Charles denies Obama is preparing Zingers for Romney

Charles has a post up that says Romney is preparing Zingers for Obama in the upcoming debate. Killgore Trout points out that all politicians prepare zingers. Charles denies Obama would do such a thing.

Charles then makes a claim that all of us who have observed him know is not true.

I highly doubt Charles was ever on a debating team. He can’t debate in the blogosphere, so how would he in real life? Charles also backed down from a debate challenge by Andrew Breitbart. Charles is not a debater and looking at this exchange with Killgore, he is intellectually dishonest.

[Updated images for clarity.]

91 Comments on “Charles denies Obama is preparing Zingers for Romney”

  1. ISpeakJive says:

    They have wars over the stupidist crap over there.

    Chuck? Pedant much?

    If Obama isn’t memorizing any zingers it also means he ISN’T doing a zingerless debate strategy? If you say so, doofus.

  2. Kurt's 47 XXY hairless zinger says:

    Charles, you say Romney is preparing zingers?

    and you know this how?

    but all that charles heard was “ZINGERS”
    and he went
    “mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm SNACK CAKES…………WHERE”????

  3. Kurt's demon's very own demon. Don't mess with the demon's demon! says:

    charles is quoting the NEW YORK TIMES as a source

    this is the same source that claimed he had a fiance’

    / birdcage liner

  4. Kurt's hairy left palm says:

    charles was and remains a MASTER DEBATER

  5. LGF is better when ChiaChuck posts he spent time correcting his coding errors.* Makes him feel “regular”. Problem is he’s a DewludedCheetosDewbottleurinallyingsackofDurbin.
    * “YHY” = Pam’s ( . ) ( . )

  6. livefreeor die says:

    I can’t imagine Charles lasted long on a debate team given the tantrums he throws when someone challenges him.

  7. RTR's Rude Awakening says:

    Chuck’s right. The zingers are all preprogrammed into the telly. Some 20-yo punk making $172,000 a year is going to push the right zinger button at the right time. And leave a booger on the button.

  8. Kurt's busy writing charles a love letter says:


  9. Mark says:

    The level of Johnson’s hero-worshiping of Obama is truly staggering.

    • iSpeakJive says:

      He’s a true believer.

    • dwells38 says:

      It’s fake BS. This fucker’s taken a viscious lurch toward the cynical. That’s what this is all about. He doesn’t care about the left. But he does care about punishing the right when they wouldn’t follow him. I’ve been saying it for awhile. The best explanation for CJ’s big turn is his innate vindictiveness. He has a mean streak a mile wide and when he’s perceived that he’s been crossed, he turns that on his enemies. He couldn’t give a shit about any of these issues. It’s all about him and punishing those on the right who supposes are still appalled at his not-so-new anymore leftward direction. What’s sad is he thinks it’s still hurting anyone. Sadder still is what a pathetic commentator he is from the left and that he’s attracted no one of pith to help him like in the old days when the blog was anti-jihad right.

  10. garycooper says:

    Of course, Obumessiah is above such low behavior as prepared zingers. He’s a man of great intellect, who doesn’t need a teleprompter, and does his best public speaking off the cuff. No, wait… 😆

    Chunky’s a lying sack of manure. He was never on any debate team. He clearly hasn’t got the first clue about how debates work. You don’t win by flipping the table over, and bidding your opponent, “Adieu.”

  11. garycooper says:

    This was a pretty big local story a few months ago, the young woman who kept receiving food stamps after winning the lottery. Well, now she’s not.

  12. garycooper says:

    Ladies and gentlemen, Chunky McQueeg is walking like a giant on the land.
    1 hour ago

    They thought it was a mild earthquake, his neighbors…it was just Fatass, waddling down the driveway to fetch his Culver City Intelligencer.

  13. mrpaulrevere says:

    For whatever its worth I was also a member of high school and college debate teams and that level of debate is all about evidence (and discrediting your opponents evidence) and logic, reason and persuasion. They don’t do ‘zingers’

  14. mrpaulrevere says:

    Another yank on the pony tail:

    Killgore Trout Sat, Sep 29, 2012 1:14:38pm


    I also predict that if Obama does get a good zinger all the people insisting he’s not working on zingers will think it was the most devastating zinger ever in the history of zingerdom.

  15. garycooper says:

    I love me some Red Zinger!

    Best herbal tea ever.

  16. Liz_Ardoid says:

    Here’s a “zinger” of Charles ‘two dinner’ Johnson:

    • mrpaulrevere says:

      That clip was masterful I mean the SOB threw a verbal smoke grenade. He talked but said very little.

