Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs Calls Kanye West an Uncle Tom.

Charles didn’t say it specifically, but his message is unmistakably loud and clear:

“Get back on the plantation, boy.”

What a two-faced hypocritical racist a-hole. Put on your white hood and update your selfie. Show us your Klan face. Charles, you’re a mess.

Advertisements

Guy who wants to raise taxes has breakfast with guy who doesn’t pay them – and I am not referencing Mr. Toot

It is painfully obvious that our favorite punching bag – the unemployed, public assistance addicted, halitosis afflicted, unloved, embittered shut-in fancies himself as a power broker amongst hipsters, progressives and aging radicals (like Bernie Sanders). How he must wish that he were invited to the power breakfast at Sylvia’s Restaurant in Harlem (a famous restaurant where the meeting took place) with Bernie Sanders and the Rev. Al Sharpton, Jr. and that he could encourage them with shouts of “Right on, I am down with the struggle, I played with Al Jarreau” when it comes to wealth redistribution. The problem with that fantasy scenario is that the Rev. Al and Comrade Bernie would look at the slovenly and malodorous Charles Johnson and immediately think that he was either a bus boy or a homeless bum who was looking to swipe some food off the table. Being that normal rules of kindness and charity to not apply to Reds, Charles would get tossed out of and do some panhandling at the nearest McDonald’s.

 

by Errol Louis

(CNN)Hours after claiming a decisive victory over Hillary Clinton in the New Hampshire primary, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders went to New York City to meet with none other than the Rev. Al Sharpton, a move that is sure to rattle Clinton’s advisors and the candidate herself.

Not because Sharpton directly controls a significant block of votes (he doesn’t), but because he symbolizes a larger question facing the Democratic Party: what will African-American voters do when the first black president leaves the White House?

President Obama’s popularity with black voters can’t be overstated: his run for office resulted in millions of black voters registering and casting ballots for the first time in huge numbers in 2008. In 2012, when Obama was running for re-election, the rate of black voter turnout exceeded that for whites for the first time in history. Black voters skew Democratic by an overwhelming ratio of 80 to 11, according to the Pew Research Center, making blacks by far the most loyal demographic group in the Democratic base.

Any hope of a Democratic victory in November depends on heavy turnout by black voters. So it’s smart politics for Clinton and Sanders to make as many friends among black political leaders as possible. And Sharpton — who leads a national organization and hosts a daily three-hour radio talk show heard in dozens of markets around the nation — is a good friend to have.

Like any power broker, Sharpton is well aware of his status. He recently told me of being approached by Clinton’s allies and asked what he wanted in exchange for supporting her candidacy. “What do I want? Nothing!” he told me. “I’ve been to the White House for Christmas and the Super Bowl with the first black president, had more access than any civil rights leader in history. What can Hillary or any other president do for me?”

That’s a pretty good question, and Team Clinton isn’t the only one asking it. Sharpton was recently photographed having breakfast with Kevin Sheekey, a top aide to former New York City mayor Mike Bloomberg, a billionaire businessman who is known to be exploring a possible bid for president as an independent.

“It would be interesting. Bloomberg is one of the few people who could pull off a credible independent candidacy for president,” Sharpton said after the meeting.

“For African-Americans and Latino voters, a 50-state run will enhance our leverage and get our interests addressed. We wouldn’t just be focusing on a few primary states,” he said.

The message is crystal clear: black political activists like Sharpton want to be wooed and are willing to talk with anybody — including Bernie Sanders or Mike Bloomberg — rather than fall in line behind the Democratic establishment candidate, Hillary Clinton.

In upcoming states with large numbers of black voters — including South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia and Louisiana — Clinton will need not just grudging acceptance but energetic mobilization if she wants to win. That is why she recently left the campaign trail to visit mostly-black Flint, Michigan, and decry the racially-tinged manmade health disaster there.

But Sanders’ tete-a-tete with Sharpton makes clear that the black vote is not Clinton’s to take for granted. She’ll need to make more gestures like the trip to Flint and convince black political leaders — not just Sharpton — that the levels of access, pride, government appointments and other benefits won’t vanish when Barack Obama gets on Air Force One for the last time.


A disgusting attack on Ted Cruz

It is no secret that when a minority wanders off the progressive reservation, Democrats take their white sheets out of the closet. I came across this post at LGF and honestly, I am too angry to comment.

Billy Batts


The Race Detective drops the ball on Kelly Osbourne’s ignorant statement

The world famous and legend in his own mind Race Detective was all uppity over Donald Trump’s comments.  As we have documented in the past, when white Progressives make racially bigoted comments, Mr. Toot gives them a pass. Kelly Osbourne stated on the View that if Hispanics are removed from America (yeah like we are just going to not fight back) No one will clean toilet seats. This ignorant statement then prompted Rosie Perez to rip her a new one. Sadly, Perez apologized for going after Osborn at the end of the segment. The Race detective however has been eerily silent about Kelly Osbourne’s bigoted statements.

