Charles Johnson: “You should have heard what I said about Reagan in the 1980s.”

Charles Johnson’s hatred of Ronald Reagan continues to be on full display. He is angry at R.S. McCain’s post ripping into Charles Johnson’s talking points on Reagan and Apartheid. Rather than admit that his allegations that Reagan supported Apartheid and forced Mandela to ally with Castro were false,  he goes on the attack via Twitter.

Charles is just a smear merchant and is not a paradigm of deep thinking.

Advertisements

133 Comments on “Charles Johnson: “You should have heard what I said about Reagan in the 1980s.””

  1. WTFhappenedtoLGF says:

    I would find it wholly unsurprising to learn CJ was as big a clueless asshole in the 80s as he is today. Just slimmer.

  2. I Love Orange says:

    Can any one spot Charles in his orange romper suit in this video?

  3. Bunk X says:

    https://twitter.com/Gus_807/status/410233995394170880

    And from downstairs:

    And this:

    https://twitter.com/Gus_807/status/410231312973189120

  4. I Love Orange says:

    Mr Bunk.

    If Charles Johnson was William Hoge you would have been in court today and you would have had your penis penis penis LOL slapped and told to cease and desist.

    You MUST stop harassing Charles Johnson via Twitter and blogs (this one).

    The courts have decided in William (Fuckface) Hoge’s favor.

    P.S. Lee Stranahan is really raking in the money!

    your money……

    • Orange is the new black (racist) says:

      I just donated $10,000 to Lee’s latest venture…was that a poor choice of investments? Oh, well, it’s not the first time I’ve done that. In fact, if I could get a re-do on about $1.5M in investments right about now, the wife and I could retire to an island getaway or the tax-haven of our choice and live very comfortably for the rest of our natural-born days. Only problem with that, is that investments get made in the present, with a lot of risk, and no time-machine to foresee the future. Having no time-machine really sucks!!@!!

    • Bunk X says:

      Charles Johnson is not William Hoge, and I’ve given no bucks to Stranahan. All non-sequiturs my friend.

      Serve me a Cease and Desist, then. Poking fun at someone online does not constitute “harassment” and I’ve defended Charles’ right to privacy against true stalkers, despite the unwarranted damage he’s done himself via deliberate and un-deniable harassment of others.

      • I nub orange says:

        Oh, but poking fun at someone online DOES constitute harassment! Even ping backs have now been entered into case law as harassment, as have hashtags. Let’s see how long it will take Johnson to issue a similar notice. Or really, any liberal you criticize to do the same. I have popcorn waiting, because I assure you Johnson will probably do it first, compel identities because of butthurt, and at the very least shut this blog down citing Hoge’s very favorable Twitter/blog decisions.

        Enjoy the side you’ve chosen!

    • I nub orange says:

      Good point! It would be good measure if CJ started issuing “cease and desist” notices similar to mr. Hoge. It would shut this entire operation down in 30 seconds. Of course, since this blog’s supported mr. Hoge the entire time it should have no problem understanding that a defamation suit is part and parcel of conservatives and liberals these days. Mostly conservatives, though.

      • rightymouse says:

        Threatening blog owners/bloggers is not a wise idea. That’s a Kimberlin type of tactic & we all know how that’s worked out for him, eh?

      • I nub orange says:

        Rightymouse, I’d thank Hoge for the legal precedent he set. From now on, if you blog, tweet, or ping back someone, it can be considered harassment. More specifically, If it happened to Johnson, he’s now WELL within his rights to charge the FUCK out of anyone who talks about him.

        enjoy your teammate and the legal precedent he set down. And, if anyone wants to post an IP address, etc. it is all now chargeable, depending on the state you now reside. However, that probably won’t mean much anymore, because it’s now about finding judges that don’t understand the internet to award decisions with widespread ramifications.

        Hoge’s decision is a wide open door on what constitutes harassment, and if Johnson grasps is, I’d say the butthurt/legal costs might be severe.

    • Because Stanky Stanks says:

      Stanky! You just can’t resist stalking, can you?

      • Pakimon says:

        That fat, ponytailed, Cheetos eating P.O.S. would have as much luck shutting down this blog as he would at becoming relevant or losing weight.

        The fact that you’re squealing about it merely demonstrates that we’re getting on your nerves.

        Thanks for that.

        It’s good to know that the relentless mocking and ridicule of the endless tidbits of idiocy farted out by The Chunkster and his handful of imbecilic, basement dwelling, unemployed half-wits are still being noticed and reacted too with the appropriate sniveling after all this time. 😆

  5. Because says:

    Oshit. They dunnit now. They’ve gone too far. They’re spying on the WoW gamers.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/10/world/spies-dragnet-reaches-a-playing-field-of-elves-and-trolls.html?_r=1&

    Now Chucky’s children are under the magnifying glass.

