Charles makes a prediction for the 2014 election

Playing the role of a political prophet, Charles predicts the results of the 2014 election.

Bookmark this post and let’s hold him to his prediction.


80 Comments on “Charles makes a prediction for the 2014 election”

  1. Juan Epstein says:

    Here we go again.


  2. Because olo olololo ololololololo hahahaha hohohoho lolol lolololol says:


  3. Octopus says:

    Everyone missed it, because nobody gives a fuck about your bullshit fake tweet-mails, or whatever you call that idiocy. Grow up, Fatass. Get. A. Life.

  4. Octopus says:

    Those aren’t monsters. They’re just misled a bit.

    These are monsters!

  5. Because huh? says:

  6. Kurt's mid-term gains says:

    Charles, I can see why you are so popular and that your predictions are favorited and retweeted by tens of thousands

    You were after all , the only man who correctly predicted large Democrat gains in the house during the 2010 mid terms.


    • Octopus says:

      It’s heartening to know that lots of Dems are going to find themselves out of work after these elections, now that McDumbth has predicted the opposite. He’s unfailingly fallible. 🙂

  7. Octopus says:

    Chunky’s Moderate Muslims get another big kill, in Benghazi:

    Lovely people.

  8. Octopus says:

    …pales into nothingness compared to the horrors that were business-as-usual for your pal Kermit Gosnell, aka “The Butcher.” Talk about a war on women! 😯

  9. Octopus says:

    Easy, Chunky! It’s because they’re insane, too. Batshit-crazy.

    As is any woman who fails to endorse the most unrestricted, tax-payer funded, late-term or any-term abortion laws. Just insane monsters. Rabid, bloodthirsty, violently psychotic lunatics.

    Their pretend-concern for the unborn is just a cover for their real purposes: getting those babies’ blood for the special bread. 😈

    • Because shut up. says:

      I also think the First Amendment was in there somewhere. I know, old, dead white guys. Because shut up.

      • Octopus says:

        Getting mixed-messages, now. What’s your point, Sterno-Head?

    • Al-Cheezeera says:

      They are women who are betraying their gender!!!!!!!!1111

      Charles, you find EVERYTHING hard to understand when it doesn’t fit your narrow and biased views.

      I am sure that Supreme Court justices don’t, maybe, think about what is the RIGHT THING TO DO!!!

    • dwells38 says:

      Because unconstitutional is also really hard for Chunky Boo Boo to understand.

  10. Octopus says:

    Well…you saw it. A couple of lesbians in Queens, too. You should tweet them and talk about it!

  11. Bunk X says:

  12. Pakimon says:

    Dongo doesn’t know the half of it.

    Gus_802’s Twitter timeline is a veritable gold mine of unbelievably stupid tweets. 😆

  13. Pakimon says:

    I know how it “works out”.

    Gus sniveling and bleating on Twitter after the dudebros give him an “atomic wedgie” along with lots of “noogies”, “wet willies” and “indian burns”. 😆

  14. Speranza says:

    Yeah and the San Diego Padres are going to win the 2014 World Series defeating the Houston Astros.

    • Because says:

      And the hidden heat is going to come springing out of the ocean like a Jack-in-the-box, and the tipping point is nigh, REPENT!!!!!

  15. Because cool font science!!! says:

    • Arachne says:

      My favorite recent tweet of his:

      “Apparently the leading cause of hard drive crashes is subpoenas.”

  16. dwells38 says:

    Chunk was shoveling this shit for the leftists a few days back. All along it was purely a lie to try and damage Scott Walker. Not holding my breath for the apology.

    Scott Walker not a target, John Doe special prosecutor says

    The article for some reason says “However, that doesn’t mean Walker has been exonerated in the eyes of prosecutors, and he could continue to be a subject of the investigation if it is allowed to continue, legal experts said Thursday.” But isn’t that the point? Judges aren’t allowing it to continue because legally it’s just bullshit. They’re trying to go on a fishing expedition. To find a crime. Because so far they haven’t found shit. Hopefully this will backfire on the operatives like Chunk who have been pretending like Walker’s just a crook. And instead make him appear correctly as a victim of an over eager and reckless prosecutor and the usual progressive liars..

    Read more:

    • Arachne says:

      Fatass looks at headlines and doesn’t read articles. He’s all verklept at the Supreme Court decision on abortion clinics buffer zones and doesn’t bother to realize that all SCOTUS said was that the 35-foot buffer zone was “EXCESSIVE.” It did NOT say that all buffer zones were to be removed.

      He should marry Sandra Fluke. Dim-witted, ill-informed and utterly worhtless professional attention whores should always find each other.

    • Arachne says:

      Because being an over-eager prosecutor pandering to the Left worked out SO WELL for that dirtbag Mike Nifong….

