Cato Speaks

A little “birdy” sent us this letter that Cato sent Charles. It has been authenticated.

So, let me get this straight, Charles:

On the say-so of a “little birdy” [sic] who likes to stalk stalkers, you decide to publicly chastise a long-time former poster for supposedly commenting on a site that lives to mock you.

For this you have zero evidence, other than your will to be aggrieved.

That poster writes to you to clear up a matter that never needed to be aired publicly and to which he cannot publicly respond, and dares to be even mildly exasperated with the situation.

You then issue a butthurt non-apology while whining about “digs” against your goodself.

Whom does that remind one of? Oh, say, maybe…Sarah “I’m the Victim Here” Palin?

And the pathetic sycophant Dark Falcon allows how terrible it is for you to have to endure “cheap shots”. Poor Mr. Johnson.

Honestly, you should be flattered that you are prominent enough, with your weak-tea attempts at punditry on TPM, to merit a parody site of your very own.  Enjoy it while it lasts.

After all this, some might understand if I were to actually “go stalker” and become your sworn enemy. Let me assure you: should that ever happen, it will be under my own proper name and LGF handle, and you will be the first to know of it.

You would probably thrive on that, but sadly, you are just not a big enough target to waste the slings and arrows on.

–          Cato the Elder *

iPhone

P.S. I’m bcc’ing this – to whom is my affair – as insurance against misquotes.

*nic substituted for real name  and real email address by DoD editor


244 Comments on “Cato Speaks”

  1. Bagua says:

    For the record, someone on the Bcc list sent me a copy, it is identical to the one posted here.

  2. I’ve always believed Cato to be a pompous ass myself, but this letter is as good as the best flounces I’ve ever seen. Dare I say, incoming? Cato, no secret that I always thought you the fool, pretending to be what he couldn’t in real life, but you were never vulgar in your attempts to personally insult others. Join the fun over here. Poke some of Charlie’s shit back at him, he so richly deserves it.

  3. Charles wants a new gig says:

    Damn.

    “Poor Mr. Johnson.”

    Coming where they do in that email, those three words pack more sarcasm than the Bible holds prophets.

    Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Cato, lancet to hypocritical boils. Watch and learn.

    • Bagua says:

      I’ve always said Cato was one of the best writers on LGF. He could say in three words what took me three paragraphs.

      • Sharmuta says:

        Not exactly a high bar, but yeah. But then again, you weren’t around in the old days when there were lots and lots of very bright people there, either.

    • Charles wants a new gig says:

      Oh, and the message header: “Star Chamber LGF”! That ought to send a lizard or two over to Wiki.

      Here, Charles, let me save you the effort:

      “The Star Chamber (Latin Camera stellata) was an English court of law that sat at the royal Palace of Westminster until 1641. It was made up of Privy Counsellors, as well as common-law judges, and supplemented the activities of the common-law and equity courts in both civil and criminal matters. The court was set up to ensure the fair enforcement of laws against prominent people, those so powerful that ordinary courts could never convict them of their crimes. Court sessions were held in secret, with no indictments, no right of appeal, no juries, and no witnesses. Evidence was presented in writing. Over time it evolved into a political weapon and became a symbol of the misuse and abuse of power by the English monarchy and courts.”

  4. Whatever says:

    Is birdiemail one of those internet alternatives BB was talking about? Birdies seem to be busier than hamsters these days.

  5. Mandingo Warrior says:

    If his flounce was a splashless triple flip dive into the water for a 9.5, his retort email is a spinning triple back flip swan dive into the pool for a perfect 10.

    Bravo, Cato!

  6. Sharmuta says:

    >> And the pathetic sycophant Dark Falcon allows how terrible it is for you to have to endure “cheap shots”. Poor Mr. Johnson.

    I’m so sorry, Charles.

  7. Opilio says:

    …you are just not a big enough target to waste the slings and arrows on.

    Nice straight line. Any takers?