    • RTR's Rude Awakening says:

      What’s this “shouldn’t have a loud voice” shit? I don’t remember the word “loud” in the First Amendment.

      Maybe the constitutional professor can ‘splain it.

    • rightymouse says:

      What a maroon… ::lol:

    • dwells38 says:

      Wow. He’s fat. Someone needs to tell him that that straight part and ponytail thing makes him look Auntie Em. Or Emily Litella.

      And note already he’s questionning free speech. The little stupid fascist fuck.

    • snowcrash says:

      This can’t be the same guy, he looks nothing like his twitter profile picture. /

  17. Kirlz says:

    here’s something else you don’t see everyday…

    • dwells38 says:

      Wow. At first I thought “what is this bullshit” but the underwater gunshots look cool. Then I realized they make the art out of the bullets shot underwater. Very remarkable! Thanks Kirls! We humans are amazing.

  18. garycooper says:

    Is that an Islamic Rage Boy photobomb? Or is it a different rage-filled seether?

    Today, Chunky would post that pic (:14) and say something like, “These good Muslims are freedom fighters we should support, in whatever way necessary. Don’t let me hear any racist slurs against them, or you know what.”

  19. Pakimon says:

    Quick! Somebody flip on The Cheetos Signal!

    There’s racism afoot!

    Look up in the sky! It’s a blimp! It’s a morbidly obese pony! It’s…..The Husky Race Detective!

    Racism could sway the election

    • dwells38 says:

      Oh yeah you mean by all the blacks voting for Obama just because he’s black and whether or not they’re for naive socialistic policies that wreck our economy and shit?

  20. JimboXL says:

    It is frightening to what extent they’ve been Obatomized. I think this illustrates that indeed Obama phone woman represents 90% of Obama supporters. Any negative whatsoever about their god Obama and they just flatly deny it. If you said Obama goes to the bathroom like every other human they’d probably ask “how do you know that he does?”

    I can guess the debate will start like this: Modrator– “Mr. Romney, you tried to kill your wife, yet she’s still alive, do you consider that a failure?” We know this debate might as well be moderated by Nancy Pelosi and it would be as fair.

    • Pakimon says:

      I wouldn’t worry about the debates too much.

      Romney is an experienced debater and Obama is not.

      Despite the propaganda from The Left and the “Eeyore had-wringing” from some on The Right, Obama is a poor speaker without his teleprompter.

      I think Romney knows (unlike McCain in 2008) that the moderators are going to be tossing softballs at Obama while winging fast balls at his (Romney’s) head and is fully prepared for it.

      Also, no matter what the outcome of the debates, The “unbiased media” and the brain-dead morons (i.e. Chunky and his sycophantic minions) on the left side of the blogosphere (and the chronic Eeyores on the right side of the blogosphere) will declare Obama the victor.

      Fortunately, the only people they’ll convince are the zombies that are going to vote for Obama no matter what so it really doesn’t matter.

      • Arachne says:

        They’re already proffering excuses for why Obama will probably LOSE the debate. My reason would be because he doesn’t know SHIT unless it’s written out for him ahead of time.

    • Pakimon says:

      Strong>Moderator: Mr. Romney, you cruelly stuffed your dog in a pet carrier lashed to the roof of your car. Care to explain yourself?

      Romney: It was either that or take my opponent’s course of action and eat him.


  21. Pakimon says:

    Apparently it’s racist to comment and laugh at the video showing that nitwit shrieking about her “Obama Fone!!!!”

    No, You’re the Racist, or Blogging About Obama Phones

    The Chunkster is really dropping the ball on this one.

    If he doesn’t “step it up’, he might have to turn in his Race Detective badge and dog whistle decoder ring. 😆

  22. Speranza says:

    Charles Johnson’s idea of a zinger
    “Creationist, creationist!”

  23. danrudy says:

    Debate teams have water boys?

  24. haysoos says:

    debate team?
    what school? what college?
    intellectual dishonesty?

  25. windbag says:

    Chucky’s high school debate club experience…

    Stinky: Hey, ponytail boy, give me your lunch money.
    Chucky: No.
    Stinky: I’ll beat the ever living shit out of you if you don’t.
    Chucky: No.
    Stinky: Shut up and give me the money.
    Chucky: Creationist Nazi.

  26. rightymouse says:

    Debate Moderator: Governor Romney, you put your dog on the roof of your car in a carrier. Didn’t you think that was cruel?