“If you kick every Latino out of this country, then who is going to be cleaning your toilet, Donald Trump?” Osbourne said. “In the sense that…you know what I mean? But I’m saying that in L.A., they always…” The other co-hosts were taken aback, and Perez said, “Latinos are not only the only people doing that.” Osbourne cut her off and said, “No, I didn’t mean it like that! Come on! I would never mean it like that! I’m not part of this argument.”
At the end of the show, Perez defended Osbourne, telling viewers, “I want to apologize to this young woman once again for being overly sensitive.”

Rosie Perez should not have apologized for rightfully ripping Kelly Osbourne for her ignorant and bigoted statements. For too long white Leftists have gotten a pass for their racist statements about minorities and white Southerners as well. Never forgot one of the most racist regimes in world history was run by the National Socialist Workers Party in Germany, which was a leftist political movement.

The Race Detective is clearly giving Kelly Osbourne a pass because she’s a white Progressive and is allowed to insult any ethnic group she feels. Clearly, Mr. Toot is a supporter of White Privilege, that is White Leftist Privilege!


Obama builds a database that the Race Detective (aka “Mr. Toot”) would approve of

I would be so happy if a low income housing project were built right next door to “Mr. Toot” in Culver City (or wherever the fuck he currently lives – maybe under a highway with other Hobos). Perhaps Mr. Toot actually lives in a low incoming housing project and saunters around telling all the brothers “I fight Vaams Belaang” or “I played with Al Jarreau” lol.  Anyway, Obama who is determined to drive a stake through the heart of America, wants to mix more “people of color” into white neighborhoods and is involved in racial mining data. The irony is that Obama won 8 out of the 10 wealthiest counties in America and the people who voted for him deserve to have the ‘hood come next door to them. Yet you can rest assured he will give his Hollywood buddies a break and not put any “poor African-Americans” next door to Steven Spielberg, Barbra Streisand, Sean Penn, and the like.

 

Obama collecting personal data for a secret race database

by Paul Sperry

A key part of President Obama’s legacy will be the fed’s unprecedented collection of sensitive data on Americans by race. The government is prying into our most personal information at the most local levels, all for the purpose of “racial and economic justice.”

Unbeknown to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.

This Orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast and permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.

Big Brother Barack wants the databases operational before he leaves office, and much of the data in them will be posted online.

So civil-rights attorneys and urban activist groups will be able to exploit them to show patterns of “racial disparities” and “segregation,” even if no other evidence of discrimination exists.

Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history.

Housing database

The granddaddy of them all is the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing database, which the Department of Housing and Urban Development rolled out earlier this month to racially balance the nation, ZIP code by ZIP code. It will map every US neighborhood by four racial groups — white, Asian, black or African-American, and Hispanic/Latino — and publish “geospatial data” pinpointing racial imbalances.

The agency proposes using nonwhite populations of 50% or higher as the threshold for classifying segregated areas.

Federally funded cities deemed overly segregated will be pressured to change their zoning laws to allow construction of more subsidized housing in affluent areas in the suburbs, and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white areas. HUD’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential areas, will be used to select affordable-housing sites.

HUD plans to drill down to an even more granular level, detailing the proximity of black residents to transportation sites, good schools, parks and even supermarkets. If the agency’s social engineers rule the distance between blacks and these suburban “amenities” is too far, municipalities must find ways to close the gap or forfeit federal grant money and face possible lawsuits for housing discrimination.

Civil-rights groups will have access to the agency’s sophisticated mapping software, and will participate in city plans to re-engineer neighborhoods under new community outreach requirements.

“By opening this data to everybody, everyone in a community can weigh in,” Obama said. “If you want affordable housing nearby, now you’ll have the data you need to make your case.”

Mortgage database

Meanwhile, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, headed by former Congressional Black Caucus leader Mel Watt, is building its own database for racially balancing home loans. The so-called National Mortgage Database Project will compile 16 years of lending data, broken down by race, and hold everything from individual credit scores and employment records.

Mortgage contracts won’t be the only financial records vacuumed up by the database. According to federal documents, the repository will include “all credit lines,” from credit cards to student loans to car loans — anything reported to credit bureaus. This is even more information than the IRS collects.

The FHFA will also pry into your personal assets and debts and whether you have any bankruptcies. The agency even wants to know the square footage and lot size of your home, as well as your interest rate.

FHFA will share the info with Obama’s brainchild, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which acts more like a civil-rights agency, aggressively investigating lenders for racial bias.

The FHFA has offered no clear explanation as to why the government wants to sweep up so much sensitive information on Americans, other than stating it’s for “research” and “policymaking.”

However, CFPB Director Richard Cordray was more forthcoming, explaining in a recent talk to the radical California-based Greenlining Institute: “We will be better able to identify possible discriminatory lending patterns.”