  6. Charles, whatever you said about Reagan in the 1980’s was as ignorant and uniformed as anything you today have to say about him. Just stop, OK? Just give it a phookin’ rest.

    • Bunk X says:

      Charles got his political news in 1980 by watching SNL’s “Weekend Update.” That was back when SNL was still kinda funny.

  7. Orange is the new black (racist) says:

    I was ignorant about Reagan in the 80’s. So were a lot of us, who have grown up along the way. Fatass just licks his orange-stained finger with his orange-stained tongue, and holds it up the breeze. He’s a linker, not a thinker, so he can go wherever the orange-stained wind blows.

  8. Orange is the new black (racist) says:

    See, everything is cheesy, to our Porky Icarus. NTTAAWWT. Besides, it’s cheesy.

  9. Octopus says:

    A non-cheesy slice of truth: http://tinyurl.com/kmgvufe

    • Bunk X says:

      Yeah, kids! Forget school! Emulate Nirvana and you, too can learn to play crap music and off yourselves as a protest to the world!

      • Bunk X says:

        Or, Yeah, kids! Forget school! Emulate Dennis Rodman and you, too can be a basketball wizard!

      • Bunk X says:

        Or, Yeah, kids! Forget school! Emulate Snookie and you, too can be a TV celebrity without accomplishing anything!

      • Octopus says:

        You slightly missed the point of Grohl’s message, Bunk. 😆

        On the other hand, hey, why not? The world needs protesting, and 90% of music is crapola on a broken drumstick, so have at it! 😈

    • Bunk X says:

      Perhaps I did, and perhaps I don’t know who David Grohl is or why his opinion is important.

  10. Juan Epstein says:

    Aaaaaaaaand Cuba is great, we’re all experts, nontroversy.

  11. Because says:

    Pakimon :
    It ain’t easy being cheesy.

    … when your blog’s been taken over by Weezy …

  12. Because in Chicago by Obama supporters says:

    • Arachne says:

      By WHOM, asshole? Under what circumstances Legitimate gun owners? Or gang dirtbags? Where’s the DEM outrage over this? I’ll tell you where it is – hiding under the covers in blue cities in blue states.
      By by the way, how many have been killed by drunk drivers? Teenagers speeding in cars? Drowning in a swimming pool? Shaken by a relative.

      So how about you serve yourself a nice helping of shut the fuck up? Or have you recovered from the ass kicking you got re Reagan and Apartheid on Saturday.

    • rightymouse says:

      And over 3,000 children are killed by abortion per day.

      http://www.all.org/nav/index/heading/OQ/cat/MzQ/id/NjA3OQ/

      • Arachne says:

        Those aren’t CHILDREN, Mouse! According to Oblahblah and his sycophant Chucky, those are “PUNISHMENTS.”

      • rightymouse says:

        Yep. I saw the pics of dead aborted full-term ‘punishments’ in Gosnell’s House of Horrors. Was murder, pure & simple.

  13. Because holy asshole says:

  14. windbag says:

    Charles demonstrates his arrogance and ignorance by bragging that he’s been stuck on stupid for the past 30 years. Brilliant.

  15. Octopus says:

    I was wondering what Fatass was in full-on panic/defense mode about — turns out, the Unicorn Messiah was taking selfies at Mandela’s funeral. Always about him, eh? 😆

    http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2013/12/10/obama-taking-selfies-at-nelson-mandelas-funeral/

    Captain Chunky swings into action!
    RT @Lidane: If your impression of the #MandelaMemorial has anything to do with handshakes and selfies, you’re doing it wrong. Liberal media… 3 minutes ago
    One of my favorite things wingnuts do: take a photograph totally out of context and jump to wild conclusions about it. 22 minutes ago
    RT @DavidClinchNews: Don’t believe pics of @MichelleObama giving @BarackObama evil eye over Helle Thorning-Schmidt: dr.dk/Nyheder/Billed… … 26 minutes ago

  16. Octopus says:

    Speaking of “Me! Me! Me!,” isn’t it cute that Chunky’s found someone pretending to give a flip about his career as a backup jazzy guitar plinker? 😆

    @amy10506 There’s a discography on the Wikipedia page about me. It’s not really complete, but it has most of the major stuff. 1 hour ago
    @amy10506 That was the first record I ever played on. 1 hour ago
    @amy10506 Yes, I sure did. On Stanley’s “School Days” album. 1 hour ago

    • Arachne says:

      Fatass, there’s a Wikepedia page because you made up a Wikipedia page and you added your own discography. It isn’t like your massive fan base put it there.