    • CJ lies says:

      Maybe there’s a joke or two here:

      To be, or not to be: that is the question:
      Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
      The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
      Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
      And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
      No more; and by a sleep to say we end
      The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
      That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
      Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
      To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;
      For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
      When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
      Must give us pause: there's the respect
      That makes calamity of so long life;
      For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
      The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
      The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
      The insolence of office and the spurns
      That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
      When he himself might his quietus make
      With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
      To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
      But that the dread of something after death,
      The undiscover'd country from whose bourn
      No traveller returns, puzzles the will
      And makes us rather bear those ills we have
      Than fly to others that we know not of?
      Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
      And thus the native hue of resolution
      Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,
      And enterprises of great pith and moment
      With this regard their currents turn awry,
      And lose the name of action. - Soft you now!
      The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons
      Be all my sins remember'd.

  8. freetaxeskill says:

    So,

    Who is Charles needs a new gig.?

    So,

    Do we need someone that rancid posting and possible using that to get this blog in trouble with the law dogs?

  9. freetaxeskill says:

    ps

    Charles,

    Your the sorry one and I am not one bit sorry for all the dirty socks hanging out in and around your neck.
    tfk

  10. lmao says:

    Is that the real Sharmuta posting?

  11. sacred ham says:

    Read / savor Cato’s email, then remember that this is how Charles described it:

    He also got in a couple of digs at me in his email, which I’m not so glad to report

    “A couple of digs?” Sure, Chuck, whatever minimizes your butthurt.

    Keep this episode in mind the next time you read Charles’ account of something that “a little birdy” told him.

    • Bagua says:

      Ha! Nope!

      That was Cato’s email AFTER Charles’ made that “couple of digs” comment. I read the first two as they were also Bcc’s to the group, they were entirely polite and didn’t contain a single dig. (Rightly or wrongly.)Just asking Cj to set the record straight that Cato was not posting here.

      It was Charles Johnson lying about the contents that resulted in the third email posted above.

    • Voltaires Crack says:

      I get the sense that this is a follow-up email to Charles, not the original that CJ commented on previously.

  12. freetaxeskill says:

    looks like this blog is going to have to have some sort of way to tell who is who, much to possible for infiltrators to pose as former lgf’s posters and libel the orginal posters

    in my small imput
    sort of do not make it easy for fake trolls

  13. ChenZhen says:

    Yes this post was copied and pasted in its entirety, down to the title, upon request. I was not on said bcc list.

    /before that question comes up

  14. ryannon says:

    Will the real Charles Johnson please stand up?

  15. Bagua says:

    Here is the comment Charles made that resulted in the email above.

    17 Charles Wed, Feb 2, 2011 4:14:42pm

    +17

    Cato the Elder just wrote to me, by the way, and denied that he’s posting at the stalker blog, which I’m glad to report. He also got in a couple of digs at me in his email, which I’m not so glad to report — including an insinuation that I might not correct my earlier statement.

    So here you go, Cato. No need to say thanks, I got the message.

    Cato’s letter ChenZhen posted was dated the next day. I saw the proceeding letters and there were no “digs” of any sort.

    • Charles wants a new gig says:

      Charles refines the art of lying by a few new techniques every day.

      I just wonder how many loozards have the cojones to come over here and see the proof for themselves.

      • Sharmuta says:

        You can’t see all the flattened noses on the window?

      • Bagua says:

        It’s amazing.

        I was also told that when CJ booted Cato he made a comment that Cato had sent him an “angry note” or similar, yet this was just another lie. Cato never sent an email prior to these recent ones.

        This is a typical lie that Charles has used over and over to demonise banned members.

        (Perhaps the boiler room could find that comment.)

  16. Beeduwine says:

    Cato the Elder […] denied that he’s posting at the stalker blog […] [and] insinuat[ed] that I might not correct my earlier statement.

    So here you go, Cato. No need to say thanks […]

  17. Voltaires Crack says:

    Add a ponytail and four chins?

  18. ryannon says:

    Charles wants a new gig :
    Charles refines the art of lying by a few new techniques every day.
    I just wonder how many loozards have the cojones to come over here and see the proof for themselves.

    Probably quite a few, but just as lurkers.

