Charles downplays the declaration of the Caliphate

Today the Islamic State of Iraq and ash-Sham have declared the formation of the Caliphate with their leader al-Baghdadi as the new Caliph. At one time LGF was at the forefront about warning about the Caliphate being a goal of Sunni Islamic militants. Now Charles tweets a joke about the Caliphate while taking a swipe at Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.

Charles is a dishonest smear merchant.

Update: Aloutte compares the Tea party to ISIS.


Is Aloutte really believe this crap?



93 Comments on “Charles downplays the declaration of the Caliphate”

  1. Octopus says:

    Good one, Gus! 😆

  2. Octopus says:

    And Germany declared its annexation of Poland just to troll Western Europe.

    If there’s one thing I’ve learned about the Islamofascist terrorists in the past 15 years, it’s that they publicly state their true intentions. They declare their goals, to a disbelieving world, and then go about trying to achieve those goals by any means possible.

    The Left has refused to take the jihadis at their word, as that would mean their Moronic Convergence was a one-sided embrace of fantasy. Fatass used to understand that, prior to his Moronic Conversion. Now he’s worse than the worst moonbat-appeasers he used to pillory on a daily basis, for 8 years.

    • Daedalus says:

      Charles probably supports ISIS.

      • il padrino says:

        I don’t think he supports ISIS — he’s become a scumbag, but I don’t think he’s at *that* level. However, for reasons that elude me, he has utterly devoted himself to Obama, and as with everyone who’s that deep in the tank for the Current Occupant it is imperative he lowball anything that reflects poorly on him — and ISIS is possibly the biggest disaster to raise its ugly head from Obama’s horrifying foreign policy. CJ has invested so much in Obama he won’t admit a failure of this size until planes are smacking into skyscrapers again … and possibly not even them.

      • poteen2 says:

        Charlie doesn’t now, or ever has “supported” anything.
        He always talks against someone. Now and10 years ago. At best he’s a snotty bitch with a courage problem. And consistency.

      • Inspector Fromage says:

        when the 767’s start incinerating Americans again, Charles will just blame bush and the tea party


    • kbdabear says:

      Pammy, he just can’t quit you ….

  3. poteen2 says:

    They’ve beheaded hundreds and killed thousands just to piss off the woman who thought you were a fat nuthin. You’re still an idiot Charlie. A fat,slow,idiot nuthin. Good for you,,,,,,,,!

  4. Because here we go says:

  5. Because here we go says:

    • Octopus says:


      When everyone and everything is vicious, nothing is vicious. 😆

      • Because says:

        Sid is vicious.

      • Octopus says:

        Snot is viscous.

      • Because snot science says:

        Snot’s actually not viscous, because it’s not a Newtonian fluid. A viscous Newtonian fluid like honey will eventually run into a puddle. Snot will remain a blob until it dries out, at which time it becomes a booger. It’s a Bingham plastic. Like poop.

  6. Doppel milyo says:

    Nobody has ever seen Charles and Adam gadahn together in the same room

    I think they are the same America hating islam loving no pussy getting fat kids from California

  7. Because Onose says:

    • Doppel milyo says:

      second amendment zealots………… the founders

      fuck you Charles.

      you celebrate the right to vacuum a full term baby’s brains out as some implied right to privacy that doesn’t even exist in the constitution but you crap all over the real one.

      I watched a cool film last night called conspiracy. it’s about the meeting of Nazis when they decided who to and who not to gas. I can imagine Charles being at that meeting thumping his fist on the table and saying GASS TEH TEABAGGERS !

    • Because olo says:

  8. Octopus says:

    Everything reminds you of booze, Gus. You’re a dipsomaniac.

    • Octopus says:

      You’re not standing still. No, you’re sitting in front of your dim monitor, jiggling with rage because a mass murderer cited you as an inspiration. Jiggle-jiggle-jiggle! 😡

  9. stabby says:

    Pj hasn’t even mentioned the announcement of the Caliphate. I guess they’ve decided that winning elections is more important than stoking up the usual hysteria, so they think you shouldn’t talk about this. How odd. Geller would be in a tizzy about now right? Thrown under the bus?