  17. Octopus says:

    REAGAAAAANNN!!

  18. Arachne says:

    Oh, and Gus, please dig up the photo of Reagan shaking hands with that murdering animal Idi Amin. Because if reports are correct, Obama shook hands with Mugabe.

    “On his way to the rostrum, Obama also shook the hand of Robert Mugabe, the strongman ruler of Zimbabwe”

    He also shook hands with Raul Castro, and even bowed a little. Remember that Raul honored the Cuban pilots who shot down a plane carrying four American rescue workers.

    Of course, Gus, we all know that you’re a piece of shit. This tweet proved it. And seriously? Almost 80,000 tweets and you can’t get more than a 1,000 people to follow you? Duuuuuude.

  19. Arachne says:

    And how embarrassing seeing Cameron, Oblahblah and that blonde “leader” taking the selfie photo like they’re three preteens at a Justin Timberlake concert.

    And Christine Amanpour describing the moving performance of an American gospel singer as Obama’s “warm up act.”

  20. Arachne says:

    I nub orange :

    Oh, but poking fun at someone online DOES constitute harassment! Even ping backs have now been entered into case law as harassment, as have hashtags. Let’s see how long it will take Johnson to issue a similar notice. Or really, any liberal you criticize to do the same. I have popcorn waiting, because I assure you Johnson will probably do it first, compel identities because of butthurt, and at the very least shut this blog down citing Hoge’s very favorable Twitter/blog decisions.

    Enjoy the side you’ve chosen!

    Please cite the specific case.

    • Arachne says:

      BTW I suggest you read the decision in Falwell v. Flynt.

    • I nub orange says:

      hoge v. Schmalfaldt. Maryland case law. An @mention is contact. Pingbacks are contact. Hashtags are contact. When and if Johnsons issues a “No contact” I’d be worried.

      • Pakimon says:

        Too bad we’re not in Maryland or Chunky isn’t in Maryland.

        It might’ve been fun.

        As it stands, right now it’s all a bunch of flatulence and empty threats produced by some anonymous knucklehead who is slavishly defending an obese ponytailed irrelevant shut-in for some inexplicable reason.

        Now run along and go gawk at some Hentai porn or something… 😆

      • Arachne says:

        Maryland case law has no standing in California.

      • Arachne says:

        While you’re at it, dumbass, look up the doctrine of unclean hands.
        Pamela Geller
        Glenn Greenwald
        Robert Spencer
        Any of them ring a bell? Any of the smears Chucky did to THEM ring a bell? Or would you like to go back and find his “Pam Geller Harpy generator” post?

  21. Arachne says:

    rightymouse :

    Threatening blog owners/bloggers is not a wise idea. That’s a Kimberlin type of tactic & we all know how that’s worked out for him, eh?

    I have asked I Nub Orange to provide us the specific case. I don’t need the citation. I can look the whole thing up in Lexis/Nexis or Westlaw.

  22. calo says:

    I nub orange :
    Rightymouse, I’d thank Hoge for the legal precedent he set. From now on, if you blog, tweet, or ping back someone, it can be considered harassment. More specifically, If it happened to Johnson, he’s now WELL within his rights to charge the FUCK out of anyone who talks about him.
    enjoy your teammate and the legal precedent he set down. And, if anyone wants to post an IP address, etc. it is all now chargeable, depending on the state you now reside. However, that probably won’t mean much anymore, because it’s now about finding judges that don’t understand the internet to award decisions with widespread ramifications.
    Hoge’s decision is a wide open door on what constitutes harassment, and if Johnson grasps is, I’d say the butthurt/legal costs might be severe.

    Teammate, heh. Everything is always black and white to you, no grey areas allowed.

    Remember Hoge got a restraining order AFTER asking BS to stop @mentioning and emaing him. BS continued to do so.

    Now, pray tell me where The Johnson has asked anyone to cease and desist @mentioning him?

    • I nub orange says:

      So, calo, if Johnson issued the same you’d honor it? Because now you have to. No more @mentioning people. I don’t think any of you really understand what this means.

      • calo says:

        It’s ma’am to you, Sir :).

        Yes, I’d honor it if he did so, but he hasn’t.

        Twitter is just a vehicle to deliver information, thoughts and observations. If everyone on twitter gets all due happy there for @mentions, a new joint will pop up. Kinda likeMySpace.

      • I nub orange says:

        Oh, but Mrs. Calo this is not a decision based on that. As I stated before, Mr. Hoge argued twitter was a phone number and it was upheld. Not once, but twice. So, if Mr. Johnson wants to apply that he has a court decision in his favor.

