Terror attack in Paris on the Charlie Hebdo office

The Religion of peace strikes again. Gunmen from al-Qaeda’s Yemen affiliated stormed the offices French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo. As of this writing, 12 were killed and the Islamic militants are still on the loose.

PARIS (AP) — Three masked gunmen shouting “Allahu akbar!” stormed the Paris offices of a satirical newspaper Wednesday, killing 12 people, including its editor, before escaping in a car. It was France’s deadliest postwar terrorist attack.

Security forces were hunting for the gunmen who spoke flawless, unaccented French in the military-style noon-time attack on the weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo, located near Paris’ Bastille monument. The publication’s caricatures of the Prophet Muhammed have frequently drawn condemnation from Muslims.

President Francois Hollande called the slayings “a terrorist attack without a doubt,” and said several other attacks have been thwarted in France “in recent weeks.”

[….]

“Hey! We avenged the Prophet Muhammad! We killed Charlie Hebdo,” one of the men shouted in French, according to a video shot from a nearby building and broadcast on French TV. Other video showed two gunmen in black at a crossroads who appeared to fire down one of the streets. A cry of “Allahu akbar!” — Arabic for “God is great”— could be heard among the gunshots.

[….]

On social media, supporters of militant Islamic groups praised the move. One self-described Tunisian loyalist of al-Qaida and the Islamic State group tweeted that the attack was well-deserved revenge against France.

Over at LGF, they are downplaying this attack and mocking people who are angry about it.

Charlie Hebdo Charlie Hebdo2 Charlie Hebdo3 Charlie Hebdo4 Charlie Hebdo5 Charlie Hebdo6 Charlie Hebdo7 Charlie Hebdo8 Charlie Hebdo9 Charlie Hebdo10 Charlie Hebdo11

Charles chimes in on the attack and rather than condeming the act, he lashes at out at the Right.

Charles and LGF support Islamic terrorism.

Update:

Posted without comment.

Charlie Hebdo12

Charles criticizes people posting the anti-Islamic cartoons.

Charlie Hebdo13

Charles sympathizes with Islamists, not the people killed.

Update II:

Now Curious Lurker chimes in.

Charlie Hebdo14

Its obvious where her sympathies lie.

Advertisements

176 Comments on “Terror attack in Paris on the Charlie Hebdo office”

  1. Doppel milyo says:

    RIP to these brave cartoonists. The shit they took this morning before they were killed had more value than the entire cast at LGF

    reading their comments makes me sick.
    Speaking of the American Christian Right ISIS.
    riiiiiiiiiight

    stupid useful idiots and cowards. All of them

  2. Doppel milyo says:

  3. Because "Donkey Show" starts with "I" says:

    Brilliant. “Christian ISIS”. So Christianity starts with “I”?

  4. Doppel milyo says:

    I’m not at all surprised by the sickening, self-loathing , dangerous and naïve commentary at LGF. Their Hero Charles worships at the alter of Obama who called Ft Hood “workplace violence”

    I’d love to piss on all of you and make you beg for seconds, you bunch of weaklings

  5. Captain Death says:

    “Terror attacks have become an opportunity for the right to pound their chests and spew indiscriminate hatred at Muslims.” – That sounds like he is describing Charles Johnson 6 – 10 years ago.

    • Arachne says:

      Oh, you mean like after every terror attack in the U.S., you and the liberal media look for a right-wing TEA Party connection? And haven’t found one yet? You still are proffering the Las Vegas shooters as Right Wing when it’s been established they were your Occupy asshole buddies.

  6. Robert says:

    Chunky thinks the American media shouldn’t be making the Paris terrorist attack the lead story today when a terrible but isolated incident at a building housing an NAACP chapter, and that injured no one, is clearly the bigger terrorism story.

  7. Captain Death says:

    What a dumb motherfucker!

    55 Romantic Heretic Jan 7, 2015 11:07:41am

    0
    down
    up
    report

    Might be speaking out of my ass here but I personally doubt that this is Islamic terrorists.

    The magazine might have posted a satirical cartoon of Mohammed but I guarantee they posted a lot of satirical stuff about the Crazy Right. A Crazy Right that is just as vicious and murderous as any Islamist, and there are far more of them in France. Just as the Crazy Right far outnumbers the Islamists here in Canada and the US.

