Kragar spews bigotry towards Evangelical Christians

Far Left hate site Little Green Footballs tolerates bigotry and hate on its pages. Radical Leftwing bigot Kragar insults Evangelical Christians.

Evengelicals Bad Evengelicals Bad2

The hatred and displayed by Kragar is reflective of the bigotry encouraged at LGF.

Advertisements

85 Comments on “Kragar spews bigotry towards Evangelical Christians”

  1. Juan Epstein says:

    Only the white ones.

  2. Doppel standard says:

    Charles Icarus Johnson :is a coward. He allows antichristian Bigotry on his blog but if one word is said about another certain religion, that commenter gets the axe

    not so much that Charles likes one religion over the other. Charles is a soulless ghoul who hates all organized religion. He supports all anti-religious bigotry.

    what he is , is a coward. Afraid of seeming un PC and of course getting a letter applied to his back by a knife like Theo Van Gogh did.

    COWARD !!!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. Doppel standard says:

    I refuse to wade into that shitty blog and give him a single hit.

    anybody want to publish the list of the bigots at LGF that “updinged” this comment?

    Nice blog you have there Chuckles.

    So when one of your followers guns down a Sunday school full of evangelical kids, I suppose you will just claim ignorance to Kragar’s comment, right?

  4. Because says:

    Sounds like a description of Chuckles. Except he’ll whack you for Hunan rice.

  5. Juan Epstein says:

    Remember, it’s not technically NOT him posting it.

    It’s someone in the comments section. (The true purity test for all OTHER blogs)

    So if another leftist terrorists shoots up a conservative org’s offices, and they don’t just cite the SPLC as their inpiration, but LGF as well, he is not responsible in any way.

  6. Because spanking your monkey finally paid off? says:

  7. HaikuMan says:

    You know you’re old if you remember when @Green_Footballs was a ̶s̶u̶c̶c̶e̶s̶s̶f̶u̶l̶ blog.— Weasel Zippers (@weaselzippers) April 18, 2014

  8. Octopus says:

    Is there some kind of auto-posting mechanism on Twitter, or does Giant A-Haole actually take the time to retweet his idiotic bilge thrice? Because either way it’s still barking at the moon, in terms of meaningful.

    • HaikuMan says:

      He’s paid by the tweet.
      Even Soros’ paymasters
      Don’t read what Chuck says.

    • Because says:

      It’s either a script (it’s not that hard; even Chuckles can figure it out) or getting up in the middle of the night to piss and tweet.

  9. Arachne says:

    From Gus’s twitter feed: “Siouxsie & the Banshees – Kiss Them For Me”
    Really, Goos? “Siouxsie”? Sounds like a bigoted slight to Native Americans to me.

    • Because says:

      Isn’t Siouxsie the senator from Mass?

      • rightymouse says:

        HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

      • Arachne says:

        No, that’s Lie-awatha.

      • Octopus says:

        Aka, Running Joke. Running Joke For President!

        One day an Indian boy asked his father why people in the tribe had such odd names.

        “Well, son, it’s tradition when an Indian baby is born for the father to go outside and name the baby after the first thing he sees. Why do you ask, Two Dogs Fucking?”

  10. d&d says:

    What a surprise. Chunk and his website are run of the mill Idiotarian leftist hater morons. Notice the updings? Everyone at that hell hole is down with the hate and no one stops to think these are human beings that they’re bad-mouthing and generalizing about.

    It’s truly comical that Chunk has become the very Idiotarion leftist puke he used to rail against daily for most of a decade. Those were the days eh Chunk? Remember how you mocked daily St. Pancake (your term), Mama Sheehan as you called her, Arafish the terrorist, car swarms, Paleostinian photoshops, “Let’s give ’em a state!!!! and the endless splodey dopes, head choppers, school massacres, etc…? Remember when GW Bush was the bomb Chunk? And you were all for invading Iraq?

    Isn’t it weird how your iconic photo with the baseball cap is from that era? Don’t you want to update that to now, since you’re now a supposedly sane Idiotarian Marxist moonbat??

  11. Because WTF? says:

  12. Arachne says:

    Because :

    No, that was the Mormons. Or something that starts with ‘M’.

    I thought it was the Amish – using planes and REALLY going rogue!

  13. Because if you ever had sex with a female in your life, you'd know what a condom is says:

  14. OLT's If Stoopid Burned, You'd Be In Flames says:

    Re: Twitterwarrior Theatre:

    Stalker Charles, the Cardinal was right. You CAN buy birth control at a 7-11. On top of that, the BC you can buy there is also protection against STDs.

    I realize that you may have never been able to get your Rascal into a 7-11. I’m so sorry, Charles.

    • Assuming he meant the pill you can?

      • OLT's 7-11 Facts says:

        Why would I assume the Cardinal meant The Pill? Obviously no one buys prescription drugs at the 7-11, at least legally. Non-prescription drugs are usually available behind the store, though. It is my understanding that this has been going on since at least the ’70’s. Don’t ask me how I know.