        To take it a bit further, Mr. Hoge also argued that he should not be the responsible party and simply block the offender. He might also just enjoy perusing your TL. The court upheld that as well.

        Mr. Stansfield believes that your twitter account is likened to your phone number, it is considered “direct contact”. So, if Johnson finds this out, I would suppose that you’d be in hot water. If CA agreed with MD, and in at least DMV they do.

        Mr. Stansfield also apparently believes that images of someone posted on the internet that are repulsive are to be considered harassment. Again, another reason to take pause.

        He also agreed that hashtags about an individual are also a part of direct contact, and/or harassment. If Mr. Johnson decides he’s been defamed and harassed, I think there’s a pretty good prima fascia case for it based on that “conservative’s”decision.

    • I nub orange says:

      And…..The “Johnson” only needs to be aware of this legal decision to issue his notice. If he’s stalking your blog (and I know he is) it’s only a matter of time.

      • Pakimon says:

        Whoooooo! Scary!

        He ‘s gonna teach us evil meanies a lesson!

        BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

        What a putz…

      • I nub orange says:

        @Pakimon: He might just do it yet. And if he does, you can thank Mr. Hoge for the decision.

      • Arachne says:

        I nub orange :

        Rightymouse, I’d thank Hoge for the legal precedent he set. From now on, if you blog, tweet, or ping back someone, it can be considered harassment. More specifically, If it happened to Johnson, he’s now WELL within his rights to charge the FUCK out of anyone who talks about him.

        enjoy your teammate and the legal precedent he set down. And, if anyone wants to post an IP address, etc. it is all now chargeable, depending on the state you now reside. However, that probably won’t mean much anymore, because it’s now about finding judges that don’t understand the internet to award decisions with widespread ramifications.

        Hoge’s decision is a wide open door on what constitutes harassment, and if Johnson grasps is, I’d say the butthurt/legal costs might be severe.

        No, it really doesn’t bozo. The circumstances in Hoge case constituted email abuse – totally different. You’re not a lawyer, you haven’t the foggiest fucking idea how legal precedent works.

        No, this site isn’t shutting down any time soon and a dumb judge in Maryland isn’t going to change that.

      • Pakimon says:

        You’re going to be waiting a long while so why don’t you do something entertaining like see if you can cram an entire pineapple into your mouth to pass the time?

    • I nub orange says:

      Hoge got his peace order in Carroll County after striking out in Howard County, and almost striking out in Carroll County. He then hired Zoa Barnes (to what we must assume, based on tetyana Kimberlin’s revelation must’ve been at least 3k per). On appeal, Zoa was awarded a PO based on the evidence she showed to Judge Stansfield.

      It was Stansfield who also heard the extension order. It’s no surprise he decided as he did in the past.

      • I nub orange says:

        What should make anyone pause, is that even Hoge testifies that the bulk of his evidence was Twitter contact.

      • rightymouse says:

        That should especially cause Charles to pause considering his extensive Twitter trashing of people, lolwut?

  23. calo says:

    I nub orange :
    Oh, but Mrs. Calo this is not a decision based on that. As I stated before, Mr. Hoge argued twitter was a phone number and it was upheld. Not once, but twice. So, if Mr. Johnson wants to apply that he has a court decision in his favor.
    To take it a bit further, Mr. Hoge also argued that he should not be the responsible party and simply block the offender. He might also just enjoy perusing your TL. The court upheld that as well.
    Mr. Stansfield believes that your twitter account is likened to your phone number, it is considered “direct contact”. So, if Johnson finds this out, I would suppose that you’d be in hot water. If CA agreed with MD, and in at least DMV they do.
    Mr. Stansfield also apparently believes that images of someone posted on the internet that are repulsive are to be considered harassment. Again, another reason to take pause.
    He also agreed that hashtags about an individual are also a part of direct contact, and/or harassment. If Mr. Johnson decides he’s been defamed and harassed, I think there’s a pretty good prima fascia case for it based on that “conservative’s”decision.

    And, if I’m in hot water for being a mosquito in twittersphere, you better gird your loins, Sonny. Cuz you are in deeper than I am.

  24. Arachne says:

    I nub orange :

    That wouldn’t apply, IMO. This is about the internet.

    In your opinion? And you got your law degree where, bozo?
    Oh, yes it most certainly does. You are allowed to ridicule in a magazine, you are allowed to ridicule on television, and you are MOST CERTAINLY allowed to ridicule on the internet.

    • I nub orange says:

      No, you’re not. At least not in MD now.