    So until a trial is held and people are convicted I’m more inclined to believe RWNJs did this than Islamists.

    Read more at http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/44189_Paris_Police_Say_12_Dead_After_Shooting_at_Charlie_Hebdo#jF2po7D03BQpp7Oy.99

    • Robert says:

      LOL!

      • livefreeor die says:

        Yeah, remember when the crazy right shot up a newspaper that criticized them?…No?…
        Well, remember when the crazy right shot a policeman begging for his life?….No?..
        Hey, look at all those people shot at abortion clinics everyday…No?…

        You’re right, Romantic Heretic,
        You are speaking out of your ass.

    • Doppel milyo says:

      “might be speaking out of my ass”

      you are

  8. swamprat says:

    Well, is the media still avoiding the dreaded “terrorist” accusation?
    Since the attack wasn’t from employees, this can simply be attributed to a “business conflict”.

  9. Captain Death says:

    Some intelligent life spotted on Planet LGF
    68 lostlakehiker Jan 7, 2015 11:17:05am

    0
    down
    up
    report

    re: #55 Romantic Heretic

    Might be speaking out of my ass here but I personally doubt that this is Islamic terrorists.

    The magazine might have posted a satirical cartoon of Mohammed but I guarantee they posted a lot of satirical stuff about the Crazy Right. A Crazy Right that is just as vicious and murderous as any Islamist, and there are far more of them in France. Just as the Crazy Right far outnumbers the Islamists here in Canada and the US.

    So until a trial is held and people are convicted I’m more inclined to believe RWNJs did this than Islamists.

    You’ve been smoking some really good stuff.

    Honestly!? You will have us believe that this is a false flag stunt? That it is the work of three Anders Breivik types? Because the people who did this are on tape shouting Allahu Akhbar.

    And they made a getaway. This is not the work of a lone gunman full of delusions.

    As to a trial, these guys are no sure thing to be caught at all. If cornered, they are unlikely to surrender.

    Read more at http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/44189_Paris_Police_Say_12_Dead_After_Shooting_at_Charlie_Hebdo#jF2po7D03BQpp7Oy.99

    • Because says:

      I say if they catch them, send them to a college rape tribunal.

      – No lawyers.
      – Guilty until proven innocent.
      – No opportunity to prove innocence.
      – No talking back.
      – No facing your accusers.
      – No judge.
      – No jury.
      – No need to know what you’re accused of.
      – And that’s final, you rapist

      Now, take ’em out back, and stuff ’em full of pig entrails.

  10. Captain Death says:

    78 Charles Johnson Jan 7, 2015 11:20:34am

    0
    down
    up
    report

    Email from one of the loons still raging at me for renouncing the right:

    Hey Chuck-O: Remember when you slandered Pro Köln for no good reason?
    They later showed the Mohammed cartoons and narrowly escaped an Islamist
    hit squad. But no one really cared cause they were “bad right-wing
    populists”. Now the Islamo-Fascists have come for the French press and
    everyone yells like a stuck pig! To paraphrase Bonhoeffer: “First they
    came for Pro Köln, but I said nothing.. then they came for me.”
    How did Obama put it? “The future does not belong to those who slander
    the prophet of Islam”! Perhaps you should begin re-thinking your
    ass-kissing appeasement policy before history leaves you and your ilk
    entirely discredited as the Quislings you are.

    Read more at http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/44189_Paris_Police_Say_12_Dead_After_Shooting_at_Charlie_Hebdo#jF2po7D03BQpp7Oy.99

    • Arachne says:

      What’s the over/under, do you think, on this being a “check it out, I’m still relevant” made-up email by Fatty McLardbutt that he probably stole from the comments section at MSNBC and modified to be an email to him?

      • Octopus says:

        I would bet the farm on it, Arachne. If I had a farm. If I had a fat farm, I’d have Chunky on it, sweatin’ to the oldies. 😉

      • Because says:

        Eww. You know they require pig farmers to treat pig shit in little treatment plants these days, don’t you?

  11. swamprat says:

    The War TARDIS1/06/2015 8:17:28 pm PST

    -9
    down
    up
    report

    re: #108 The Ghost of a Funky Discarded Egg

    Guess, what? This time, I don’t see why that this is a bad thing.

