Arabic, for Lizards

Recently, the very active (and allegedly Muslim) lizard “CuriousLurker” penned a rather interesting LGF Page:

(or, for our tweet addicts):

Now, I say interesting because, as a netizen familiar with the history of LGF, I seem to remember the Grand @Lizardoid himself “using and abusing” these terms not so long ago. Of course, none of the remaining lizards are brave enough to point this out, so we feel obligated to step in.

First though, we should note that the LGF Page in question links to a Salon article which cites Georgetown professor John Esposito as the expert on these terms. It is noteworthy because Esposito has been featured on the swamp’s front page as well (15 times in total*, by Boiler Room’s count):

Hey, that’s a link to FrontPageMag! Classic.

Anyway, the point is that, reading the LGF archives, one gets the impression that it isn’t Esposito who should be considered to be an expert on these Arabic terms, but rather Charles Johnson. After all, every one of those terms appear in the LGF tag storm (in one form or another):

Add those up, and there are 1,024 front page articles for just those tags. Or, just use Google:

Also see: SFZ’s History Lesson, and Holiday Gift

*3985_Apologist_for_Militant_Islam
4250_Apologists_in_Academia
13975_Islamophobias_Big_Day_at_the_UN
14067_About_Tariq_Ramadan
14413_Diana_West_on_Root_Causes
14437_The_Greatest_Intelligence_Failure_of_the_Iraq_War
20159_Bawer-_Crisis_in_Europe
23095_Georgetown_University_Joins_the_Ummah
25832_New_York_Times_Notices_Jihad_Immediately_Goes_into_Whitewash_Mode
27895_Emerson-_Jerseys_Counterterror_Farce
29517_WaPo-Newsweek_Promoting_CAIR_Again
29565_Kramer-_Dr._Esposito_and_the_Seven-Percent_Solution
29625_Rubin-_Could_There_Be_an_Islamic_Revolution_in_Turkey
30468_Bawer-_The_Times_It_Aint_A-Changin
30613_Judge_Orders_Islamic_Jihad_Terrorist_Freed_on_Bond

Update: I forgot at least one tag from the cloud: Sudden Jihad Syndrome

Advertisements

Charles tries to deflect from the Tweet Wars

Charles has been busted for inflating his tweet counts. Rather than own up to it, he deflects. He takes Republican retweets mocking the Democrats and turns it into an outrage.

Charles Johnson is trying to create a scandal where none exists. The fake Brahman is acting as if he still has relevance to influence events.  Charles is no one to point fingers over anything related to twitter.


The Sage of Culver City projects

Charles loves to project his thoughts. Here he describes his opinion on Internet Explorer.

Are you describing yourself Charles?