Credit database

CFPB is separately amassing a database to monitor ordinary citizens’ credit-card transactions. It hopes to vacuum up some 900 million credit-card accounts — all sorted by race — representing roughly 85% of the US credit-card market. Why? To sniff out “disparities” in interest rates, charge-offs and collections.

Employment database

CFPB also just finalized a rule requiring all regulated banks to report data on minority hiring to an Office of Minority and Women Inclusion. It will collect reams of employment data, broken down by race, to police diversity on Wall Street as part of yet another fishing expedition.

School database

Through its mandatory Civil Rights Data Collection project, the Education Department is gathering information on student suspensions and expulsions, by race, from every public school district in the country. Districts that show disparities in discipline will be targeted for reform.

Those that don’t comply will be punished. Several already have been forced to revise their discipline policies, which has led to violent disruptions in classrooms.

Obama’s educrats want to know how many blacks versus whites are enrolled in gifted-and-talented and advanced placement classes.

Schools that show blacks and Latinos under-enrolled in such curricula, to an undefined “statistically significant degree,” could open themselves up to investigation and lawsuits by the department’s Civil Rights Office.

Count on a flood of private lawsuits to piggyback federal discrimination claims, as civil-rights lawyers use the new federal discipline data in their legal strategies against the supposedly racist US school system.

Even if no one has complained about discrimination, even if there is no other evidence of racism, the numbers themselves will “prove” that things are unfair.

Such databases have never before existed. Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history. He is creating a diversity police state where government race cops and civil-rights lawyers will micromanage demographic outcomes in virtually every aspect of society.

The first black president, quite brilliantly, has built a quasi-reparations infrastructure perpetually fed by racial data that will outlast his administration.


An inconvenient fact about the Nazis that Charles will not discuss

Beginning in 2007 and probably due to very interesting conversations about WWII that filled some of the night time threads, Charles began to be obsessed with Nazis. He accused rightwing groups in Europe who oppose Islam of being Nazis, despite that these groups economic platform was capitalist. These accusations of Nazism, did not stop with European groups.

After the election to Obama and the formation of the tea party, who initially were just focused on economic issues the accusations of Nazism returned to LGF. Anyone who criticized Obama was called a Nazi by Charles. The Californian shut in, even concocted the idea that a plot led by Ron Paul to establish a Global Nazi regime with him as Fuhrer. In the world of Charles Johnson, anyone on the right is considered a Nazi. But the joke is on the 60 something Hipster.

The truth is that the National Socialist German Workers Party was a progressive/socialist entity. The name alone is leftist and the economic platform of the Nazis was socialist. Charles is ideologically closer to the Nazis than the many people he decries as such.

On 16 June 1941, as Hitler readied his forces for Operation Barbarossa, Josef Goebbels looked forward to the new order that the Nazis would impose on a conquered Russia. There would be no come-back, he wrote, for capitalists nor priests nor Tsars. Rather, in the place of debased, Jewish Bolshevism, the Wehrmacht would deliver “der echte Sozialismus”: real socialism.

Goebbels never doubted that he was a socialist. He understood Nazism to be a better and more plausible form of socialism than that propagated by Lenin. Instead of spreading itself across different nations, it would operate within the unit of the Volk.

[….]

Hitler told Hermann Rauschning, a Prussian who briefly worked for the Nazis before rejecting them and fleeing the country, that he had admired much of the thinking of the revolutionaries he had known as a young man; but he felt that they had been talkers, not doers. “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun,” he boasted, adding that “the whole of National Socialism” was “based on Marx”.

Marx’s error, Hitler believed, had been to foster class war instead of national unity – to set workers against industrialists instead of conscripting both groups into a corporatist order. His aim, he told his economic adviser, Otto Wagener, was to “convert the German Volk to socialism without simply killing off the old individualists” – by which he meant the bankers and factory owners who could, he thought, serve socialism better by generating revenue for the state. “What Marxism, Leninism and Stalinism failed to accomplish,” he told Wagener, “we shall be in a position to achieve.”

[….]

Next time you hear Leftists use the word fascist as a general insult, gently point out the difference between what they like to imagine the NSDAP stood for and what it actually proclaimed.

Next time Charles accuses someone on the right of being a Nazi, he should look in the mirror and the comment section of his blog.


“Well Old Joe said a gaffe”

LGF’s resident Kapo Aloutte always makes excuses for anti-Jewish statements emanating from Leftists and Islamists. She downplays Joe Biden’s anti-Semitic comments that has been condemned by Jewish groups.

BidenBiden 2Biden 3

Would Aloutte give the same benefit of the doubt if someone on the right used this term? Nope, she would be using it as proof the right is racist and her master Charles would have done 4 posts by now condemning it.

Aloutte is just being a good Kapo by covering for Biden.