    Since living in Colorado Springs, I can’t feel my faith in a normal manner, though my Imam says it is ok. One of my best friends lost a sister there. My sister had to attend 4 funerals for 4 friends who committed suicide. Colorado Springs has the 2nd highest suicide rate in the nation.

    Most of the homeless kids in the city. Children kicked out by their parents for being gay. The city, supposedly so Christian, took maybe a few dozen of IDPs after Hurricane Katrina.

    The city is evil to the core. I want it to be judged.
    another peaceful follower of mohammed. I assume the gay kids would be fine if they were from Islamic families?

    • Octopus says:

      Get this fucking nut on your local FBI’s radar. He’s ticking, again.

    • livefreeor die says:

      Actually, Colorado Springs is supposed to be full of very wealthy libs.
      Sorry to burst another bubble of this psychotic danger to society.
      I’m sure Obama’s CIA is on it bigtime.

    • Just poop says:

      fucking splodeydope

      just do it already, only have the fucker go off in your basement. save us all lots of agro

  12. Robert says:

    Strange that these terrorists used AK-47s when such rifles are banned in France.

    I guess all France’s gun laws did was ensure the terrorists wouldn’t have to fear any law-abiding citizen would be armed.

  13. swamprat says:

    This just in! Prince Andrew can turn his head just like an owl when he is in the presence of an underaged prostitute!
    For pictures go to LittleGreenFootballs.com.

    I am waiting to see what other superpowers the prince possesses.

    • swamprat says:

      missing;
      “For pictures go to Little Green Footballs very dotty com.

      • swamprat says:

        There is some speculation that the photo may have been altered, but he really can turn his head like an owl, no matter what ginger Johnson alleges. charles is correct on this one.

  14. Octopus says:

    Somebody toss some pig’s blood on this skank. Thx!

  15. Octopus says:

    Chunky’s on a roll, renouncing his eight years of clarity regarding Islamist terror. Keep going, Fatass! We’re working on a suicide-vest for you, which will be ready as soon as we can round up enough plastique to cover a barn.

  16. swamprat says:

    charles tweeted:
    Yes, conservatives are now linking the Charlie Hebdo attack to… wait for it… BENGHAZI. It never stops.

    • swamprat says:

      No co-relation whatsoever;
      One involved a bunch of people killed by muslims reacting to the public humiliation of Mohammed in the media and the other one is
      uh
      wait
      ,, er
      well

  17. Doppel milyo says:

    as usual Dave gets it

  18. Because says:
  19. OLT's Hey, They're YOUR Rules, I Just Read Them says:

    • Because says:

      Wasn’t there some sci-fi comic book about sterno-drinking Argentine Nazis with bum knees stored frozen under the Denver airport and awaiting some Grand Lizard to turn them loose with renewed airtime minutes?

  20. OLT's Hey, They're YOUR Rules, I Just Read Them says:

    OMG, I read Sally Kohn’s Twitter TL.

    Never go fully delusional.

    • OLT's Hey, They're YOUR Rules, I Just Read Them says:

      It’s a gold mine of leftist rectal-cranial insertion that makes ostriches look like eagles.

      Islamic countries LOVE women, ’cause they have 8 female heads of state!

      • Because says:

        All crammed in there with a ton of bumf.

      • livefreeor die says:

        Let’s see, how do most of these female heads of state leave office….
        Oh yeah, they get the treatment those cartoonists got this morning.

  21. Because olo olololo hahahah hohohoh snorty snort pffffff hehehahaha says:

    Tweeteth the author of the Atari 400 classic, “mouse-ka-mania”…

  22. Just poop says:

  23. Just poop says:

    “FAITH TRADITIONS”

    clitorectomies
    killing of apostates
    killing of gays

    • Abu bin Squid says:

      honor killings of family females
      multiple wives
      buggering young boys
      funding jihad
      more honor killings of family females
      rinse
      repeat

  24. Because olo olololo hahahah hohohoh snorty snort pffffff hehehahaha says:

    • Arachne says:

      From the man who gave out “breaking” news not too long ago only to discover it was a 2009 story.

  25. Juan Epstein says:

    Not taking off fish with feet magnet, because white people.

  26. JimboXL says:

    Predictable, the fat pig progressive de facto mouthpieces of the Islamic Klux Klan are the first to roll out of bed to condemn anyone but the Muslim killers. How curious,12 lone wolf Muslims just happened to meet at the same place at the same time with the same plan.

  27. Arachne says:

    Fatass is still dying to be noticed by the people at Twitchy so he can claim some relevance. *Yawn*

  28. Because olo says:

  29. rightymouse says:

    Gussy? Is it possible for you to focus on the fact that 12 people were just murdered in France by insane Islamists without freaking out & feeling as though you need to stick your head in the sand???

    • Just poop says:

      threats gus

      threats.

      Muslims kill

      get it putz?

    • rightymouse says:

      This is some sick shit Gussy. What is WRONG with you???

  30. Because no shit Bummo? says:

  31. rightymouse says:

    Great. Then can we just bomb the hell out of them like we did with the enemies of humanity in WWII??

  32. rightymouse says:

    So do you. And your point is……??

  33. rightymouse says:

    • rightymouse says:

      These people are nuts. Good Lord. O_o

      • Octopus says:

        Sarah needs that new “Slap Therapy,” which involves being slapped hard every time you say something so stupid that even Muslims laugh.

      • Because says:

        Wearing a red plaid onesie. “Let me tell you about the ACA…”

      • Because biff! says:

        Considering that there’s no humor allowed in islam (according to ayatollah what’s-his-name), that’s going to be a lot of slappage.

        OTOH, she does seem to have that “slap me” dweeb look down pat.

      • rightymouse says:

        Her timeline is full of youthful, liberal, migraine-inducing dreck…..

      • OLT's I Can't Even, PLEASE says:

        BUT HATE IS WRONG

      • stabby says:

        Everything I need to know about terrorism, I learned in kindergarten!

    • Because la la la... says:

      Violence involves kinetics. No, really. It does. I guess writing a cartoon involves some level of kinetics, since a pen must be pushed against friction, therefore it’s violent. Tweeting astonishingly asinine tweets also involves the kinetics of pushing buttons. Therefore that tweet was violent.

    • Because go Dwight! says:

    • OLT's I Can't Even, PLEASE says:

      OK, HER Twitter timeline is even more retch-inducing than Sally Kohn’s.

      And this statement is the single stupidest Leftist false moral equivalences I have ever read.

      I’ll take the “violent” cartoon over the bullet sprayed from a Kalashnikov, thank you.

  34. Octopus says:

    http://twitchy.com/2015/01/07/shut-up-already-catholic-leagues-bill-donohue-offers-idiotic-take-on-terrorist-attacks/

    It’s really something, that Fatass has found sympatico with two Catholics this week. Is he preparing to convert, ya think?

  35. Octopus says:

    Is the Paris atrocity going to be the nontroversy of the week, because…Christians?

    Good plan, Chunky.

    • rightymouse says:

      I’m thinking that “shot while trying to escape” might not be so bad except the gendarmes may want to interrogate the SOB’s first.

    • Because says:

      Got the gentle giants? With iced tea and skittles?

  36. rightymouse says:

    Words fail me….

  37. rightymouse says:

    Keep going, Gussy. Your thought process is a sad example of what happens when one smokes sterno and pot reefers.

  38. Macker says:

    And just so selrahC isn’t left out…

    #lgf SPECIAL! #CharlieHebdo #tcot #gop #tgdn

    – Macker (@mackers_world) January 8, 2015

  39. JimboXL says:

    I’m doubtful you’d even find that actual Muslim terrorist groups spoke out against and condemned anyone but the Muslim killers more quickly than the disgusting progressives in America.

    • Octopus says:

      I think you’re correct, Jimbo. The Islamists are boasting and proud, the “Moderate Muslims” are silent and pensive, awaiting violent reprisals promised by the Left, leaving the disgusting Proggies to attempt their magical relativist deflection of the truth. Which group is the worst? It’s a toss-up.

    • Doppel milyo says:

      Correctomundo

  40. Octopus says:

    To drown out the ululating Proggies, and the hellish “call to pound head against ground:”

  41. Octopus says:

  42. Octopus says:

    Has anyone bothered to look into this alleged photography bollocks Chunky has been harping about all week? I can’t seem to find the time. I know it’s something incredibly stupid, though, based on his obsessive tweeting.

