Charles’ Comment 167 WAS a lie (as proven years later by the BRC) which put his immediate spazdefense comments in question. Comment 168 indicates that he knows he deleted a comment once he became aware of it yet he doesn’t recall it. Regarding Comment 169: remember when Charles denied sending the LGF Flying Monkeys to astroturf the Amazon reviews of Pam Geller’s book? Yeah, like that never happened. (In fact, it never happened twice.) Does anyone really believe Comment 169?
Only behind the fevered forehead of Charles Johnson (nestled in the damp darkness somewhere between his blank black bead-button eyes and his Magical Jazzy Ponytail scrunchie) could this photo be construed as a Pro Nazi Rally, but that’s precisely what he claimed while trying to smear Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit. What exactly is Hoft guilty of? Pulling a Breitbart.
Okay. So radical grampas and grammas and mommies and daddies are neonazis for wanting to prevent the IRS from becoming a US version of Germany’s SS. Got it. So what was Hoft’s “Monumental Fail” that Mr.#Rumpswab refers to? An honest clarification of obvious intent, caught by a Wonkette reader. Original version:
Hunh. That’s a “Monumental Fail” according to someone who is notorious for editing and deleting his own words and those of other years after they were posted on LGF, who claimed he had nothing to do with nicknaming Rachel Corrie “St. Pancake”, who couldn’t identify the State Flags of either Tennessee or Ohio, who can’t tell the difference between a menu board and a laptop, who lied about Brevik’s Manifesto, who honestly claimed Anthony Weiner’s PeniePix as his own, who claimed George Zimmerman wasn’t injured by Trayvon Martin, who supports planting racist comments on rival blogs, who doesn’t know the definition of the word “bogus” or how to pronounce the word “milieu” and who’s been reduced to licking the fetid rump-pus-infections of a blogger known as Wonkette for liberal street cred.
Chuck, you’re a mess.
Update: The inane attack on Hoft continues. Here’s the pertinent part of the DSCC Request For Donations:
The unspoken insinuation is undeniably clear:
The Tea Party is a radical group comprised of neo-nazis.
Jim Hoft’s offer of a reward was poorly worded, but his intent was also undeniably clear:
Prove that the Tea Party supports National Socialism or STFU.
[Update: Added “St. Pancake” to the list of lies, h/t Swamprat.]
I know it’s been almost a year since we slapped CJ with the revelation of the infamous LGF comment #218822 (wherein, contrary to Johnson’s repeated claims over the better part of a decade, he did refer to Rachel Corrie as “Saint Pancake”), but there’s been a bit of a new development, and The Boiler Room has caught him in yet another lie related to the whole episode.
You see, for the longest time, the BRC was unable to dive into the archives and retrieve the comment first hand, since Johnson had cravenly blocked the Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) from his site. Luckily, enough evidence of its original existence was to be found, and we were able to prove it indirectly. Still, it would have been nice to get a rough idea of how long it stood before it was [deleted], and the periodic snapshot caches taken by the Archive would have at least told us if it was in terms of days, months, years, etc. To the point, we didn’t have much of an idea if this -one of the more definitive and comprehensive statements that CJ made about the subject when it blew up- was true, or complete BS:
The mystery ends today (sorta). How? Well, Engineer no. 5 sent out an email about how, curiously, the LGF block on the Internet Archives was no longer in place, and now anyone can freely browse again (whether this was intentional on CJ’s part or not, we’re not sure; it seems strange for him to lift the block like this after more than a year). Almost immediately (or, at least after I read the email), I stretched my ctrl+c finger, and started pluggin’ some choice urls into the interface. What popped up* was pretty interesting:
Note the Feb. 2, 2006, which means that #218822 was actually sitting there on LGF unmolested for almost 3 years (at least; this date is the most recent snapshot we can find). So, CJ is lying in one or more ways:
- It was certainly not [deleted] “very soon” after it was posted.
- CJ didn’t have a timestamp on his dashboard to indicate when a comment was [deleted].
- Both 1 and 2
To add insult to injury, Johnson could have been busted on this a long time ago, had a fact-check team such as the BRC been around back when the comment was still live. Check this exchange from 2004, in article #10619:
But alas, Johnson escaped unbusted.
Unfortunately, we can’t be sure if the comment was still live in 2009, when we saw this:
Again, the lizards took him at his word.
Our theory? CJ realized that he made his emphatic statement on his 2010 Guardian article outside the comfort of his living room, and with the BRC also lurking he decided to scrub the comment and block the Archive, in an attempt to save face. We’ll probably never know for sure, but it is probable that comment #218822 was live well into 2010.
The takeaway? It’s hard to believe that he didn’t remember essentially christening a term that became associated with LGF for years, so we’re pretty much left to conclude that virtually everything CJ’s has ever said about the “pancake” issue has been a complete pile of BS (which highlights the lengths he’g go and the size of the web he’d weave to protect his ego).
*We can thank the loozards for the tip vis a vis WebCite. We’re keeping that strawberry.
Update: It appears that the screencap we grabbed for Johnson’s aforementioned “timestamp” comment differs from what I snipped today. Can you spot the change (besides the additional updings)?
Update: For those who do not read here:
Back in January, the Boiler Room Crew busted the Johnson in a very old lie, and proved once and for all that the Grand Lizardoid not only referred to Rachel Corrie as “Saint Pancake”, but with the (retroactively [deleted]) comment he had effectively christened the term into LGF canon for many years. It was a glorious victory, and the love was shared by other prominent blogs as well.
Even though CJ’s dismissal of the revelation was extremely weak, there was one thing that was left unfinished: the release of the [deleted] “Saint Pancake” comment (identified in the LGF archives as comment # 218822) for the world to see. We even began a campaign to urge Johnson to do so, but to no avail. The campaign continues, as # 218822 remains as a [deleted] comment.
Or should we say, remained.
It is true, ALL the old LGF comments are currently blocked for non-registered visitors, and even if you were logged in, that third comment in the May, 9 2003 thread “IDF_Raids_ISM” isn’t visible. But as we’ve shown here in recent weeks, we’ve stolen a lot of strawberries here with the help of a little birdie. As a result, we’ve managed to pull a lot of interesting stuff out of the bowels of the memory hole, and we’re happy to report that this now-infamous comment was no exception, so…
Ladies and Gentlemen, Lizards, Lurkers, Stalkers and interested bloggers around the world…The Boiler Room is proud to present…Comment 218822!
We’ll continue our campaign for the release of this from the archives (along with ALL the old comments). In the meantime, please enjoy this big, fat juicy strawberry:
“Charlie! Chaaaaarlie! Dinner’s ready.”
[.Gif animation courtesy of ISTE.]
Rachel Corrie was nicknamed “St. Pancake” by the LGF lizards, and we’ve continued the meme, including a section dedicated to her in The Diary of Daedalus Store. Sure it’s morbid mockery, but is it appropriate? The late National Lampoon mocked Ted Kennedy mercilessly for Chappaquiddick, but he was alive, even though Mary Jo Kopechne was not. So here’s a poll that will remain open for a week. Do we drop St. Pancake or not?
Update: For those who needed clarification on who promoted the St. Pancake meme, here ya go: