How did Charles Johnson react to the Election? By going scooters.

little-flat-green-footballToo much whiny hyperbole over at The Swamp today to choose from, so we lifted a short Twitter convo instead.

2016-election-cj-2 2016-election-cj-3

Angry, despondent and they’re eating their own. Maybe it’s because of the steady drumbeat of garbage like this:

2016-election-cj-1

Advertisements

Oh, brother.

Wow. Breaking news: Obama’s father was a muslim, so Obama’s half-brother is a muslim. Brilliant sleuthing, Charles.

00663839 10636 79 Charles Tue, Apr 13, 2004 11:23:43am
Oh, brother.

00667375 10661 124 Charles Thu, Apr 15, 2004 3:18:02pm
Oh, brother.

00674921 10717 157 Charles Sun, Apr 18, 2004 3:20:20pm
Oh, brother.

00693460 10843 385 Charles Thu, Apr 29, 2004 3:49:31pm
Oh, brother.

00693930 10847 91 Charles Thu, Apr 29, 2004 4:59:10pm
Oh, brother. Read the rest of this entry »


Charles Johnson Pwns Himself on The Presidential Debates

Just like everyone else in the Blogosphere, the first thing on my mind was,”What’s Charles Johnson’s take on the Town-Hall-Style Manufactured Debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton?” I considered collecting his live Tweets, then I thought I might screencap his comments on Little Green Footballs instead, since he always reposts them there for kudos from his little green lizard lappers.

So I put on my BRC wading boots and ventured into The Swamp. What I found was not surprising: three back-to-back threads, posted as if the comments were coming in too fast for the little green chubby stompy feets to keep up with them, and I realized there was not much point in going further. It’s all right there up front in all its glorious vapidity.

lgf-debate-october-2016

Aside from Johnson’s predictable gross misrepresentations, does anyone really believe that 11,583 people watched it on a Little Green Footballs thread, or that another 3,194 people stuck around for Charles Johnson’s Inane Wrap Up?

Little Green Footballs is nothing more than a parrot site, and Charles, you’re a ignorant mess.


Charles Johnson Would Agree With Susan Milligan

Who is Susan Milligan you might ask? She is a Hillary flack who works at U.S. News & World Report (I was shocked  that that magazine was still in existence) who spins Hillary’s lack of accomplishments at the State Department by defining the role of Secretary of State as “making sure nothing goes wrong on his or her watch” and agrees with Chris Matthews that it is “too bad that she was not tough enough on Benjamin Netanyahu” (who  happens to be more pro American than anyone in the Obama administration  or at Little Green Footballs for that matter). Maybe Susan Milligan and Charles Johnson ought to get together for dinner – come to think of it given his finances and personal hygiene that is not a good idea.

Good News, Hillary’s No Longer Running on Experience

by Daniel Greenfield

The “Hillary’s Accomplishments” question really gets under the media’s skin. It’s why Hillary is running a corporate branding media tour instead of an actual campaign. The latest media talking point tries to flip the narrative around, but only makes it worse [2].

U.S. News & World Report’s Susan Milligan wildly spun for Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton on the May 20 edition of Hardball when she insisted that the fact that her supporters in a recent focus-group survey by Bloomberg TV cannot name a single accomplishment of hers as Secretary of State is, well, “unfair.”

Indeed, Milligan insisted, the job of Secretary of State is essentially to make sure nothing major goes wrong on his or her watch.

Does the word “Benghazi” ring a bell? The Reset Button with Russia? The Middle East going up in flames?

Milligan wants Hillary to take a Mulligan, but that still doesn’t work. If Hillary is to be measured by things not going wrong on her watch, that’s actually worse than trying to find her accomplishments in a haystack.

MATTHEWS: Hey, Obama didn’t have a big accomplishment before he got elected.

BACON: Exactly. You already know what she’s for.

Sure. Let’s use the most unqualified guy in the Oval Office in history as your example. But Hillary’s whole gambit was claiming experience. So now we’re dropping experience and trying to sell Hillary as another Obama?

And even better, “we already know what she’s for.” Like gay marriage. Or the Iraq War. Or any other issue she randomly switches sides on.

MATTHEWS: I wish she hadn’t left it to John Kerry to stand up to Netanyahu, though.

MILLIGAN: Yeah.

MATTHEWS: A little tougher on him would have been good for the country.

The one thing Hillary didn’t do right was not be anti-Israel enough. There’s a campaign slogan in there somewhere.
________________________________________________
Back to the original questions [Briareus]:

1. What has Hillary accomplished besides ascending Mount Everest, and

2. Who is Susan Milligan?
_______________________________________________