  43. Octopus says:

    JE SUIS CHUNKY

  44. Octopus says:

    Just read that last update above, from Furious Burka, who’s “not feeling the #je suis charlie thing.” What are you feeling, Stupid? Like you converted to an insane death cult? Like you wish you still had your fun-button? “Moderate?”

  45. Octopus says:

    Oh, man…the dvd screeners have hit the fan. Gonna be some movie-watchin’, tomorrow. “Sniper” and “Unbroken,” for starters.

    I love free movies. Thanks, Hollywood! 🙂

  46. Octopus says:

    Did somebody buy Garage Boy some more minutes/mb? ‘Cuz he’s really putting them to good use.

  47. Octopus says:

    Good work, Germans! You want some Freedom Fries with that?

  48. Octopus says:

    Some people do a pretty good job with this Twitter-thing. Not Chunky…he’s hopeless. 😆

  49. stabby says:

    Wow, I was a little surprised that Charles’ response was nobody defend freedom of speech, because there will be right wingers doing that! What did you all do to the boy, he’s so tramatised!

    Charles, show us on the doll where the bad Republicans touched you…

    I was in a thread today that had TWO Muslims defending the murders. Not hiding it at all, flat out defending terror.

    But no one on Charles’ site can find any examples of that right?

  50. Pakimon says:

    Rut Roh!

    The Ginger Chuck is “goin’ Greenwald” on Chunky’s ass, forcing the corpulent one to go into Jazzy Ponytail damage control mode!

  51. Pakimon says:

    This tweet has the moonbats shrieking and squealing with rage.

    You just know the fat ponytailed dickhead is going to hop on that bandwagon.

    You’ll know when it happens when you hear the loud crash of the bandwagon’s axles giving way due to the massive overload of weight.

  52. Doppel milyo says:

    Pens up
    Don’t shoot

  53. Octopus says:

    Hey, Furious Burka — scratch your itchy crotch with the Wall Street Journal.
    Have a hategasm.

    ————————————————————————–

    How to Answer the Paris Terror Attack
    The West must stand up for freedom—and acknowledge the link between Islamists’ political ideology and their religious beliefs.
    By AYAAN HIRSI ALI
    Jan. 7, 2015 6:08 p.m. ET
    73 COMMENTS

    After the horrific massacre Wednesday at the French weekly satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, perhaps the West will finally put away its legion of useless tropes trying to deny the relationship between violence and radical Islam.

    This was not an attack by a mentally deranged, lone-wolf gunman. This was not an “un-Islamic” attack by a bunch of thugs—the perpetrators could be heard shouting that they were avenging the Prophet Muhammad. Nor was it spontaneous. It was planned to inflict maximum damage, during a staff meeting, with automatic weapons and a getaway plan. It was designed to sow terror, and in that it has worked.

    The West is duly terrified. But it should not be surprised.

    If there is a lesson to be drawn from such a grisly episode, it is that what we believe about Islam truly doesn’t matter. This type of violence, jihad, is what they, the Islamists, believe.

    There are numerous calls to violent jihad in the Quran. But the Quran is hardly alone. In too much of Islam, jihad is a thoroughly modern concept. The 20th-century jihad “bible,” and an animating work for many Islamist groups today, is “The Quranic Concept of War,” a book written in the mid-1970s by Pakistani Gen. S.K. Malik. He argues that because God, Allah, himself authored every word of the Quran, the rules of war contained in the Quran are of a higher caliber than the rules developed by mere mortals.

    In Malik’s analysis of Quranic strategy, the human soul—and not any physical battlefield—is the center of conflict. The key to victory, taught by Allah through the military campaigns of the Prophet Muhammad, is to strike at the soul of your enemy. And the best way to strike at your enemy’s soul is through terror. Terror, Malik writes, is “the point where the means and the end meet.” Terror, he adds, “is not a means of imposing decision upon the enemy; it is the decision we wish to impose.”

    Those responsible for the slaughter in Paris, just like the man who killed the Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh in 2004, are seeking to impose terror. And every time we give in to their vision of justified religious violence, we are giving them exactly what they want.

    In Islam, it is a grave sin to visually depict or in any way slander the Prophet Muhammad. Muslims are free to believe this, but why should such a prohibition be forced on nonbelievers? In the U.S., Mormons didn’t seek to impose the death penalty on those who wrote and produced “The Book of Mormon,” a satirical Broadway sendup of their faith. Islam, with 1,400 years of history and some 1.6 billion adherents, should be able to withstand a few cartoons by a French satirical magazine. But of course deadly responses to cartoons depicting Muhammad are nothing new in the age of jihad.

