From the BRC Archives: Charles Johnson, Easter 2004

LGF – EASTER 2004


60 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 6:41:16am
scaramouche: shh. Don’t want to wake up the Mudheads with any factual data; it might hurt their feelings.


73 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 7:00:09am
Mike: you have stung me to the quick.

Guess you missed the numerous statements from the owner of that site saying it was exactly what he wanted, and that he was delighted with it?

Thank you for the comment, though. Every time you folks reveal yourselves as the low, crass, hate-filled slogan spouters you are, I laugh. But just a little; then I get back to work.

Happy Easter!


85 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 7:13:34am
It’s on the front page, cedar.

102 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 7:44:17am
cedar: got it. So, in other words, a front page post that contains a vile picture (unflattering, too) of me as Eva Braun is fine with you?

Thanks for clarifying.



113 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 8:09:05am
cedar wrote:

No, it’s not. However, I don’t recall seeing a picture of you at all on MetaFilter. Did I miss something?

Nice dodge. Thanks for playing.


169 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 10:45:48am
Folks, we’re talking about two different things. The actual picture was not visible on the Mudfilter page.

There was, however, a link to the picture. That’s what cedar and johnny dee think is just fine. According to these guys, there’s a huge difference between posting the actual picture, and posting a link telling people to go look at the picture. Apparently, when someone posts a link to a crude photoshop that puts my head on Eva Braun’s body at Metafilter, I’m supposed to have humility and acknowledge that I’m not always right.

It’s a matter of nuance, you see. When executing a personal smear job, it’s good to do it in as nuanced a way as possible.


176 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 11:09:10am
One is left to wonder how long that personal attack would have remained on Metafilter’s front page if I hadn’t linked to it.

Getting caught does wonders for some people’s scruples.


180 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 11:24:31am
Folks, what we have here is a typical case of lefty role reversal. To divert attention away from the fact that a link to a really nasty personal attack was left on Mudfilter’s front page for several hours — on Easter morning, mind you — it’s now become a matter of the “group think” at LGF. We’re all supposed to be ashamed and I’m supposed to be humble. And even pointing it out is called a bad thing.

Just observe the tactics at work.


182 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 11:32:07am
OK, folks — I don’t know for sure — I never saw the picture at Mudfilter. So I don’t know either way, at least from my personal experience.

But be aware — this is not the issue. This is an attempt by Mudfilter groupies to turn the argument around and deflect the blame.


197 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 12:12:15pm
cedar: you’re really starting to show your jerk badge.

The “Nuke Mecca crowd,” as you put it, does not appear on the front page.

“A dumb post.” I’m trying to remain level-headed here. But someday I’d like to see how you react if you wake up on a nice Easter morning and find the Mudfilter slimeballs chuckling and patting each other on the back at how clever they are for comparing you to Adolf Hitler’s girlfriend.

In an ugly polka dot dress to boot.

Right, but that’s just “dumb.” Whereas, pointing it out is “shameful, hypocritical, disingenuous,” etc. etc. etc. retch.

That “dumb” post stayed up for almost 6 hours, until I linked to it. I’m pretty sure that if I hadn’t linked to it, it would have remained.

Now go away, you pest.


204 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 12:23:43pm
Please note: now the discussion has turned to ways to shut LGF down, at Metatalk.

[Link: metatalk.metafilter.com…]


215 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 12:33:49pm
That’s right, not everything is about me. How could I have thought that putting my head on Eva Braun, then gloating over it at Metafilter, was about me?

I’m such a thin-skinned narcissist. You have taught me much, cedar.


304 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 7:47:08pm
And by the way, at this point, you’ve made my case, underlined it, signed it, sealed it, bought insurance, and shipped it FedEx. Thanks.


59 Charles Sun, Apr 11, 2004 2:44:03pm
Note: See the update to the thread. They’re saying mean things about us over at “Screw Them” Zuniga’s hole again.


104 Charles Mon, Apr 12, 2004 7:35:16am
SAO (who is in Canada) takes a pause from bashing LGF at every other site in the blogosphere, to spew:

Nobody is comparing Charles himself to a Nazi, just a few “cherry-picked” comments.

Uh huh. That Eva Braun thing, why, that’s just a joke, right?