    Romney: Well, we did think about eating him for dinner, but we figured that was REALLY cruel, not to mention uncivilized.

  27. SpaceAllah says:

    I did debate in high school. And I can guarantee that Johnson has never been a part of any debate team at any level. The reason I say this is that sometimes in debate you lose, perhaps to any myriad of reasons – say you’ve been given an untenable position to try to defend, and this does hapen. Anyway, I am sure Johnson will claim he never lost, as that fits right in with his neurotic inability to ever admit he was wrong in any way.

    I’d love to engage Charles in a real academic style debate with an impartial judge. He’s too lazy to do real research, and he’s not bright enough to formulate a strategy, and talking points from DailyKOS, Think Progress, and Huffington Post don’t score points.

  28. buzzsawmonkey says:

    Anyone who knows his subject matter, is secure in his own skin, and is reasonably articulate does not need to “prepare zingers.” He knows what he wants to say going in, and can trust to his own skills to turn the discussion as he wants it.

    With this in mind, it would not surprise me to learn that Obama is “preparing zingers.” He is a dull-witted man, not particularly articulate, intellectually lazy and grossly uneducated and over-credentialed. He is precisely the sort of person who would have to learn “zingers” by rote.

  29. Abu bin Squid says:

    Obama plans to “debate” about what W left him and tell Americans Romney is Bush III. Thankfully our education system has produced millions of crtitical thinkers so no one will believe him.

    • rightymouse says:

      Yep. The theme will likely be: “The economy & our relationships with other countries were sooooooooo bad none of us could have foreseen just how awful everything really was. Now give me four more years to prove just how stupid & gullible y’all can be”.

  30. the original doppelganger says:

    Charles the debate champion chooses to engage in an argument with kkkilbore lout that the toad lover simply cannot win.

    mr portland kelp can’t possibly prove what Obama is really doing and charles knows that. so even if obama throws out a few zingers charles can say they were off the cuff and not “memorized” and violin boy can’t prove they were.

    charles is no debater. he’s a fucking lazy coward that picks battles he cannot lose and when confronted with an argument that he can’t win, he simply says “whatever man” or ” piss off and I bid you adieu”

    lazy fat fuck

  31. the original doppelganger says:

    on the debate team, charles was the guy who collected and washed all the jock straps of the actual debaters

    let’s make that clear

  32. snowcrash says:

    Highly doubtful Johnson has ever been on a debate team. He does not deliver skillful arguments in posts or comments and his live interviews have been miserable. Iceweasel did the same crap at Amanda Marcottes blog when she said she was in the porno industry. Calculated one upmanship ( lying liars who lie) to get street cred. and win arguments.

  33. dwells38 says:

    The only thing I disagree with in that exchange is Killgore’s assertion that Obama’s team would be too ignorant or remiss to prepare the time-honored zingers. They are that stupid and unproffessional from what I’ve seen. If Obama gets re-elected it will be in spite of his stupid and amateurish campaign staff.

    Oh yeah and Charles comes off like a naive moron as he feigns ignorance that any self-respecting person over 40 knows is common knowledge.

  34. snowcrash says:

    I don’t care about zingers, snippy little replies or gotcha comments. The backhand slap, Newt Gingrich style was something else entirely. I did enjoy that. He had total command of the facts and was merciless in delivery. I bet he has debated in college. Know who else has debated and has excellent oratory skills? Ted Cruz. That’s right, future Senator (R) TX.

  35. dwells38 says:

    Oh hey and where the hell’ Chen? Hey Chen just because we’re a bunch right wing assholes and such doesn’t mean we don’t like intelligent liberals making snark from the left. Please come back and post something funny/smart/witty that trashes Charles. You are one of the pillers here and the place needs you! Don’t disappear like Nils who also needs to come back!! God knows (if He exists) we don’t need more of my comments. LOL!!

  36. dwells38 says:

    Wow. I saw the Katy Perry movie last night. I know what some of you are thinkin: Lecherous old guy leering over young, fresh, beautiful pop gorgeousness. It wasn’t like that at all. First off, I didn’t want to watch it. I like sci-fi thrillers. But I was vetoed by twin 13 year old girls who have HAD IT with sci-fi thrillers. Anyway she’s such a fantastic chick and trooper and just a big beautiful babe that I enjoyed. Her older sister is one of her handlers and at one point they dressed her up as the the KP nerd in the video Last Friday Night and put her out on stage with Katy. It was crazy awsome because the family rezem made them like twins. And the doc captured her split with Brand who’s a shallow dick as one would expect. That chick works her butt off and I wish her the best. ‘Nother cool thing about the movie is where she goes to Japan and you realize she’s like a goddess to many of them. An unreal, unattainable, unachievable slice of perfection. But behind the scenes you see she’s just a big cute girl next door with great singing talent. Nothing more. Gotta love a great American story.

