Charles Johnson’s New Definition Of Bogus Is Bogus; Update: RS McCain links to this post and Charles whines about it!Posted: May 16, 2013
Charles Johnson’s Comment 23 was featured in an earlier post, but it’s worth further examination, given the content of his follow up ass-covering clarification just 38 minutes later.
In this case, Johnson was referring to the latest ballooning Obama Administration scandal (deploying the IRS as a weapon to thwart conservative groups filing for non-profit organization status). Why did he need to backpeddle? Because the facts are not bogus.
Even Little Master Rumpswab knows there’s more to the story, just like with Benghazi, Weinergate, Pigford, ACORN and numerous other stories that the Magical Jazzy Ponytail was completely wrong about. All those stories were initially declared as “bogus” in Johnsonville, and now Charlie needs to be careful because he’s been so wrong so many times his shoe soles sport permanent pecker prints.
Aside from that, Johnson’s re-definition of the word “Bogus” doesn’t exist. Here’s the Merriam-Webster Dictionary definition:
Neither is the word “Bogus” defined as “vastly overblown,” nor is there any synonym that remotely resembles the phrase. Sorry, Charlie, you don’t own definitions, but let’s adopt your version for now. What else (besides your bizarre obsession with Pamela Geller) have you declared as “vastly overblown” instead of “fraudulent?”
AND MANY MORE.
Charles, you’re a petulant self-absorbed and self-contradicting pathetic #Rumpswab with absolutely no credibility with which to criticize anyone. You’re flopping around like a 60 year old banked carp, and both the left and the right are quietly amused. Congrats.
P.S. Your rigged LGF view stats counter is still as bogus as your Twitter image.
Update: Robert Stacy McCain posted a funny.
Update II: Charles now whines about RS McCain’s smack-down!
Poor Charles, RS McCain is picking on him! Man up Charles. you talk garbage, people will call you out on it!