      I don’t have a law degree. I’ve simply monitored the cases as I’ve seen them. The precedent is very clear….At least in Howard County, Maryland, you’d better heed a no contact measure. That would include blogging, tweeting, Facebook, ping backs, mail, etc.

      If this legal decision spreads to other states we’ll know where it came from.

      • calo says:

        The Johnson’s ego is too big to issue a Cease and Desist order on twitter. He draws in followers when slap fights ensue on that venue.

        It feeds his ban sticky narcissistic self as he blocks and pulls out the Rodan Race Card audio for his followers to hear.

      • Pakimon says:

        In the meantime I’m sure we’ll have a few more years to keep doing what we’re doing.

        Here, have a pineapple to “entertain” yourself while you wait.

      • iSpeakJive says:

        I think the Nub is wrong about blogging. You’d have to seek out a blog to read about yourself.
        The other items come to you via email, ping backs, etc. Those may be unwelcome contact if they are frequent enough to constitute harassment. Blogging would not be.

        My opinion.

    • rightymouse says:

      Yep. Ask Sarah Palin about ridicule in the press, on twitter, on blogs, etc. & then ask me about whether I cry a tear for or worry about Charles Johnson’s thin skin.

  25. Because Lolwut says:

    lolwut

  26. I nub orange says:

    Arachne :
    Maryland case law has no standing in California.

    But it could if it was cited. Being in another state doesn’t mean that the court wouldn’t consider another state’s argument. lol. We’re still the same country. There are state right, but there are also federal rights.

    • rightymouse says:

      So Greenwald, RS McCain, Breitbart, Geller can now sue Charles Johnson for harrassment? Wow!

    • Pakimon says:

      But it could if it was cited.

      A lot of “ifs and “coulds” in your fantasiesassertions.

      Let me sum it up so even stabby you can understand.

      “If my aunt had balls, she’d be my uncle.”

      But hey, dare to dream… 😆

    • Arachne says:

      Cited how? You are so woefully ignorant on how this works. This is a lower court decision in a Maryland district court – a STATE district court, not federal. In involved specific set of facts involving direct contact between the parties and the violation of a no contact ORDER. Fuckface lives in California – he would need to bring an action in California. On the basis of what? No California court is going to give him a restraining order because people here call him names and make fun of him.

      You really believe the California Courts give a shit about the circumstances of a single civil action in Maryland? Hell, you don’t even cite the results of a lower California case if you’re bringing suit here. This isn’t an appellate decision and therefore has absolutely no force of law or precedent.

      • Actually, dipshit, hoge won on appeal.

      • And again, my poor, poor misguided retard. You only need to ask Lee Stranahan, your toothless hero (and according to himself, Andrew breitbart’s best friend and protégé) exactly why he can’t mention his debit card thief’s wife’s name. There’s a reason, and it’s a reason that happened in CA.

        Stranny already salted the mines for you, and he did it before twitter.

  27. Hmmmm. What it boils down to is that Charles doesn’t like being ridiculed, right? Oh. My. Stars.

    • Pakimon says:

      and stabby is starved for attention again. 😆

    • dwells38 says:

      I don’t think it’s Stabby. Note how he’s growing angry with Archne and going all ad hominem name calling and shit. Stabby was usually pretty docile.

      Anyway, what damage could be done to Chunk’s failing blog and online reputation anyway that he hasn’t already inflicted on himself? I would guess the monetary aspect would be more embarrassing in public than the satisfaction of any victory.

      And this nub seems to imply Chunk’s going to go all Brett Kimberlin on DOD or something. Should Rodan expect illegal Swat’s too numb nub?

  28. Pakimon says:

    One more note and I’m done.

    The way Chunkles is spamming on Twitter in a desperate attempt to raise money by pimping his Amazon account, I seriously doubt he could afford a lawyer even if stabby er, the orange rubbing guy’s fantasy came true.

    Besides, orange is overrated, pineapple is the hipster’s choice nowadays.

    Avocado if you’re obese and sporting a greasy ponytail.

    Just sayin’… 😆

  29. Octopus says:

    I think ALL of the Swamp Defenders who show up here are actually Fatass himself. They’re all stupid like him, anyway. I mean, how stupid is Orange Nub’s argument? 😆

    • I nub orange says:

      Only as stupid as the guy who spent 10 grand on his interactions….and won.

      • Pakimon says:

        And that’s where your fantasy gets blown out of the water.