    • Octopus says:

      Have they mentioned LGF lately, Stabs? Stoking up that whole hysteria thingy? Hey, how about Chunky’s obsession with Geller…he still jiggles with rage about that straight-arming, no doot. She sure threw him under the bus, back when he could still fit under a bus…

    • dwells38 says:

      Right, the whole Caliphate thing is such a nontroversy. Only hysterical people talk about. Like all these hysterical libturds I hear saying it’s 100% Bush’s fault.

    • stabby says:

      it takes a special kind of person to think he can rescue his reputation by lying about something that’s a matter of public record on the internet.

      That kind of reminds me of reading Noam Chomsky lying about history in some desperate attempt to convince Americans to have a totally isolationist foreign policy – what kind of ego thinks that by talking he can hide history?

    • stabby says:

      I mean on his own website he can win arguments by banning everyone who argues, but the rest of the world doesn’t work that way.

  10. Arachne says:

    Hobby Lobby decision has come down – in favor of Hobby Lobby.
    Someone better put attention whore Sandra Fluke on suicide watch.

    • Because neener neener says:


    • Just poop says:

      she would want me to pay for her Tylenol for the overdose

  11. dwells38 says:

    Poor Chunky. Just can’t run away from those 33 LGF cites by Breivek he uses to support his extreme views that led to a hideous mass murder. Especially when he had the gall to point the finger at the others on the list. Poor Chunk. It continues to be like a bad dream. As he tries to only trash his old successful blog, commenters and former blog friends, he mostly succeeds in trashing his own credibility and bringing to light his lack of character.

    How’s that rebrand going Chunk?

    .@SlimWiggy You should be aware that ‘ChenZhen’ is one of the stalkers who created the fake chart in question.
    6 hours ago

    ICYMI: Glenn Greenwald Smears Me by Citing a Faked Graphic from a Far Right Hate Site
    6 hours ago

    Fully expected they’d show up. As you know, since they stalk you as well. @Gus_802
    7 hours ago

    • Because olo says:

      • dwells38 says:

        Oh the smearyness! Oh the fakery! Oh the unfairness. Oh the unmitigated stalkerness of it all!! Poor old me. Hounded by evil stalkers.

        First they brainwashed me and made me post things and host comments I didn’t believe. They made me a TOTAL ASS! from ’01 to ’08! Then when I awoke from their mental manipulation and righteously broke with them after a very long, long, long period of trying to reign them in and reason with them (like, 3 weeks of bannings, burying posts and deleting comments) they then viciously, viciously and more viciously turned on me and now chase me and hound me and stalk me at every turn.

        Poor Chunky Boo Hoo.

      • Arachne says:

        Boy, for someone who is incensed over that chart, etc., he sure sends it out often enough. Um, you do realize, don’t you, Fatass, that every time you do that, you (1) look like a whiney toddler screaming for attention, and (2) elicit comments from people telling you that the chart is, in fact, ACCURATE.

      • ISpeakJive says:

        Maybe Chunky should do a throbbing overlay of the graphs. He’ll be famous again instead of infamous.

  12. Because off says:

  13. Juan Epstein says:

    Much Califat.

    The Big C. The real victim of Oslo.

  14. ChenZhen says:

    Our old pal lawhawk must be smoking something:


    (is that how that works?)

  15. dwells38 says:

    Wow I guess I missed that headline. I thought they just ruled that employers with religious objections can opt out of providing contraception coverage under Obamacare.

    Oh that’s right. Chunky can only express himself like a petulatnt 10 yr old girl who didn’t get her way and now proclaims Mommy and Daddy don’t love her.

    And just like that, SCOTUS has ruled women can be treated as second class citizens by religious fanatics.
    19 minutes ago

    Read more:

    • Arachne says:

      Perhaps Fatass should take a look at Sandra Fluke’s Twitter timeline and see how dishonest attention whores are being treated. But that’s okay, his echo chamber will rally round him and look and sound like idiots. Because why should today be any different.

