how the senior official described the attackers. The mob included members of the Ansar al-Sharia militia, about four members of al-Qaeda in the Maghreb, and members of the Egypt-based Muhammad Jamal network, along with other unarmed looters.

I thought al-Qaeda was not involved Charles?

[Updated: Revised awkward phrasing and minor typos in the original post. -Briareus]

ProLifeLiberal makes a threat

Charles like to claim violent threats are posted at Conservative websites. Yet, scanning through LGF I found comments calling for violence,. Resident Jihadi ProLifeLiberal was expressing his anger over the Norway shootings. He then makes threats of violence against Conservatives.

Wow, Special treatment! This call for violence should have been removed by Charles. It gets even better. The Online Jihadi will call Conservatives, supporters of terror.

ProLifeLiberal supported AL-Qaeda in Libya and is a fan of the Muslim Brotherhood. For him to accuse other of supporter, is really audacious. Charles Johnson is OK with Terror supporters calling for violence. He should be remind of this next time, he accuses another blog of allowing violent comments.