Beclownment

Charles states the obvious.

This is one of the few truthful statements Charles has ever uttered. This whole blog is based on Charles Johnson beclowning himself.

Advertisements

61 Comments on “Beclownment”

  1. Abu says:

    Charles is a black belt of self-beclownment.

  2. Octopus says:

    In the Oxford Dictionary, next to the term “self-beclownment,” there is a picture of Chunky McDumbth as the clown in Stephen King’s “It,” with Fatass beaming up from the sewer. It’s quite evocative.

    In other news, I see Our Fatass forgot to attack Jon Stewart for nailing Obama’s brownish ass to the wall, in regards to the NSA: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/stewart-skewers-obamas-nsa-speech-privacy-is-important-unless-we-decide-it-isnt/

    Had anyone else besides the lefty-clown taken such a position, Chunky would have posted five or more tweets about it, all begging for attention like the ones he posted about Michigan’s L. Brooks Patterson today. BTW, L. Brooks has presided over the third-most successful county in the country, and has personally sponsored a slew of major initiatives attempting to resurrect the socialism-wrought horror that is the Detroit Metro area. Meanwhile, the citizens of the fair city of Detroit have elected the likes of Kwame Kilpatrick to multiple terms, even as his crimes light up the headlines of the local leftist news-rag. Blame Whitey, though. But steal the bandleader’s van, right, Chunky?

  3. swamprat says:

    ICYMI

    RT @PeterGleick: Sadly, this is getting to be an automatic January tweet: Last year was one of the warmest years on record for the world. 32 minutes ago

    Was that the year they made this proclimation one month early, just before the cold spell that disqualified it?

    “One of the warmest years on record”
    Oddly, and suspiciously, lacking in specifics

    But certainly true; each and every year this proclimation is heralded no matter what the actually facts may be.

    • Octopus says:

      That’s just insane, Swamprat. Only an insane person would buy that bullshit. 😆

      Yeah, it’s going back down below zero tonight, here in Michigan. NYC and the rest of the east coast is getting creamed with a snowstorm and Arctic-type temps. Some reporters will rebel against their overlords, and report the truth. Most will keep their damn traps shut, and wait for summer, where they can blame every heatwave on Evil Mankind.

    • swamprat says:

      I surely enjoy a good self beclownment.

      I thought Obama was going to solve this. Didn’t he say he was going to heal the rise of the seas or something? Well, I’m waiting. It was supposed to start the day he got elected. I have yet to hear of his shortcoming in this field from the left or most true believers in global warming.

      Suprisingly, the rightwing grants that global warming has, indeed, halted, but according to the 14 or 15 year timeline they offer, It would appear to be a “Bush” achievement.

      Global warming as a ongoing fact = Obama unable to keep a promise.
      Global warming as an ending trend = Bush stemming a worldwide catastrophe.
      Pick one.

    • Bunk X says:

      I can’t speak for anyone else, but I thought I was warm last year. Ask the ladies.

  4. Octopus says:

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/is-this-the-greatest-red-eye-ending-ever/

    I enjoy Gutfeld and the gang’s schtick. This was a good ‘un, imho. 😆

  5. Octopus says:

    This is Classic Fatass 2.0! 😆

    Searcy is hilarious in his undermining of Hollywood Dogma, but this internet exposition is completely separate from his character on “Justified.” Fatass is parroting the dogmatic expulsion of all actors who refuse to conform to Traditional Hollywood Leftist Idiotology, as ordered to do by his superiors at Media Matters who issue the Waddling Orders. He’s so bereft of any kind of original thought, it’s gone beyond sad, and into the realm of tragic. 😦

    • Abu bin Verklempt says:

      How is it Mr. Charles-tweets-all-day-long suddenly, out of nowhere “encounters” Nick Searcy? Really? Mr. Searcy is well known to average non-tweeting folk like me. Does Chunky not understand Twitter? Discuss.

    • St. Pancake says:

      I might be looking forward to tonight’s “Justified.”

      Since chuckles is a freeloading penniless (Hello amazon sign-up scam) POS, it’s no loss. Advertisers are expecting viewers = BUYING consumers. He’s already going to buy Cheetos, and will mooch off others for the rest.

    • Doppel Milyo says:

      I’m waiting for Charles to say he knew ” nick” before Nick became a famous movie and TV star.

      like maybe Nick was tuning guitars when Charles was a below average rent-a-band-member

    • dezes157 says:

      The encounter sure as hell didn’t involve any tweets between the 2, and if it had, Chuck would be a steaming plie of goo when Nick was done with him

  6. Doppel B. DeMilyo says:

    Send in the beclown
    Don’t bother
    Chuck’s here

  7. Pakimon says:

    Little Green Footballs – Sponsored by the National Beclownment for the Internet.

  8. trebob says:

    Gee Charles, pray tell what exactly does self-beclownment look like? Does look a little like this:

    Perhaps it looks more like this:

    Are you sure you aren’t really Stabby?