  16. Juan Epstein says:

    Srsly though. “Anatomy of an Evil Smear”?

    GTF over urslf.

  17. Because Schadenfreude mit Benghazi... says:

    • Arachne says:

      As usual, in his haste to appear as a legal scholar, dumbass and the minions forget that the Hobby Lobby case was brought specifically as a religious freedom cases – that PRIVATELY held companies with strong religious beliefs on the subject of abortion cannot be compelled by the government to pay for them. It was a case strictly involving the use of abortifacients.

      And notice the “wingnuts” explode in Schadenfreude snot. I guess he missed the “libturds explode in frenzy of calls for arson and criminal mischief.” But then, expecting Johnson to be anything than a dishonest piece of shit is delusion on my part.

  18. Because Cheers! says:

  19. Just poop says:

    shame that the women that work at Hobby lobby will just have to resort to getting their free birth control pills at planned parenthood, of if they are too lazy to do that, paying the $3.50 per month at wal mart

    yes, libs should be foaming at the mouth over this. It’s a huge deal. it absolutely trumps the IRS targeting Obama’s political enemies, and ISIS declaring a caliphate


    • Arachne says:

      What is particularly hysterical is watching Attention Whore Sandra Fluke getting roundly punched out on her twitter time line for acting like such a drama queen and wanting to call attention to herself.

  20. Just poop says:

    what difference does it make?

  21. Because no, it's science, dip says:

    • Just poop says:

      ermagerd. like Charles is a doctor. like listen to him, and shit. he’s like a lawyer too, yo. Like he’s a legal scholar

    • Just poop says:

      Charles you ignorant fat fuck

      let me splain it to you since you don’t know what you are talking about

      Hobby Lobby covers 16 of the 20 forms of oral “birth control”
      however, they believe ( as does your pal The Pope ) that life begins at conception and that these 4 disputed drugs in fact, kill a human life ( just to write for you in crayon, that is a fertilized egg in other words after conception)

      Alito is medically correct

      Charles can you tell us when you graduated medical school and did your OBGYN residency and passed your medical boards. Also when you finished law school and passed your bar

      thanks in advance!


      • Arachne says:

        Exactly. And Hobby Lobby did what it is supposed to do in such a contradiction – they commenced an action stating “we need clarification – to provide abortifacients violates our religious beliefs. Can the government compel us to do so?”

        And the Supreme Court said “no, they can’t.” This is not a corporation with shareholders that went to SCOTUS – it was, in law, a “closely held corporation.” Of course, the Democrats, because they’re yearning for something to perpetuate their ridiculous “war on women” want to paint this as “the Supreme Court is denying access to birth control!” Well, unless Hobby Lobby is planting sentries at CVS, Walgrens, WalMart and Target, turning away employees of Hobby Lobby trying to obtain birth control, or unless they are requiring their employees to swear off birth control – ANY birth control – this hyperbole is just that – an overdramatic reading of the facts. This was not a birth control case – this was a first amendment case about the government’s overreach in compelling an organization that is owned by individuals who believe abortion is morally wrong to assist in its performance.

        The real problem is the hammered together “read-it-to-find-out-what’s-in-it” ACA is very poorly drafting legislation. Such a disclaimer on religious grounds for closely held corporations or religious organizations – could have very easily been fitted into the language and made all this unnecessary.

        The most interesting aspect of all the yelling and snarling today is that I have yet to hear from a Hobby Lobby employee – either by name or anonymously – complain that their right to birth control has been violated. And THAT is more telling than anything.

      • ISpeakJive says:

        Well said, Arachne. They are not “denied” anything, they can still get it and will. There won’t be one woman who goes without for the price of a frappuccino with whip cream. Ridiculous.

  22. Juan Epstein says:

    A gift:

    Haskins admitted to police that, on both occasions, he broke into the yard where vehicles were parked, incident reports from the Saginaw County Sheriff’s Department show. He said he pulled spark plug wires on sheriff, mosquito control and other vehicles parked there.