167 Charles Mon, Apr 12, 2004 9:36:17am
It’s a lie. There has never been a single post by me that uses the word “pancake” to refer to Rachel Corrie. Not one.


Yeah. Right.

Advertisements

Desperately Seeking Oliver

Someone (whose initials are Charles Foster Johnson) is desperately seeking Oliver Willis‘ endorsement.

So why would The Magical Jazzy Ponytail suck up to Oliver Willis? Heh. Here’s why.

 

While looking for The Classic Oliver Willis Thread:

“You’re so awsome, Charles.” – Sharmuta


Do it, Charles.

Do it, Charles. Find an X-Acto and some Scotch Tape and just do it. It’ll creep you right out.

Updated with video:


Iowahawk Plays The Blues and Nancy Johnson Claims Innocence.


Okay, Charles, let’s do the Name Game.
“Nancy, Nancy, Bo-Bancy, Banana-Fanna Fo-Fancy, me-my-mo-mancy, Nancy.”
“Let’s do Chuck!” Unedited from the BRC Archives:


02056120 17639 77 Charles Sat, Sep 24, 2005 7:09:07am
Smoke much, Nancy?


03323521 23331 10 Charles Mon, Nov 13, 2006 9:32:46am
Dreadnaught: and our new Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, has posted at Daily Kos. She seems to think they are her base.


03498161 24118 27 Charles Tue, Jan 23, 2007 4:41:13pm
Somebody told Nancy to try to stop blinking.


03498193 24118 59 Charles Tue, Jan 23, 2007 4:47:32pm
Nancy’s lips are pursing.


04510149 27996 1146 Charles Wed, Nov 21, 2007 9:18:18am

re: #1139 ggt

I’m shocked–Ed got banned?

Where have I been. I tried to search, but can’t find where he was banned–so I can read about it.

Yes, he was banned when I learned that he was copying and pasting my comments at a hostile site. Instead of emailing me to ask why he was banned, or to ask me to reconsider, he immediately started posting at Atlas and Gates of Vienna, feeding their hate fantasies, and calling me “Nancy.”

Ed’s mask has come completely off. He was no friend of LGF.


05875214 31254 382 Charles Sun, Sep 14, 2008 12:31:04pm

After reading some of the crazy stuff at the links Nancy posted, I’m beginning to tilt toward the view that this was either a setup to discredit McCain/Palin (especially Palin), or yes, racism.


06997362 33297 791 Charles Mon, Apr 6, 2009 4:30:13pm

re: #784 Bagua

Bush bowed his head, pure and simple, if the identical video showed Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi bowing to accept the medal, I highly doubt even one of those now parsing Bush’s bow would do the same for Reid or Pelosi.

Think about about.

If Obama had been shown bowing to receive a medal from Abdullah, I guarantee the same people would be screaming about it even louder.


Verbatim archived posts above are unedited for your cut ‘n paste funnery.  That Charles Johnson smeared Nancy Pelosi is a given.

Shall we continue and list all the other women [like Liberty Chick aka Mandy Nagy] that Charles Johnson has harassed? Hell, Charles kept harassing Mandy even after she’d had a debilitating stroke. She couldn’t even speak let alone type to defend herself.

Ain’t that right, Charles…


New Poll: Majority of Americans Believe Charles Johnson is Full of Crap.

No it doesn’t, Charles. Read your own link.

Now read this.


Ride The Decline Illustrated

All he needs is a magical jazzy ponytail and it’s Our Boy Charles & LGF.

[Animated .gif found hereRide The Decline – The Breitbart Project Intro

is still here.]


Charles Johnson: “I Don’t Do This Very Often, But I Do This Very Often.”

Yeah, sure, Charles. Whatever. There’s no law against snivelling for dollars, so have at it. You’re the best at it, and have been for at least a decade. Meanwhile, please ‘splain this:

Charles. I’ve seen bar fights. A shot glass is not a bar weapon unless you throw it. Good luck on hitting your opponent directly in the eye. Apparently you’re a witness to a crime of assault and battery involving a shot glass. Did you file a Police Report or were you the one who threw the shot glass?

No you didn’t, and no you weren’t, otherwise you would have posted and been crowing about the report on LGF and claimed to be a hero.

LIAR.