  17. Because Onose. Teh VRWC SCOTUS. says:

  18. Because gee, that's swell, Goose. says:

  19. ISpeakJive says:

    Except Chuck of course, LOL

    • Because olo olololo ololololololo hahahaha hohohoho lolol lolololol says:

      olo olololo ololololololo hahahaha hohohoho lolol lolololol

    • Because olo olololo ololololololo hahahaha hohohoho lolol lolololol says:

      BRC, here’s your next thread. ^^^^^

  20. ISpeakJive says:

    Abortion clinics are free to build fences around their buildings, too, Gussy.
    His compadres are chiming in that more abortion clinics will now be bombed because the imaginary 35 foot line disappeared…….Oy.

    And Chunky chimes in that he can’t believe the women on the court don’t vote differently than the men on this, which would mean there no such thing as objective truth, which is apparently just fine by him! He never has been big on that or free speech, anyway. Also amusing to see leftoids call every justice on a liberal loaded SCOTUS a RWNJ.

    Then Goose lets loose a string of tweets, “Imagine if people counseled gun buyers at gun shops” or “Imagine if people counseled against obesity at fast food places.”

    Then it dawns on him and his dudbros 2 seconds later they could do that if they wanted, and conclude that would be a good thing. Not realizing that the buffer zones they hold dear would prevent that. So they are for the zones, then against the zones all within the hour! I hate this word, but “derp!”

    • Because says:

      Essentially, Chunk’s arguing that women on the court shouldn’t be expected to engage in disciplined legal reasoning. Because white males.

      Sotomayor may have gone to wall with that “wise Latina” comment, but even she isn’t willing to jump Chucky’s shark. Neither are the otherwomen, who FWIW are also Jews.

      Pretty pathetic, Chuck.

    • mfhorn says:

      Someone advising me not to buy a handgun, or telling me how eeeeevil I am for going to the range to blow holes in pieces of paper, will be politely told, in Irish, ‘Pog mo thoin’. Kiss my @ss.

    • ISpeakJive says:

      So, is Michelle Bachman’s picture a lookist attack? No? Crazy eyes aren’t like a big Adam’s apple, totally different. Ann Coulter can’t help her masculine looks, but Michelle can help her crazy eyes by shutting them, or something. Oy again.

      • Because says:

        Because we shouldn’t fear trans-fats? Speaking of fat…

      • ISpeakJive says:

        Side note: I could not care less if they make fun of either of them for whatever reason. Just don’t be a preening hypocrite.

      • dwells38 says:

        Yeah, don’t get the man thing with Coulter. She’s lanky and hot. Esp. for just a writer who doesn’t get paid to look great. She goes on all these Fox shows in skin tight skirts and looks just great. Even compared to the younger beauty’s like Andrea Tantaros.

      • ISpeakJive says:

        Yes, theoretically she removes any sexist reasons to dismiss her arguments because she doesn’t have cankles, doesn’t cackle, isn’t butt-ugly. So people have to deal with her ideas.
        Yet, they still carve out a sexist foothold on the Adam’s apple thing. Amazing.

      • Octopus says:

        The Pelosi Party should be permanently enjoined from posting any pictures, satirical or serious, that are intended to call attention to any opposing politician’s “crazy eyes.” That is all.

    • Because says:

      All hail the mad photoshop skillz. Or something. Is that what he learned in architect school?

    • Arachne says:

      Allan Brauer, by the way, is the same piece of shit that, during Cruz’s “filibuster” of the ACA, sent out a tweet to one of his staffers, saying he hoped her kids got sick and died. He was immediately fired from his job as the DNC-Sacramento communications chief.

  21. Octopus says:

    Sometimes, a fat old man with a ponytail gets lonely, and wonders where everybody done gone to. Are they hiding in the garage? Are they going to pop out and sing “Happy Birthday?”

    Nope. It’s just us, Chunky. We can sing you a song, if you like. This one.

  22. trebob says:

    The kids are having a blast with this nutbag from Perkins ( who said his opponent Congressman Lucas was dead and therefore not eligible to win Tuesday’s primary.

    They don’t know this guy had zip credibility anyway. I’ve been to Perkins. Not much up there but a bunch of sheep and guys with time on their hands. You know what I’m sayin’?

  23. mfhorn says:

    Hey Chuckles

    I’ll bet you $20 you’re wrong.

  24. rightymouse says:

    Charles. The master of gob-smacking irony & hypocrisy.

  25. Octopus says:

    We interrupt the funnin’ with Fatass for this important announcement: Dese kids are throwing a birthday party for George tonight, as he will turn 1 at midnight. I suspect they are throwing themselves a party, too, as they have purchased a quantity of wine and beer, and it looks like they’re expecting a bunch of people. It could get loud, later on.

    George sez, “Whip it. Whippet good.” (cuz he’s mostly whippet, we found out)

    • ISpeakJive says:

      Pics or it didn’t happen!!
      Happy Birthday, George!!!!!!!!!!

    • dwells38 says:

      Hopefully they got him a doggy safe cake made out of like, liver and horsemeat or something to put the candle. Sugar’s unsafe for the doggies.