Pop-Up “Problems”

We’ve gotten our laughs from this before, since there was a time when teh Johnson decried the use of sneaky pop-up ads on websites as a “cynical, manipulative technique”. Fast forward a few years and we see that CJ proudly uses them as a nuisance in an attempt to garner monthly subscription rates that are more expensive than what Netflix charges.

Today, it would appear that CJ’s increased the pop-up attack, as at least one loozard felt like saying something:

aa cheap pay pop upsYep, if you think that it’s weird or off-putting that you get inundated with annoying pop ups with every click on a website, well, you’re just CHEAP!

The slightly uncomfortable exchange here forced Johnson to respond:

cj pop up probs


evil look into it



88 Comments on “Pop-Up “Problems””

  1. Abu Milyo says:

    When I read the exchange I thought the stick was coming out, but no. Weakness from Stinky? Love it.
    What Charles should look into is the thin content. Haha!

  2. Abu olo says:

    Is it fair to suggest Charles supports the boycott of Firefox because he’s, er, um, supportive of the cause? Or is it the $79.99 shakedown? Or both?

  3. Octopus says:

    I’m quite sure McDumbth did something, either to his bungled-code or the settings of his adware provider, increasing the pop-ups in order to achieve some kind of minimum hit-ratio. He’s a lying sack of goo, so take that into account when you read his weak excuses about this matter.

    Meantime, click on those Thai Ladyboys, and enjoy the diversity! 🙂

  4. Doppel milyo says:

    It’s not that the lizards are cheap, it’s just that the content is thin

    Charles must have hit a critically low mass of readers because criticizing the blog in any way shape or form, especially declaring that you will not pay Charles his ransom, is heresy and in days not so long ago, instant ban stick or at least a strongly worded time out

  5. I can’t believe I’m just now discovering this meme generator thing. It’s a hoot:

  6. Hey they even have one for Gus!

  7. MInnow says:

    Barry, you lie exactly (sniff) like my (sniff) ex-wife. “I’m pretty sure….”

    We believe you Barry – no – really, we do.

    (What is your “tell” when you lie Barry? My ex-wife would always sniff in a few times as she lied…. Even when I told this to her face, she sniffed and then denied it.)

    A good lib’, just like you Barry!!


  8. Octopus says:

    He only lies when he’s asleep or awake.

  9. Octopus says:

    I wonder if Chunky’s pannus reaches his knees, yet. Send us a pic, McDumbth! (j/k)

  10. d says:

    People who say things like “Will look into it” as if they don’t normally form complete sentences are usually trying to mask the fact that they’re lying, deceiving sacks of shit.

  11. Octopus says:

    “As if any wingnuts would waste the time playing a trick on the sorry likes of you,” he said, thumbing through his just-purchased, An Arsonist’s Guide To The Homes Of Moonbat Bloggers.

    • littlegreenxanax says:

      Charles CAN’T stay away from any sites that disagree with him just so he can have his outrage fix!

  12. Octopus says:

    What a fat load of pontificating doofus you are, Chunky! 😆

  13. Octopus says:

    I hear those Indian gals will ball for beads, McDumbth. They’ll drink all your 151, though. Hey, do I smell smoke?

    • Arachne says:

      Yeah, like that “Oneida Indian Leader” that was out front in the Redskins nontroversy. Except that he wasn’t an Oneida leader. Said the real Oneida leader. Just another Obama prop with no street cred. Of course, when the surviving Navajo Windtalkers, who HAVE real cred, showed up at a Redskins game wearing Redskins gear, they should be discounted as shills for Snyder, right Fatass.

      And here comes Fatass with his support for all those “Native American women” hoping for more followers and a guest spot on CNN. You know, if they ever stop focusing their newsgathering resources on a missing plane.

      • Because says:

        He thinks Warren is Indian, too.

        Really, he does.

      • Octopus says:

        Fauxcahontas is strongly against the Redskins appellation. I think she’s promoting the name, “Cheekbones.”

      • livefreeor die says:

        We were at that game. The crowd gave the Windtalkers a standing ovation. We also never engage in tomahawk chops or war cries a la the Atlanta Braves and Kansas City Chiefs but since the owner is a Republican, guess who gets hassled about their name?

  14. Pakimon says:

    I’m noticing a trend in The Chunkster’s tweets as of late:

    Desolation, abandonment and now loneliness.

    I guess being the premier corpulent ponytailed blogger of the internet isn’t all sunshine and rainbows… 😆

  15. Pakimon says:

    Fun Fact: Chunkles pronounces bologna as ” bow-log-naw”.

    • Pakimon says:

      Quick question for Gus:

      Does that “same old bologna” have a first name?

    • Because says:

      It’s “blog-na”. Like banana but about a blog.

      • Octopus says:

        It’s “tissue-nammy,” in case you were wondering. Also, recall his use of the word kaydurr, instead of cadre. He’s an illiterate doofus. 😆

  16. Pakimon says:

    Looks like “aagcobb” and “calochortus” haven’t figured out that Firefox with the AdBlocker plugin thingy yet.

    Oh…that’s right.

    His Holy Chunkiness has deemed Firefox “buggy” when used to read The Bog.

    Musn’t question the wisdom of His Holy Chunkiness, right guys? 🙄 😆

  17. Octopus says:

    That song is my jamjam!

  18. HaikuMan says:

    Charles noticed that too
    You mean that even Johnson
    Can’t find adBlocker?

  19. Juan Epstein says:

    No tweet about the pop-ups?

    • Arachne says:

      That would discourage people from ever visiting the select center for political discourse known as Little Green Footballs, doncha know?