    Moreover, despite what the Quran may teach, not all sins can be considered equal. The West must insist that Muslims, particularly members of the Muslim diaspora, answer this question: What is more offensive to a believer—the murder, torture, enslavement and acts of war and terrorism being committed today in the name of Muhammad, or the production of drawings and films and books designed to mock the extremists and their vision of what Muhammad represents?

    To answer the late Gen. Malik, our soul in the West lies in our belief in freedom of conscience and freedom of expression. The freedom to express our concerns, the freedom to worship who we want, or not to worship at all—such freedoms are the soul of our civilization. And that is precisely where the Islamists have attacked us. Again.

    How we respond to this attack is of great consequence. If we take the position that we are dealing with a handful of murderous thugs with no connection to what they so vocally claim, then we are not answering them. We have to acknowledge that today’s Islamists are driven by a political ideology, an ideology embedded in the foundational texts of Islam. We can no longer pretend that it is possible to divorce actions from the ideals that inspire them.

    This would be a departure for the West, which too often has responded to jihadist violence with appeasement. We appease the Muslim heads of government who lobby us to censor our press, our universities, our history books, our school curricula. They appeal and we oblige. We appease leaders of Muslim organizations in our societies. They ask us not to link acts of violence to the religion of Islam because they tell us that theirs is a religion of peace, and we oblige.

    What do we get in return? Kalashnikovs in the heart of Paris. The more we oblige, the more we self-censor, the more we appease, the bolder the enemy gets.

    There can only be one answer to this hideous act of jihad against the staff of Charlie Hebdo. It is the obligation of the Western media and Western leaders, religious and lay, to protect the most basic rights of freedom of expression, whether in satire on any other form. The West must not appease, it must not be silenced. We must send a united message to the terrorists: Your violence cannot destroy our soul.

    Ms. Hirsi Ali, a fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School, is the author of “Infidel” (2007). Her latest book, “Heretic: The Case for a Muslim Reformation,” will be published in April by HarperCollins

    • ISpeakJive says:

      She lived it, she knows what she’s talking about, but of course, according to Fatass, she’s an idiot. He tweeted yesterday that Robert Spencer is no expert on Islam, either. Absurd.

  54. Octopus says:

    • Doppel milyo says:

      wow

      curious lurker is prettier than I’d imagined

    • Arachne says:

      Now THAT’s how you get retweets, FATASS!

    • rightymouse says:

      Coffee just squirted out of my nose. LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!
      19,130 retweets. LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!

      • Arachne says:

        And how many of them were from critics to other critics saying “do you believe the DUMB in this guy?” You know, like the 7K retweets Fatass got one night – it was going round and round conservative sites asking if he was really that dumb. Notice, if you will that he got only 8 retweets to his reponse to Caruso’s, which got 30. He barely averages three retweets – and you would think that with 11K followers, he’d get more than that.

  55. livefreeor die says:

    That Jay Caruso tweet was brilliant. I love watching when libs’ memes collide. I posted “Je suis Charlie” on Facebook to see what libs I know would say. Nothing. Absolute silence. No outrage over the murders or the threats to freedom of speech.
    They should all go say the shahada already. Stupid dhimmis.

  56. livefreeor die says:

    Hey, Chuckles,
    Didn’t YOU post some of the Mohammed cartoons back in the day?

  57. Because says:

  58. Octopus says:

    http://gotnews.com/breaking-charliehebdo-killers-imam-called-punishing-mohammed-cartoonists-jesuischarlie/

    Imam Larbi Kechat, who is connected with the Syrian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, called for the artists to receive divine punishment and said their artwork was the worst sort of terrorism. “The most abject terrorism is the symbolic kind, which spreads unlimited violence.”

    Ginger is on the story, Chunky. Why aren’t you? Oh, right…you’re assigned to the Twitterwar Theater. On behalf of terror-apologists everywhere. Carry on.

  59. Octopus says:

    That “NAACP bombing” Chunky was all blubbergasted about? Yeah, it was a fizzle. Nothing, really. So let’s call it a race-war, Fatass.

    http://gotnews.com/breaking-denver-police-dont-think-naacpbombing-serious/

    Gotnews.com has learned from its police sources that the Denver Police doesn’t think the alleged bombing of a NAACP office is serious.

