Achilles (Naso) Tang banned for criticizing Curious Lurker

With the disappearance of retired porn actress Iceweasel from LGF, the spot for the top female enforcer was open. Stepping into that very coveted role is Curious Lurker. She is Charles’ per Muslim and gives him legitimacy in efforts to show he supports Islamic causes. As he did with Iceweasel, he protects Curious Lurkers from potential critics.

Achilles (Naso) Tang seems to have butted heads withe the Furious Burkha on her pages. This rivalry has spilled over onto a thread yesterday.

Weasel vs Tang

Charles stepped in to protect his pet Muslim commentator.

Weasel vs Tang2

Iceweasel has clearly been replaced with Curious Lurker at LGF. She is the new female power and crossing her will get you banned.

Advertisements

82 Comments on “Achilles (Naso) Tang banned for criticizing Curious Lurker”

  1. Arachne says:

    The real question is…..will Stabby now show up pretending to be Achilles Tang?
    That beings said …. Hey AT! Come on over, we have the good beer – and COOKIES.
    Hell, you’ve already got a nic that will fit right in!

  2. Arachne says:

    Loved Blubberbutt’s “read some of the rubbish you’ve been posting.” Is he sure he wasn’t reading that bullshit Twitter feed of his by mistake?

    • Abu penis penis penis lol says:

      “… and I think I’ve completely had enough.”
      –Charles Foster Johnson

      Are you sure, Charles? Wanna think it over? Who the fuck talks like that, much less writes like that besides a moral compass less douche canoe?
      / using “that” to upset Charles, who never, ever reads here.

  3. rightymouse says:

    Another poster bites the dust. How many active ones are you left with now, Charlie? 😆

  4. Juan Epstein says:

  5. Juan Epstein says:

  6. LGFisapitofshit says:

    Makes sense the fb gets the head post. Chunk has no use for a criteria either, so they have that in common. Maybe that’s the root of the word Islamaphobic? Fear of cliterectomies

  7. Pakimon says:

    Wasn’t “Nasal Twang” the first of the e-mails outed by Walter a year or so ago?

    • ISTE says:

      Yep, so he probably hates us for that and now that Charles has banned him then the poor soul is cast adrift….

  8. Pakimon says:

    Chunky spares no expense when trying to maintain his pseudo islamic “bona-fides”. 😆

  9. Pakimon says:

    As an aside, I don’t believe for a minute that “BiCuriousLurker” is an actual muslim anything.

    I always figured she’s some fat, white, middle aged (definitely non-muslim) moonbat biddy putting on pretensions in a pathetic effort to gain attention.

    I’d bet “Achilles Tang” saw through her pretensions and that’s why he gave him/her/it a such hard time.

    • Pakimon says:

      But not Chunky!

      If someone started posting at The Bog claiming to be the ghost of Osama bin Laden, The Chunkster would take the claim at face value and promote whatever idiocy the dingbat posted to “The Front Page”.

      And post a few “ICYMI” s in the ensuing hours. 😆

      • Pakimon says:

        uUless of course it was something along the lines of, “Failed Corpulent Pony-Tailed Blogger actually believes I’m the ghost of Osama bin Laden. 😆

      • Pakimon says:

        *Unless

        Don’t know what happened there. I blame the Chunky Pony-tailed Blogger Conspiracy!

        (and a worn out crappy keyboard) 😉

  10. Pakimon says:

    If only Chunky would charge free admission to his blog instead of trying to ransom unwary internet travelers to pay$80.00 $79.95 to avoid his malware and sex ads. 😆

  11. Pakimon says:

    Let’s try again; I

    f only Chunky would charge free admission to his blog instead of trying to ransom unwary internet travelers to pay$80.00 $79.95 to avoid his malware and sex ads. 😆

  12. Pakimon says:

    I hate to “three-peat” but this is really irritating me.

    This time, I’ll get it right, Dammit!

    If only Chunky would charge free admission to his blog instead of trying to ransom unwary internet travelers to pay $80.00 $79.95 to avoid his malware and sex ads. 😆

    • Pakimon says:

      Finally!

      OK, time to take a break for the night.

      That whole “drinking and commenting don’t mix” deal. and whatnot… 😉

    • St. Pancake says:

      Why isn’t LGF free and decisions are made based on the will of the ‘village’. Charles Freeloader Johnson doesn’t have “his” blog. It’s the peoples. He’s a typical spoiled old white male Fucking racist!

    • HaikuMan says:

      And by the way, FREE ADMISSION for kids to the Creation Museum, starting today!

      Was nearby there once
      Considered going as joke
      Wouldn’t take kid, though

    • Arachne says:

      No worries – it’s probably the same number of times Fatass sent the same insipid message – you know, ICYMI……

  13. Abu penis penis penis lol says:

    ISTE :
    Yep, so he probably hates us for that and now that Charles has banned him then the poor soul is cast adrift….

    Yeah, adrift in mom’s basement.

  14. swamprat says:

    Pakimon :As an aside, I don’t believe for a minute that “BiCuriousLurker” is an actual muslim anything.