  9. trebob says:

    Fine! Two tweets and my comment awaits moderation. Hmph

    🙂

  10. I wonder when the Chunk will weigh in on this little brew-hah-ha.

    "@civilwarcometh: @BrandonMArms @RedNationRising I'm past impeachment. It's time to arrest and hang him high. http://t.co/Li1e0fzCLi" Agreed— Joshua Black 2014 (@JoshuaBlack2014) January 20, 2014

  11. I wonder when Chunkles will weigh in on this little bruhahaha …

    "@civilwarcometh: @BrandonMArms @RedNationRising I'm past impeachment. It's time to arrest and hang him high. http://t.co/Li1e0fzCLi" Agreed— Joshua Black 2014 (@JoshuaBlack2014) January 20, 2014

    • Octopus says:

      That’s not going to go over too well. You can’t call for the president to be hanged, even if he is a SCOAMF. It just isn’t done. 😆

      • Black is getting piled on in the usual manner. Other blacks calling him a ‘house n****r’, ‘Uncle Tom’ and worse. The usual dims yammering about insensitive Republican Nazism, etc.
        Not using a tu quoque logical fallacy here, but it is fascinating that the calls for Bush’s impeachment, war-crimes charges,assassination, etc. were daily bleats coming from the mouths of these same finger-pointers. Two standards, two different sets of rules.
        And what does SCOAMF mean? Seen it but never deciphered it ..

      • OLT's It's A Twilight Zone Movie? says:

        Unless he’s GW Bush. Then you can say anything. You can even make a movie about assassinating him and pretending that the US turns into a Soviet police state under President Cheney. You know, like the one we have under President Obama. Which is good, by the way. Why, it’s real good he done that, ain’t it Ma???

      • Ahhh, makes sense, Abu. I bow to you, Sir.

  12. Octopus says:

    http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4635/climate_alarmist_and_hockeystick_inventor_gets_in_hot_water_after_more_hot_air#.Ut8H-9U5Cwg.twitter

    Climate alarmist and Hockeystick inventor gets in hot water after more hot air
    Michael Mann called a fellow scientist, but climate sceptic, “anti-Science” after her Congressional Testimony, but the tables have been turned on him in spectacular fashion

    by Climate Realist on 21 January 2014 17:53

    If anyone out there thought that scientists were a bunch of genteel, Queensbury rules respecting gentlemen-types they’ve obviously never seen climate alarmists and climate sceptics going at each other like their lives depended on it.

    That’s not to draw a parallel and to declare each side as guilty as the other. The “consensus” scientists are almost always the ones playing the dirty tricks and calling the names. But when the other side fights back, it’s not just instructive about the state of the “consensus” itself, it’s downright entertaining.

    Bring on Fred Singer, professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and director of the Science & Environmental Policy Project writing in the American Thinker. He’s got it in for Michael Mann — or “Hide the decline” Mike, as he calls him — director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University, inventor of the so called “Hockeystick” and one of the most famous climate alarmists in the world.

    What has got Singer all riled up is a recent piece written by Mann in the New York Times where he starts playing the victim about all the grief he’s got for the fact his theories have all turned out to be wrong, and an accusation he made against a fellow scientist’s testimony last week to Congress.

    Let the fun begin. Before he gets going himself, Singer brings in Ross McKitrick, a well known scientist who long ago trashed the whole Hockeystick nonsense for what it was. Responding to Mann’s New York Times op-ed, which was entitled “If you see something, say something.”, McKitrick retorted:

    “OK, I see a second-rate scientist carrying on like a jackass and making a public nuisance of himself.”

    Singer plainly thinks this is far too tame: “OK, I want to say something too,” he says.

    “I see an ideologue, desperately trying to support a hypothesis that’s been falsified by observations. While the majority of climate alarmists are trying to discover a physical reason that might just save the AGW hypothesis, Mann simply ignores the ‘inconvenient truth’ that the global climate has not warmed significantly for at least the past 15 years — while emissions of greenhouse gases have surged globally.”

    According to Singer, Mann had launched an attack on “the Senate testimony (Jan 16, 2014) of fiercely independent climate scientist and blogger, Georgia Tech professor Judith Curry.”

    She was none too impressed. And responded as follows:

    “Since you have publicly accused my Congressional testimony of being ‘anti-science,’ I expect you to (publicly) document and rebut any statement in my testimony that is factually inaccurate or where my conclusions are not supported by the evidence that I provide.”

    Surely Mann will Mann-up and respond to the challenge. After all, he wouldn’t be afraid of a serious debate with a serious opponent, now would he?

  13. d says:

    Michael Mann is a conman and has made bu ku millions on the global warming/climate change boondoggle. But Chunk is just a pinhead useful idiot who knows less about climate science than he does about what goes into those delicious crunchy cheesy things he shoves down his throat in fistfuls. Which is to say nearly nothing. And for that he deserves the offical Winter Storm Anus award:

    • rightymouse says:

      Yep. Mann, Charlie & Peter Gleick are foolish tools. It’s freaking freezing here in Ohio tonight. It’s 10 degrees with a chill factor of -1. Eff these global warmening morons.

  14. rightymouse says:

    Charles Johnson. An expert on restraining orders. Wonder how many he’s had? 😆

    • rightymouse says:

      Wendy Davis ain’t right in the head, let alone her heart.

    • Doppel milyo says:

      Charles ” Icarus” Johnson
      Climate scientist, poet, Obstetrician, Legal Scholar, Constitutional scholar, Religious Scholar, Computer scientist and Programmer, Photographer, Expert on espionage , astronomy and evolution who needs help thawing and cooking a piece of trader joes’ boxed salmon

  15. Zeus Crankypants says:

    Did I win the dickish award for 2013?

  16. Zeus Crankypants says:

    OLT’s Huffin’ at Puffins :

    Don’t get me wrong. Not beed-level lovable. Beed’s like a brain-damaged lundehund that pees on a carpet every so often but makes us laugh when he chases birds and falls down rolling.

    That’s strange… I use to eat Lundehund’s for small snacks.