    Our Denver PD sources tell us that there was an incendiary device, not a bomb. “It was a gas can that didn’t explode,” says a source in the know.

    The alleged bombing wasn’t even mentioned at roll calls.

    The explosion was apparently less explosive than even an M80 says a tipster.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6y6g2UCUAAzAzO.jpg:large

    • Arachne says:

      Fatass again on the wrong side of the narrative. Trust me, asshat, those right-wing militia types you rail against that you see hiding in all the bushes would not have delivered a fizzle bomb to the NAACP. Did any group claim credit?

  60. Because says:

  61. Octopus says:

    Let me know if Furious Burka or P-LOL phones in any bomb-threats.

  62. Because olo says:

    Lol. Moe Howard was Jewish.

  63. Because olo says:

  64. Because olo says:

    Really.

    • Arachne says:

      Really Fatass? Maybe the media coverage is “lagging” because the bomb fizzled, no one was hurt, and it had the cumulative effect of … nothing. In fact, there’s more speculation that the NAACP may have actually done this themselves – you know all about that, right? Granted it’s more serious than planting racist comments but it’s along the same general principles.

      • Octopus says:

        That one screams “false flag op,” if not “teenaged goofballs prank.” Real terrorists don’t put a firecracker on a can of gas and call it a bomb. Idiots looking for attention do that. FAIL!

        Naturally, Dear Fatass is doubling-down on this stupid nothing. 😆

      • Because olo says:

        I vote for goofball. There’s no shortage of them in Denver. Maybe “hobo”?

      • Arachne says:

        Yes, he is. Because he just KNOWS he’s finally got an act of terrorism that he’s sure he can link to the TEA Party! Those EBIL RAAAAACISTS.

        BTW, remember how that audio of the guy at the computer was just gonna blow that Michael Brown case WIDE OPEN? And how he snotted at everyone who was skeptical of its value? This was gonna prove that HIS narrative and investment in the story was the right one and how dare you express doubts!

        Um….can anyone steer me to the story that reports on the final FBI analysis? Because the story pretty much stopped when it was turned over to the FBI and I’m assuming the results weren’t what they wanted or Fatass would have done at least 47 tweets on it.

  65. Octopus says:

    Back when I was an stubborn libturd, I used to have a subscription to The New Yorker. They publish some interesting articles on this and that, as well as some thoughtful reviews of movies, books, and telly. I let my subscription lapse sometime in 2002, when they recovered from their momentary lapse of clarity and support for Dubya post-9/11, and reverted to the most disgusting anti-conservative, anti-Islamofascist political group-grope. It’s their Leftist Culture, you see. They can only keep it under wraps for so long.

    So, imagine my shock and awe to read this piece of fire-breathing anti-Islamist rhetoric, just now: http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/blame-for-charlie-hebdo-murders

    There’s a little pattycaking around the sensitivities of those silent Muzz Moderates, but very little. Gonna raise some eyebrows with their readership. 😯

    • Octopus says:

      “Anti-anti-Islamofascist,” would be the correct term. Heh, it’s hard to contemplate such idiocy in supposedly learned cultural elites. 😆

  66. Octopus says:

    But, Fatass…your own in-house ululating freakshow, Furious Burka, said the “hategasm” was coming from both the right and the left. Why, even The New Yorker is pissed!

    Looks like you’re full of shit again. Dang. 😆

    • Arachne says:

      And what would that be, Fatass? Why don’t you give real-time examples of the freeflow of hatred and how it’s manifesting itself. Because your buddies at TPM have called all the folks in France a bunch of raaaaacists anyhow – and don’t you get your marching orders from them.

      Oh, and by the way, I just joined Amazon PRIME and ordered over $300 worth of goods – oh my, think of the royalties. Call me when one of your terror-supporting lackeys can match it.

    • just poop says:

      actually Charles you are doing exactly what the militants want

      cowering

    • just poop says:

      meanwhile his Hero Barry Drones the fuck out of thousands of civilians to get a few AQ foot soldiers, maybe

      just collateral damage right Charles?

      you know you wanna make an omlette, you gotta make a few eggs.