    Yeah, I am withholdng credulity on that, myself.

    Always seemed a bit “pat”.

    The song “burqa blue” springs to mind, also.

    • swamprat says:

      As a millonaire powerboat racer, I appreciate the freedom the internet gives us to reveal our personal information, as does my supermodel wife.

      • Arachne says:

        I and my husband, famous but unnamed Hollywood conservative actor (think early episodes of “Law and Order”) totally concur as we board our G4 purchased from our $600,000,000 PowerBall winnings.

  15. swamprat says:

    I find it amusing that charles was SHOCKED! SHOCKED, I SAY! to find out a member was posting things of which charles, himself, did not approve.

    Terrible, that.

    Nonsanctioned thought is doubleplusungood.

  16. swamprat says:

    Here’s an update;

    the comment in question is not posted in “bottom comments, BUT lurkers’ comment regarding it has the EXACT same number of dings, but upward.
    Thusly:

    CuriousLurker (27)
    re: #35 Charles Johnson Thank you. I’m gonna go put my Islamophobia Page back now…
    Read more at http://littlegreenfootballs.com/#RHasmvY0l4Iz98HW.99

    • swamprat says:

      posted at 1;01 lgf time, but lurkers’ wonderful, factual, lucid, nonjudgemental, inoffensive informative page is still not posted, that I can see. Maybe it’s just not showing; I don’t know the system.

  17. Because garage mahal says:

  18. Bunk X says:

    Arachne :
    Loved Blubberbutt’s “read some of the rubbish you’ve been posting.” Is he sure he wasn’t reading that bullshit Twitter feed of his by mistake?

    Nasal Twang was one of the good peeps in The Swamp.
    https://thediaryofdaedalus.com/?s=naso+

    • OLT's But He's Not A Sock, At Least says:

      He wasn’t all that good, but at least he was real.

      A brief scan of Bunk’s link will show that we’re “lost people” at a “stalker blog”. Naso was a real supporter of the great purges. Kind of like the people Stalin had shot last.

      It may be a while before he can detox from all the Cheetos.

      • OLT's It's A Pee Metaphor, Get It??? says:

        PS – I’m not lost – I’m at THE stalker blog.

        But do you really stalk something like Stalker Charles? He makes such a freaking public display of his dumbth that I don’t feel “stalking” is really an appropriate term.

        Bing Dictionary
        stalk·ing [ stáwking ]
        1.stealthy pursuit: the act or process of stealthily following or trying to approach somebody or something
        2.act of steady harassment: the crime of harassing somebody with persistent, inappropriate, and unwanted attention

        (1) is just not possible. You don’t need to stalk an assclown on a Rascal rolling the wrong way down a street in a pink cape, orange jumpsuit, and hijab, noodling a guitar. I mean, that’s pretty much the definition of “in your face”.

        (2) is just not defensible. “Unwanted attention”? When ICYMI is all day long, and the cries of persecution by “wingnuts” echo off the sides of the internets? No, Stalker Charles craves attention. Please love me, Mommy Pam! Please love me, Daddy Greenwald!

        In fact, if I’ve personally wronged Stalker Charles in any way after he actually stalked and defamed me (among hundreds), it’s been by giving him too much unhealthy attention. My name is OldLineTexan, and I am an assclown enabler.

        /Hi, OldLineTexan

        So, my dear Naso Tang, I’m not lost. I’m here, making the world a better, warmer, slightly wetter place for assclowns like Stalker Charles. It may not be much of a mark on the make-believe web-based world of fake Muslimas and self-righteous bitter old white fat-assed washed-up guitarists, but I think I’ve done OK for a cowboy astronaut millionaire. Somewhere, a tree grows in Culver City. And, on that tree, faint and barely recognizable, is my mark. Like a chihuahua’s best effort drowned out (literally) by an Irish Wolfhound, it ain’t much … but it’s mine!

  19. Doppel ICYMI says:

    naso poon tang, you should know not to cross al ISLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM at LGF.

    you just had your LGF Nick Berg moment, bitch

    so come on over and mock away in freedom

  20. swamprat says:

    Cool hand charles

    Wut we have here is a failure to communicate; liberally
    Ah dinit want it this way
    This is wut Tang wanted
    Well, he got it

  21. Because says:

  22. Because Boobies!!!!! says:

    • Octopus says:

      Because the daily life of posting one incredibly stupid tweet after another from the garage is so much nobler. 😆

    • trebob says:

      he, he, he. He said boob.

    • HaikuMan says:

      They can watch so much
      As they can afford to pay
      All their cable bills.

    • Arachne says:

      Sounds like Sweet Lemons reasoning to me, Gussy, since my guess is your dumpster isn’t wired for cable — you can’t have TV so you don’t understand folks that watch it. Of course, on the other hand, if you were tuned to MSNBC your point is well taken.

      Oh and what is this “road” trip you speak of? Hopping freight trains?

  23. Octopus says:

    http://news.yahoo.com/rare-owl-stolen-washington-bird-sanctuary-221651697.html

    Who blew up da owl?