    “Jordan would remove the spark plug wires and sit in the car and masturbate while the motor was sparking and making noises,” the police report states.

    Haskins was charged with additional misdemeanor offenses related to a third incident at the mosquito control property in October 2010.

    According to that incident report, Haskins again said that he damaged county vehicles by pulling spark plug wires to “masturbate while cranking the engine.” Deputies said he told them the act is a sexual fetish he learned about online.

  23. osprey1 says:

    Chuck has declared his own Caliphate, the Cheeslamic Emirate of Culver, where he reigns as Caliph Chunkeh Al-Cheetoh.

  24. Because whip that straw man! says:

    • Just poop says:

      charles you Islamophobe!

    • Arachne says:

      They aren’t controlling anything, you ignorant ass. They will pay for 16 of the 20 mandated “birth control” forms. Will you please point, by the way, to the provisions in the Hobby Lobby employee handbook that forbids the employees from using birth control or abortifacients?

      By the way, in the 1970’s and 1980’s (didn’t need it by the 90’s so I can’t speak to it), birth control pills were not a covered prescription under my health plan, which means that if I wanted birth control pills, I had to pay full price and purchase them myself. This was pretty much true of the insurance plans for everyone else I knew as well. Planned Parenthood was available to get them cheap if you needed to but most of us, as I recall, ponied up the $25.00 every month to pay for them. Now, of course, you can get them dirt cheap – $9 at WalMart and Target. So spare me the righteous indignation. We got through the 70’s and 80’s just fine.

      • Because says:

        He didn’t. He had to borrow money that he never paid back to get a VW.

      • Arachne says:

        BTW, was that comment at Duke’s memorial blog really by Chaz, apologizing for taking the van? I always thought that was a put on (and gave Chaz the opportunity to make the blog ALL.ABOUT.HIM instead, but if WE didn’t do it, who did?

    • Juan Epstein says:

      Writing al-Qaeda instead of Islam was a nice touch.

    • dwells38 says:

      Gotta love the leftard progturd reasoning. So for some certain companies that opt out due to religious reasons, not all contraceptions will be available to women and they’ll have to foot the few bucks from their employer provided income. And that’s like al Qaeda?

      Chunk, you’re a fat stupid loser. Why don’t you buy pills for the women who contribute on LGF? They add value. Do you pay them? Or give them a discount on their account? If so why don’t you offer to buy thier contraception products? If you don’t please explain to us why you’re a bigot and a whacked out fanatic who wants to control their reproductive freedom? Why are you like al Qaeda?

  25. Because SUCKER!!! says:

    • dwells38 says:

      I think Chunky needs an OS update. He’s been very unstable since he “woke up” and became a progtard.

  26. JimboXL says:

    Why was it even 5-4? It should have been 9-zip. Contrast the libs reaction to this vs their reaction to Islamists cutting off heads as they tear through Iraq, no doubt some women and children have been caught in their path of destruction,

  27. Pakimon says:

    I can believe it.

    Poor MacPro.

    If I had to wake up and face yet another day of sniveling tweets and grossly incompetent coding, I’d lock up too. 😆

  28. stabby says:

    No one cares about the Caliphate. Over at PJ the commenters are all disagreeing with Victor David Hanson’s logorria for the first time ever, they have no patience for an old neocon calling for more intervention in Iraq.

  29. dwells38 says:

    And now with the outing threats! Brett Kimberlin/Neal Rauhauser much Chunk? What’s next. Are you going to start swatting people and wearing a neckbrace after someone touches your iPad?

    People who hide behind anonymous identities to smear and attack others online: is it fair game to out them? Asking for a friend.
    47 minutes ago

  30. dwells38 says:

    Because considering Obungle criticized Bush when he was running for Preezydent the first time. And six years later it’s worse than ever, why would I even question that there’s really a brand new accountability that won’t result in rewarding more unnecessary suffering and deaths?

    RT @IAVAPressRoom: Those responsible for manipulating or falsifying records at the VA & those who tolerated it are being held accountable. …
    4 hours ago