        Do you really think Chunkles has 10 grand to spend on “interactions”? 😆

  30. Arachne says:

    Nub is trying to make this out as a BIG decision when it is not. This is a specific set of circumstances, where there was a evidence of direct contact and harassment on Twitter and in email between the parties. Hoge claimed that his Twitter account was in essence the equivalent of a phone number and got a rather naïve judge to agree with him. This is NOT an appellate decision, and therefore cannot be cited as the basis of a lawsuit. You cannot use as the basis of your lawsuit a lower court decision in Maryland. You must bring suit as a result of the actions of a tortfeasor violating statutory code in YOUR venue. And let me tell you, this will not fly in California. This is the home of Twitter and Facebook. I imagine they do not like having this type of problem with users and the next time, you may see them requesting intervention. Their lawyer won’t be Zoe Baird. Their lawyer will be from Wilson Sonsini. And as much as I respect my fellow Cal alum, it will be like a high school football team facing down the Seahawks.

    • I nub orange says:

      Lol, you guys. Look up the case of lee stranahan and his debit card thief (convicted) wife. Alan boxer got a restraining Order on dat ass. Just look up alanboxer.com to ahead and cheer hoge but he, along with stranny have opened the door to anyone here getting fucked with for blogging.

      Don’t believe me? Ask the guy that scammed your asses for 600 bucks why he couldn’t even mention the name “Alan boxer” on the Internet for a spell.

      • I nub orange says:

        Btw, Alan was awarded his restraining order in crystal fucking clear cali4niyay. It couldn’t happen there?

      • iSpeakJive says:

        And it looks like the order was vacated and not renewed because it was judged to be free speech and not harassment.
        Why are you making me look this shit up? Snore City, USA.

      • Pakimon says:

        It couldn’t happen there without graphs.

        A lot of them. 😆

      • Arachne says:

        Wow. You’re really hysterical on this Stranahan thing, aren’t you? Sounds personal to me. Maybe YOU have made some statements somewhere that aren’t quite kosher and you’re in fact worried about being sued.

        I took your advice and DID look it up. The Marin County Judge in Boxer’s case unequivocally DENIED the request for a restraining order. You can read his decision here (you know, in crystal effing clear CALIFORNIA):

        Charles can bring all the lawsuits he wants. But it’ll cost him over $300 a pop to file ($400 in federal court and he’ll have to prove it has jurisdiction) and I think I can safely say the defendants will win on a motion to dismiss and be awarded costs.

        BTW, even in crystal effing clear California, the judge’s ruling in this case couldn’t be used to bring suit by Charles. Why? Because lower courts must rule on the facts as presented to them. Not the facts in another case.

  31. Octopus says:

    Oh, the Stranahan thing again. 🙄

    The chandelier will be dropping in 5…4…3…2…

  32. Arachne says:

    Also, here is the Maryland statutes that Hoge requested his Peace Order under:

    One of the acts prohibited by Maryland Criminal Law § 3-805 is (1) the use of any means of data transmission (2) via a computer or other electronic means (3) to send that data to a person (4) who receives that data (5) for the purpose of engaging in course of conduct (6) that alarms or seriously annoys another (7) with the intention to harass, alarm, or annoy the other person (8) after being told to stop and (9) without a legal purpose.

    No one here is sending data to Charles Johnson. Period. In Hoge’s case, tweets and emails were sent TO him in violation of the peace order. Unless I am sending a tweet or email to Johnson, which I
    NEVER do, he cannot complain.

  33. I nub orange says:

    Pakimon :
    And that’s where your fantasy gets blown out of the water.
    Do you really think Chunkles has 10 grand to spend on “interactions”?

    Oh, I’m totally sure you wouldn’t piss your diapers if Johnson issued you a “do not contact” notice on Twitter.

    I’m also 100 percent sure that Bunk’s pussy won’t swallow his panties knowing how easily Hoge has made it legal to touch you for blogging. Judge judy issued a decision? lol, no an appellate court in MD did. It was then upheld a second time. If someone wants to argue that doesn’t mean shit, please tell me more.

    Chunky doesn’t have 10K to spend fucking with you? Well, you have made this blog about fucking with him, and Hoge set the table for internet defamation. It would be hilarious to see that this blog was foisted on its own petard after defending the very people who have now argued (and won) that internet criticism is defamation and harassment. I have invested in popcorn stock.

    • Arachne says:

      It’s “hoist on its own petard”
      And no, dumbass, it was not “internet” criticism. In Hoge’s case it was violation of a peace order NOT to contact him. Hence the pingbacks. I don’t include Johnson on any of my tweets – he’ll have a tough sell in front of a judge.

      But hey darlin’ – why don’t you run over to the Blogmeister and tell him he should do what Hoge did. I’m sure with such a great case with the potential for damages he can find a lawyer real quick to take the case on a contingency basis. You apparently care more about what happened in the Hoge decision than anyone here – which begs the question – why are YOU so worried about what happens here?