    I suspect Furious Burka. The itchy, frustrated, cranky old batshit floozy.

  24. Octopus says:

    The Raspy Voice Of Painful Experience:

    Drinking a pint of Everclear every day does not equal having a glass of Merlot every night. 4 minutes ago

    I can say Everclear is more dangerous than Chardonnay. They’re both however, booze. 5 minutes ago

  25. Octopus says:

    But how can the snow be real, ,when AGW has made winter snow pretty much a thing of the past? Surely you can understand the conspiracy-theorists’ confusion, schooled as you are in the “Billions Will Die!!1!” theory of cray-cray climate chaos….right?

    • Because says:

      Dunno. Go ax Bill Nye. He’s the Science Guy and shit.

      True story. I was at an event a couple of weeks ago, and I met a retired Mechanical Engineering prof from U.W. I asked him if he knew Bill Nye from there, and he said “who?”.

      • Octopus says:

        That’s because “Bill Nye The Science Guy” is a fictional character. A media creation. He knows jack-squat about real science, as his blanket endorsement of AGW so clearly illustrates.

  26. Octopus says:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2552207/I-Philip-Seymour-Hoffmans-gay-lover-I-saw-freebasing-cocaine-night-died-says-Manhattan-writer-star-body.html

    Now, considering how free-spirited and open-minded all of Hollywood is, why on Earth would Hoffman feel such angst about being teh gay? I mean, he was utterly believable as Capote, Won awards. What’s the big deal, he enjoys some peen?

  27. Because it's Gus! says:

  28. Juan Epstein says:

    Phobia. An irrational fear.

    Like when a little Muslim boy points his fingers like a gun at you while you’re on your bike.

    Only someone with an irrational fear would find that threatening and warn the world.

  29. Medchemmer says:

    How far up Charles’ johnson was this tool?

  30. Abu bin Shoveling says:

    Global warmering has brought NE IL another 6″ of snow and we’ll have sub-zero temps for the next 6 days or so. I heard today that 65% of the US is covered in snow. Hockey stick my ass!

    • trebob says:

      Abu, it’s real simple. Trust me, I read everything LVQ said about global warmening and this cold spell only proves beyond a doubt that the warmening is happening faster than ever before.

      Think about your freezer and how cold it is inside it, then put your hand behind the freezer and see that it’s warmer. That’s where the global warming comes from, it goes from the inside to behind. So, the colder and snowier it is outside, the warmer it is behind your freezer, then the earth bursts in flames and billions will die.

      You know 4 out of 5 dentists have consensus that global warmening is caused by republicans. Just sayin’.

      • Because says:

        Is that because Republicans fart more? Because it’s not true. Vegans fart more. It’s the Vegans’ fault.

    • Doppel Milyo says:

      the melting polar ice and the boiling north pole is sending freezing air to Ohio.

      #theScienceisSETTLED

      • rightymouse says:

        Don’t remind me. We were hammered with snow last night & this morning. Blech. Tonight & tomorrow it’s just supposed to get very cold. Again. This global warmening crap sux. 😦

  31. rightymouse says:

    Good grief. GET A JOB!!!!!!!!!!

    • d says:

      Seriously. He sounds like he’s one rent payment away from homelessness. And he logs onto a blog every day where he’s told he’s white and over-privileged. What a dumbass!

  32. Pakimon says:

    Here Gus.

    Have some penis penis penis lol..for dessert.

    http://tinyurl.com/mzxvv5y

  33. rightymouse says:

    Well, thank goodness that was clarified. 🙄

  34. Because your point? says:

  35. ISTE says:

    What REALLY got Naso tang kicked out.

    23 CuriousLurker

    Sat, Feb 1, 2014 1:28:20am

    Y’know, in the past I didn’t want to spend any personal time utilizing my webdev skills to create a way where I’d be able to continue contributing here at LGF while circumventing the lion’s share of the silly bullshit trolling, but it looks like it might be about time for that to change…

    The “XXXXXX is calling me out on my bullshit. You MUST ban, block and delete XXXXXXX. If you don’t I will stop contributing and posting articles here. Your choice.” syndrome.

    Happens everywhere. Seen it before, experienced it before.

    if you follow my drift……..

    • Because says:

      Webdev? Is that like REGEX and shit?

      • ISTE says:

        MUTEX to be exact.

        Mutual exclusion
        From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
        For the concept, see Mutually exclusive events.
        “mutex” redirects here. For the computer program object that negotiates mutual exclusion among threads, see lock (computer science).
        Figure 1 Two nodes, i and i+1, being removed simultaneously result in node i+1 not being removed

        In computer science, mutual exclusion refers to the requirement of ensuring that no two processes or threads (henceforth referred to only as processes) are in their critical section at the same time. Here, a critical section refers to a period of time when the process accesses a shared resource, such as shared memory.

        In plain English “you can’t be serious on the Blogmocracy Open Over Night Thread at the same time the regulars are shooting the shit at each other and having fun”

        Mutual exclusion = Fun does not equal serious.