        As I wrote without mentioning them specifically, condoms are indeed birth control devices and also protect against transfer of STDs. Condoms are freely available for purchase in any number of stores besides 7-11. Condoms do not ask, tell, know, care, or judge you based on where you want to put your penis. You can be LGBTQSRTUVWXYZ or just a fat bored horny failblogger fapping to pictures of Glenn and Pam. Condoms do not discriminate. And they come in colors, flavors, and sizes, so they are DIVERSE. It’s a veritable plethora of choices for your Anthony. Or his Anthony. Or hers. Or shmerz’. Wrap that rascal and get bizzy.

        We truly live in a land of miracles where one does not have to wait for the FedGov or one’s employer to “give” one something; one can simply get it, at almost any time day or night. May the Evangelical Christian God (who is apparently different from the others, according to Stalker Charles) and the Catholic God bless this great Nation. Amen.

    • Because says:

      Interesting that the Cardinal seems to know more about sex than Chunk.

      • Doppel Milyo says:

        Charles knows all about birth control, but he is opposed to it because he favors late term abortions

    • Arachne says:

      I guess Fatass isn’t up on his Catholic dogma as he likes to think he is. The only approved method of preventing pregnancy for Roman Catholics is the rhythm method. Period. Condoms are considered birth control to Catholics as much as the Pill is.

  15. Because 'the' Supreme Court? Dishonest much? says:

    • Doppel Milyo says:

      This month makes 17 years. 9 months now without global warming

      so fuck off Charles

      • Because says:

        In reality, Steyn will end up getting all this discovery in his separate action, anyway. This is a bunch of bumf in the overall scheme of things.

    • Arachne says:

      BTW leave to to the legal ignoramus to play Drama Diva over this. Of course, Mann suing Mark Steyn – that’s not harassment, is it, Fatass? You know, it’s sort of like the way you define stalking.

    • Arachne says:

      BTW chuck, having prepared discovery requests and done more motions to compel than I can count, I find it very very interesting that you and the rest of the Chicken Little AGW contingent are clucking so loudly at this. If, as you nitwits say, “the science is settled” and we’re all a bunch of science deniers – why are you all working so hard to keep unpublished research and emails from prying eyes.

      Not saying you can’t, and not saying the judge was wrong – but we have found in the discovery process that the more damaging the document, the harder you work to keep it out of court.

  16. OLT's Is Small Joke says:

    Arachne :
    I guess Fatass isn’t up on his Catholic dogma as he likes to think he is. The only approved method of preventing pregnancy for Roman Catholics is the rhythm method. Period. Condoms are considered birth control to Catholics as much as the Pill is.

    Stalker Charles’ dogma got run over by his karma.

  17. Because he's really got a problem with virgins, doesn't he? says:

  18. Arachne says:

    Because :

    In reality, Steyn will end up getting all this discovery in his separate action, anyway. This is a bunch of bumf in the overall scheme of things.

    Exactly. Because MANN brought the action against Steyn, and is not going to have any such protections when Steyn asks for all such research. You don’t get to claim someone has libeled you and then get to hide documents which may show that your stupid ass hockey stick is a fraud. Whether that research is published or not.

    • Doppel Milyo says:

      so I guess “hide the decline” won’t fly with the judge like it does with the dummies at the IPCC

      since Icarus got the ball rolling with his story above, I am sure when Steyn wins his case, that will be front page news at LGF
      /

      • Arachne says:

        Paul Alan Levy’s analysis of the Mann v. Steyn, NRO, et al. lawsuit, in case anyone has an interest.

        My reaction to the complaint was that although the Sandusky reference was plainly rhetorical hyperbole, some of the other statements could well be determined to be statements of fact that are provably “false” or “true.” Ken’s point that the statements have to be read in the context of the rest of the blog post is a fair one, but that might not be enough to get a dismissal on the face of the complaint as a matter of law, that each and every potentially actionable statement is opinion rather than fact as a matter of law.

        OTOH, it struck me that proving that the National Review’s position on the truth or falsity of those statements was expressed with actual malice — with reckless disregard of the probability that they are false — is quite likely to be an insuperable obstacle to recovery.

        But I also wonder whether Mann may hope to “win” his libel case a la Ariel Sharon v. Time, by getting a court to declare the falsity of the accusations of scientific dishonesty (or, as in Sharon itself, by getting such a declaration through special interrogatories); if that happens it may not matter to him whether he prevails on the actual malice issue, so long as his complaint is not dismissed under the DC anti-SLAPP statute. Of course, if he loses on that issue, his reputation might take a serious hit a la William Westmoreland.

        The defendants in this case will also have to think long and hard about whether to remove, given some strongly written opinions in the DDC rejecting the holdings elsewhere that state anti-SLAPP statutes are not applicable in federal court under Erie. I thought it was interesting that the National Review’s response to the demand letter made no reference to the anti-SLAPP statute. The remaining appeal in the DC Circuit is a weak vehicle for overturning that position (Public Citizen has filed as amicus curiae in support of applying Erie mind you, but there are some serious issues with the appeal that could easily derail the DC Circuit from reaching the issue).