  20. Because the vaxxers are greeny lefty vegans says:

    • Doppel dozen says:

      there is a great similarity between the anti-vaxers and the global warmists

      it’s a cult
      the science is settled. any questioning of their beliefs is met with some great big conspiracy theory
      anti vaxers have big pharms
      warmists have big oil

      they rely on emotion and not evidence
      they never consider that they are wrong

  21. Because says:

    • Arachne says:

      Fatass? Benghazi is the ONE subject people want answers for.
      Hey – how much did Obozo and the HHS shills shuck out for Obamacare – you know, to get people to sign up for such a popular program?

      Hey, and maybe you can explain it – you being the economic effing genius you are – tell me how 7,000,000 people, most of whom already HAD insurance before the Congressional Marxist Conference screwed them, are going to revamp the health system. They will be looking for new doctors, new hospitals and hoping that the former are accepting new patients.

      Now that the magical 7,000,000 has been reached, President Pusskie and his Flying Monkey Supersillious will no longer talk about the ACA – you watch. The praetorian media will be instructed that they are not to publish any horror stories, no accounts of dissatisfaction, to anecdotal evidence of people only signing up because they were terrified of the penalty. We are being asked to believe that somehow magically these 7,000,000 unverified signups will be paying for the entirety of the ACA.

    • HaikuMan says:

      Obama’s stonewalls
      are what cost the megabucks
      Save cash, tell the truth

    • d says:

      Yet he never shows any concern for the unabated runaway debt spending in his own state and at the federal level. Suddenly Chunk’s fiscally conscious when it comes to spending money to get to the truth.

  22. Arachne says:

    Hot Tuna from the Supreme Court today, folks (h/t to Mandy Nagy at Legal Insurrection):

    “The Supreme Court struck down limits Wednesday in federal law on the overall campaign contributions the biggest individual donors may make to candidates, political parties and political action committees.

    The justices said in a 5-4 vote that Americans have a right to give the legal maximum to candidates for Congress and president, as well as to parties and PACs, without worrying that they will violate the law when they bump up against a limit on all contributions, set at $123,200 for 2013 and 2014. That includes a separate $48,600 cap on contributions to candidates.

    The decision will allow the wealthiest contributors to pour millions of dollars into candidate and party coffers, although those contributions will be subject to disclosure under federal law. Big donors already can spend unlimited amounts on attacks ads and other outlets that have played an increasingly important role in campaigns.”

    I have a feeling Harry is gonna be VERY sorry that he’s been smearing the Koch Brothers.

  23. Because you shouldn't have canned Loody says:

  24. Because And...? says:

  25. Because Why Chunk hates Firefox says:

  26. d says:

    Because how much did you contribute, Gus? Enough to buy an iPhone or Suburu wagon?

    Here’s the answer kids. Contribute more money to your side instead of buying the next useless iPhone or 2015 Subaru wagon. 48 minutes ago

  27. Arachne says:

    What is fascinating about Fatass’s Twitter feed is that no one is really answering him. Tom Nichols, who is nothing more than a hack, is engaging, but no one else. Not really. He’s pretty much being roundly ignored. Of course, I imagine he’s blocked anyone who could engage him and kick his ass, which is, well, everyone, including the LOL Cats.

    But he has Tom Nichols and Gus. Heck, I get more response from one of MY tweets.

  28. Because says:

  29. Arachne says:

    Harry Reid may have now stepped in it up to the knees. He posted on his Senate webpage that the Koch Brothers don’t pay corporate income taxes, no doubt forgetting that his immunity from action for his smears only derives from the floor of the Senate. His webpage enjoys no such immunity (although that demented fool might think it does). And good luck trying to use SULLIVAN, Harry. Even if they were deemed public figures, and your vicious statements from the Senate floor may protect you from action, they most assuredly can be used as evidence of malice.

  30. rightymouse says:

    Charlie’s secretly jealous of the HAWT Todd Palin. 🙂

  31. rightymouse says:

    A reaction to our clever wordsmithy Prezzie:

  32. Juan Epstein says:

    Bro-Opt Twins! Tweetivate!

  33. OLT's That Lazy Obama Voter Still Hasn't Castrated Me, Either says:

    rightymouse :
    Charlie’s secretly jealous of the HAWT Todd Palin. 🙂

    No duh, as Todd can be assumed (via evidence of children) to be in possession of functioning male reproductive organs, something Stalker Charles lost in a recent flabalanche.

  34. livefreeor die says:

    Nice “pew, pew, pew” tweet right after a shooting at a military base, Charles.
    I guess killing soldiers is teh funny at the Swamp.


  35. Octopus says:

    Best hockey game of the year so far, as Wings take down league-leading Broons with late comeback. Word is, Datsyuk is on the verge of returning, possibly Friday. Impossibly optimistic word on Zetterberg, is that he’s planning to return from his post-Olympics back-surgery for the playoffs–that’s wishful thinking, but I’m okay with it. 🙂

    The most injury-filled season I’ve ever seen the Wings suffer through has paid dividends already, as the kids have stepped up in a big way. Squeaking into the playoffs, but watch out, if the stars come back and play the way they have in the past. Nobody is safe!

  36. Octopus says:

    Not much detail on the Ft. Hood shooter’s personal beef, but color me shocked if he doesn’t turn out to have Mormon-ish sympathies. I can’t believe this happened again.

    • livefreeor die says:

      Bammy was so upset that he made a statement between the two fundraisers he’s attending tonight.
      His complete disdain for the military is sickening.

      • Octopus says:

        Everything about that loser is sickening to me. I’ve tuned him out, pretty much. Just an empty suit, playing to an audience of wannabe-hipsters, with no grasp of history. A dark chapter in our nation’s history, no pun intended. RACIST!!!! 🙄