  37. Liz_Ardoid says:

    Here’s some more Charles Johnson-“zingers”, this time from a 2005-interview:

    Additional info for this video:

    Some snippets of a 2005 interview with Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs, before he ‘parted ways with the right’. Also snippets from his blog, including the old LGF banner, apparently depicting a pro-peace ‘moonbat’ (also known as LLL = Loony Liberal Left on LGF) seeking shelter in the arms of a jihadi, both fearing the bouncing Green Football.

    Complete interview at:

  38. Arachne says:

    dwells38 :
    College? Did he not study music? I don’t know anyone who studied music and also participated in college debates.

    I don’t recall Asspimple ever mentioning college. Debate teams on the college level come out of the Speech and Philosophy disciplines – collegiate debate is highly skilled and highly competitive and it’s not trusted to “music majors” – it involves outlining and research – LOTS of research – both pro and con, because often you were not given which side of “resolved” you were going to be handed until you got there.

  39. gizbot7 says:

    Chunk is a dumbass for many, many reason — but I am really starting to wonder if intelligent persons should avoid Kool-Aid and Cheetos at all costs. Just in case.

  40. snowcrash says:

    I like this.

  41. snowcrash says:

    Gonna try again. Thank you for your patience. lol

  42. RTR's Rude Awakening says:

    Speaking of high school debate teams…

  43. Bunk X says:

    Although none of Chuck’s bios mention any college he attended, he mentioned the debate team in 2002.

    00060250 04478 140 Charles Mon, Oct 21, 2002 5:53:51am

    About Neale Talbot: all I need to know about him I learned shortly after his last sputtering attack on LGF, when he described suicide bombers as “noble.”
    You’re a disgusting human being, Neale Talbot, and I consider it an honor to be feebly attacked by a morally empty sleaze like you.
    About Anil Dash: when I was on the college debating team, my coach told me that it is a total waste of time to attempt a debate with a dishonest opponent. And Anil has quoted blatantly out of context, misrepresented others’ viewpoints, twisted others’ words, and refused to deal with a single substantive point raised in reply to his holier-than-thou pronouncements. At one point in our last run-in, Anil came right out and said it — “I am a more moral person than you.”
    Anil, you are a deeply dishonest debater, probably because somewhere in there you realize that your arguments are specious. I will not be deleting posts or banning people on your say-so, and I sincerely hope that it drives you crazy. It won’t be a very long drive.

    Seems to me the BRC did a search and came up empty handed. This suggests that
    a. CJ attended a community college, and/or
    b. He never graduated.
    His first record with Stanley Clark was released in 1976. Chuck was 23 at the time. A lot of practice went in before he got that gig.

    Another fun fact: Chuck had an L.A. band in the late 80s “Catzeye” that never got a recording contract.

    • RTR's Rude Awakening says:

      This is a brilliant tautology:

      Anil, you are a deeply dishonest debater, probably because somewhere in there you realize that your arguments are specious.

      Something tells me he wasn’t the master debater that he’s pretending to be.

      He and Fauxcohantas have something else in common.

      • Bunk X says:

        And Charles has quoted blatantly out of context, misrepresented others’ viewpoints, twisted others’ words, and refused to deal with a single substantive point raised in reply to his holier-than-thou pronouncements.

    • Abu bin Squid says:

      Was Chuck still wearing his yellow overalls in the late ’80s? Wait, don’t answer.
      In retrospect, it’s easy to see Charlie never really left the left with his classic liberal demonizing bent: “morally empty sleaze”. The projection is a window to Chuck E. Cheetos’s soul. penis penis penis lol

      • RTR's Rude Awakening says:

        The yellow overalls are a window to Chuck E. Cheetos’s penis. Soul soul soul lol.


      • Bunk X says:

        He wasn’t wearing them in London 1984 with Al Jarreau. He’s hard to spot in the vid – the cameras focused mostly on the black guys in the band, but you can spot him occasionally from the back or with his head chopped off.
        16:50 he makes a face.

      • Bunk X says:

        At 17:12 you can see that the 31 y.o. Chunk had already begun to put on weight.