      • I nub orange says:

        Oh, there is no doubt in my mind if your buddies kimberlin and hoge can waltz into court and get peace orders based on the Internet, it is only a small matter of time before this one ends up in small claims court. Lol. What state is this site registered in?

        Really, you should just blame yourselves should it happen. In a quest to simply conform to crony conservatism, you endorsed, sold and pissed on the first amendment, cheering hoge on as he marched into court to seal the fate of many.

        I’m not in the business of helping c. Johnson in life. If he catches onto the madness your teammate has reaped well, I guess the goose meets the gander. So, quip away on my grammar.

        I will say this. If hoge got a po on his flimsy evidence, and stranny’s father in law (also a hero of yours) got his po issued in ca, I’d say this blog might be fucked. But it’s at the whim of Johnson now. He control your fate.

      • dwells38 says:

        Bravo! You’ve put the criminal ex-con Kimberlin and the turncoat Chunky in the same category of needing to go to the courts to attempt to silence people speaking the truth about their pasts online. AWSOME!

    • Arachne says:

      No dumbass. A LOWER court in Maryland did. You do not take testimony at the appellate level. Appellate panels are more than one judge.

      • I nub orange says:

        No, dipshit. Again you fail at even the most simple legal concepts. Hoge filed charges in district court as a pro se litigant and lost. He then appealed, and with zoa Barnes won in a circuit court. Schmalfeldt appealed to the Supreme Court of md but was denied hearing there until his circuit court case had been rendered. So, dipshit, you are wrong. Not surprising.

    • Pakimon says:

      You should have invested in Cheetos stock.

      You’re not very bright, are you?

  34. Arachne says:

    “Judge judy issued a decision?”

    Wow. Too dense to even get the sarcasm. Why don’t you go trot off to the Swamp and offer yourself as legal counsel to Charles Johnson so that when he files his big cease and desist against us you can get a cut of the profits.

  35. I nub orange says:

    Arachne :
    Wow. You’re really hysterical on this Stranahan thing, aren’t you? Sounds personal to me. Maybe YOU have made some statements somewhere that aren’t quite kosher and you’re in fact worried about being sued.
    I took your advice and DID look it up. The Marin County Judge in Boxer’s case unequivocally DENIED the request for a restraining order. You can read his decision here (you know, in crystal effing clear CALIFORNIA):
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/2885502/Alan-Boxer-v-Stranahan-Denied
    Charles can bring all the lawsuits he wants. But it’ll cost him over $300 a pop to file ($400 in federal court and he’ll have to prove it has jurisdiction) and I think I can safely say the defendants will win on a motion to dismiss and be awarded costs.
    BTW, even in crystal effing clear California, the judge’s ruling in this case couldn’t be used to bring suit by Charles. Why? Because lower courts must rule on the facts as presented to them. Not the facts in another case.

    Actually, you are quite wrong on that. Lee’s debit card thief wife even admits to the po being issued. It was issued over alanboxer.com. Lee and Lauren were told to shut the fuck up and not blog about mr. Boxer. At all. Ever.

    On appeal they overturned the po, but it did exist that lee and Lauren were not aloud to blog about mr boxer. Not twitter, but blogging.

    As for suing, lee fled California in a wake of unpaid debts that Texas (oh, how creditors love that shithole) will not honor. Should lee decide to pursue civil action in ca and win, he would immediately be met by lenders that sook summary judgement and won. Liens, etc. lee would have nothing other to claim.

    See, the thing about defamation is that it’s not defamation if it’s true. It’s only harassment if you keep pressing it. Lol. I wonder now.

    • I nub orange says:

      http://youtu.be/ffEWFNEXPnQ loo. Does this make it fucking clear?

      • Arachne says:

        Nope. Why hasn’t he demanded it be removed from YouTube?

        Why are you so worried about Stranahan? Sounds to me like you’re worried about him suing YOU. You come here and act like you need meds screaming for Chucky to sue us. Okay, so email Chucky and tell him to sue us. Won’t Chucky take your emails? I’m telling you based on my experience Chucky loses. Your mileage may differ. What the hell do you care.

    • Arachne says:

      It was issued over alanboxer.com? Sorry, I get that server doesn’t exist. I think I’ll go with the order of the judge in Marin county that said “NO.”

      You can always request a PO be issued and one will be, pending the hearing. In that case, yes a PO would be issued. Once there was a hearing the judge decided nope, no PO, continue on. Unless you have information to the contrary.