        So yes, I agree with Ken — this case will be worth following. I also agree with Ken that there is serious reason to question whether a libel case is the right forum for resolving the truth or falsity of the detractors’ accusations against Mann, or about the attacks on his detractors.

        Mea culpa – attribution is everything: http://www.popehat.com/2012/10/23/michael-mann-sues-nro-mark-steyn-the-competitive-enterprise-institute-and-rand-simberg/

  19. Juan Epstein says:

    American Priviledge!

  20. Because I second that says:

    • Arachne says:

      The dumbest man in Congress? Does the name Hank “will Guam Tip Over” Johnson ring a bell?

      • OLT's LOLWUT Stalker Charles? says:

        Gohmert has accomplishments and honors.

        Stalker Charles can’t stand that.

    • trebob says:

      So let’s see Charles: You are a failed musician (you can’t make a living doing it), failed programmer (you can’t make a living doing it), failed blogger (you can’t make a living doing it) who self-admittedly was “duped” or “mislead” by almost everyone on the planet for at least the better part of a decade and you think that Louis Gohmert who has a B.A. from A&M and a J.D. from Baylor, former district court and appeals court judge with 5 successful elections to congress is dumb.

      As usually, everything Charles says and every opinion he has is 100% backwards/wrong.

  21. Because the race detective is on the case says:

    • Arachne says:

      I don’t know that I’d want anything that even smells like the Klan even in the same state as me (had enough of that in North Carolina as a kid, thank you), perhaps HuffPo can link us to their thread of righteous indignation about the Black Panthers brandisihing stick in the hope of intimidating white voters going to vote in 2008. I’m thinking I’ll need to pack a lunch if I’m going to wait for that.

  22. Because Senor Testiculo says STFU says:

  23. Because Chunky, you're such a card says:

  24. iSpeakJive says:

    Wut, without the LOL.

  25. rightymouse says:

    What the…????? This was at Familysearch.org

    Barack Obama, “United States Public Records”
    Name: Barack Obama
    Titles and Terms (Original):
    Also Known As Name: Barnhill Miner
    2nd Also Known As Name:
    3rd Also Known As Name:
    Residence Date: 01 Feb 1999-15 Nov 2007
    Residence Place: Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Birth Date:
    Phone Number: (312) 751-1170
    Phone Number Recorded Date: 15 Nov 2007
    Address: 14 W Erie St # 312
    Address Continued: Chicago, Illinois

  26. Arachne says:

    Hey Fatass – when PAAAAAM and Robert Spencer express outrage over this monstrous behavior, be sure to call them Islamophobes:

    http://weaselzippers.us/183539-syrian-jihadists-post-picture-of-them-pointing-guns-at-toddler-hostage-from-christian-village/#disqus_thread

    And Krager – THEIR Allah sanctions it. So go EFF yourself.

  27. Arachne says:

    OLT’s LOLWUT Stalker Charles? :

    Gohmert has accomplishments and honors.

    Stalker Charles can’t stand that.

    Same reason he’s so pissed off about Greenwald. Hundreds of thousands of followers, money for his start up blog, and everyone’s forgotten about Fatass. I’m sure his hope is that someone with a wallet with more than parking tickets and pot pie receipts will notice him and say “hey, let’s give this guy some money to go after Greenwald.”

    I’m convinced that’s why he’s so down on Breitbart – jealousy pure and simple. Andy grabbed the pop culture from the right and Jazzy’s stuck posting 10 year old pictures of himself so the chicks on Twitter will think he’s cool.

  28. Because he's got his flyover hate boner real bad says:

    • Arachne says:

      Hate Without End. Oh shit, is he back on Greenwald again?

    • Arachne says:

      I’m trying to think the last Senator affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan that led the GOP in the Senate. I’m sure it’ll come to me……sometime.

      • Pakimon says:

        Robert Byrd from West Virginia?

        Oh wait! You said “GOP”.and Byrd was a democrat.

        Imagine my shock and surprise. 🙄 😆

  29. JimboXL says:

    So his god would only throw conservatives into the lake of fire where they burn for all eternity?

  30. trebob says:

    Jim Hoff had this little diddy yesterday. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/04/this-day-in-history-republicans-pass-anti-kkk-act-outlawing-democratic-terrorist-groups

    Probably why Charles is all klannish recently.

  31. iSpeakJive says:

    Speaking of solid fellows:

  32. Because Oh Boy! Oh Boy! says:

  33. Minnow says:

    So… since I work for a living and cannot wile away hours here on the internet…. I wonder what became of Barry’s whine-fest re: His involvement in and his responsibility for the Breivik mass murders etc. etc.

    It looks as he may have thrown in the towel??