      What I’m failing to comprehend is why you are so upset about this? You are practically hysterical in your hope that Chuckie sues this blog. I say let him. I say it dies on a motion to dismiss.

      And by the way, use “retard” in a post one more time, and I will be taking my edit stick to you, your nic, and anything else I can think of, got it?

      • I nub orange says:

        Yes, you fucking mongoloid. The fucking po was issued over Lauren’s fucking blog! Do you fucking comprehend or do you just read the words and assemble as you wish?

      • iSpeakJive says:

        And the PO was vacated. It’s easy to get a temp one. A lot harder to make it stick. It didn’t stick. Or didn’t you read your own link?
        And, why so upset, honeybuns? You’re gonna pop a rivet.

  36. Arachne says:

    BTW, Tool, I’m leaving for another thread, so don’t claim victory and depart the field. Come over there if you like. Continue your hysteria to an empty room, if you like.

  37. I nub orange says:

    iSpeakJive :
    I think the Nub is wrong about blogging. You’d have to seek out a blog to read about yourself.
    The other items come to you via email, ping backs, etc. Those may be unwelcome contact if they are frequent enough to constitute harassment. Blogging would not be.
    My opinion.

    Your opinion is wrong. Based on hoge v. Schmalfeldt, hoge argued the same thing kimberlin did… That one could sign up for something like google alerts and be harassed or annoyed every time he was mentioned. In hoge’s case he argued this about pingbacks.

    • iSpeakJive says:

      My opinion is not wrong.
      Frequency matters as does content.
      Clownish mocking a few times a month on twitter is different than rabid obscene spew 100’s of times a day AFTER a PO was issued.
      Apples/ oranges.

  38. I nub orange says:

    Arachne :
    Nope. Why hasn’t he demanded it be removed from YouTube?
    Why are you so worried about Stranahan? Sounds to me like you’re worried about him suing YOU. You come here and act like you need meds screaming for Chucky to sue us. Okay, so email Chucky and tell him to sue us. Won’t Chucky take your emails? I’m telling you based on my experience Chucky loses. Your mileage may differ. What the hell do you care.

    The website is removed from the Internet you batshit crazy bitch. Wtf do you think the po was lifted over? Stranahan’s smile or his wife’s squeaky clean record? Are you this stupid in real life or do you really walk into court and argue that you took the handicap spot because you could not see the clear markings on the pavement and the clearly marked sign?

  39. calo says:

    I nub orange :
    Oh, there is no doubt in my mind if your buddies kimberlin and hoge can waltz into court and get peace orders based on the Internet, it is only a small matter of time before this one ends up in small claims court. Lol. What state is this site registered in?
    Really, you should just blame yourselves should it happen. In a quest to simply conform to crony conservatism, you endorsed, sold and pissed on the first amendment, cheering hoge on as he marched into court to seal the fate of many.
    I’m not in the business of helping c. Johnson in life. If he catches onto the madness your teammate has reaped well, I guess the goose meets the gander. So, quip away on my grammar.
    I will say this. If hoge got a po on his flimsy evidence, and stranny’s father in law (also a hero of yours) got his po issued in ca, I’d say this blog might be fucked. But it’s at the whim of Johnson now. He control your fate.

    I’m not sure WHY you are rooting for CJ to due anybody here. It strikes me as curious.

  40. I nub orange says:

    Arachne :
    Nope. Why hasn’t he demanded it be removed from YouTube?
    Why are you so worried about Stranahan? Sounds to me like you’re worried about him suing YOU. You come here and act like you need meds screaming for Chucky to sue us. Okay, so email Chucky and tell him to sue us. Won’t Chucky take your emails? I’m telling you based on my experience Chucky loses. Your mileage may differ. What the hell do you care.

    Oh, ok. It’s not crystal fucking clear, coming out of the mouths of your toothless criminal heroes that a po can be issued for simply blogging about someone. Lol. The sheer amount of denial and outright lies that you must have had to swallow down just to make that statement,,,

    You poor, poor sycophant.

    • calo says:

      That just makes me want to toss Stranny 50 more bucks.

      😆

      You got a day off work today?

    • iSpeakJive says:

      You are a fanatic, Nub. Not good. Not healthy. You need to stop obsessing and get some balance in our life. You are a tortured soul. Poor Nub.

  41. Pakimon says:

    I think nubby’s head is about to explode.

    First Britney and now Chunkles the Corpulent Ponytailed Asshat.

    LEAVE CHARLES ALONE!!! 😆 😆

  42. Pakimon says:

    But it’s at the whim of Johnson now. He control your fate.

    Someone set us up the bomb. All your blog are belong to us. 😆