  19. freetaxeskill says:

    Jack Ingram will have a great song/add for H.E.B. grocery store chain on the super bowl Sunday.

    “Can’t spell Texas without H.E.B.”

  20. Sharmuta says:

    Look. A lizard looking at us.

  21. freetaxeskill says:

    Hayes Carll has a new song you tube up.

    “Sin City Social Club.”

    pure count’tree

  22. calo says:

    freetaxeskill :
    Jack Ingram will have a great song/add for H.E.B. grocery store chain on the super bowl Sunday.
    “Can’t spell Texas without H.E.B.”

    Heh – HEB
    I like those boys.
    They promote TX stuff.
    Every week.

  23. Charles wants a new gig says:

    LOL.

    I think Cato’s “insurance against misquotes” policy may be better than he bargained for.

    Meanwhile, Charles, are you insured against mosquitoes?

  24. Voltaires Crack says:

    Heh…a little OT but still related to Johnsontown

    117 LudwigVanQuixote Fri, Feb 4, 2011 1:39:00pm replyquote

    * 2
    * down
    * up
    * report

    The scientific evidence exists in mountains. This is a global issue, everywhere you look on the globe there is evidence of AGW.

    Only suicidal morons ignore the warnings.

    And on that happy thought, good Shabbos.

    • Whatever says:

      Which mountains?

      • Voltaires Crack says:

        It’s his only comment for that article and not in response to any others.

        He’s trying to sound like a scientific Psalmist.

      • Formercorpsman says:

        The suicidal moron mountains bitch, come on.

      • Whatever says:

        Oh, I thought he was talking about the Fox News gutterslut’s boobs.

      • Formercorpsman says:

        Now lets now get off track here, billions hang in the balance.

        (mumbling to myself, I am rubber you are glue evil fox slut of the gutter, homina, homina, homina)

    • freetaxeskill says:

      odd that post, I had a sock on line from Calif. and was letting cj know about it over on blogmogracy, and some how that one lasted as the last post for a long long time, is it still the last post on that thread, I think that cj was attempting to locate that sock, he does not have any idea who the 6 or 8 are, some of them I just have others log on for me and lurk, two of them talk to Ludwigged out some.

      tfk is playing cat and rats with them

  25. freetaxeskill says:

    WELL, well, then, if there are lots of fakes here that does seem a little like the orginal blog to me.

  26. sacred ham says:

    Chuck is smarter than we give him credit for. He’s posted one of his “I just re-lotioned my jQuery, after pooping an extra-big Ajax this morning, and would you like to hear how much I hate IE again?” posts. If he’s trying to drive off non-worshipers and “stalkers,” that’ll do it. Now he needs to tweet it with #dontfuckingcare and #fatblogmasterwankfest.

    • Whatever says:

      jQuery, or C. Queery?

    • Charles wants a new gig says:

      I noticed that too. Another look under the hood of the world’s premier site for political debate.

      But we do get this:

      Killgore Trout  
      Fri, Feb 4, 2011 5:38:22pm
      3
      down
      up
      report
      I am feeling like a bit of a dinosaur. I was lucky to get introduced to computers at an early age with the apple II but I’ve been so poor for my adult life that I can’t afford gadgetry. I’ve only spoken on a cell phone once or twice. I spent 15 minutes with an Ipad a few months ago. In a few more years I won’t know how anything works anymore.

      So now we know why he had to eat that kale.

  27. yankintheeu says:

    T wonder what the current “Lizards” think of this phenomenon of Charles’ checking on whether LGF registered users are posting at sites critical of him (or if one of his creepy sycophants makes a report to him), and then banning anyone if he catches them. I mean, that is quite neurotic — and sad — behavior.

    • sacred ham says:

      You’re saying that he’s allowing people who think to register? I thought they had some sort of test they administered to newly registered lizards that weeded those types out before they could cause any trouble…

      • yankintheeu says:

        It does appear that under the new progressive regime called ‘LGF’ he has found some who embrace his bizarre tyrant issues. As long as he keeps reviling and smearing the “wingnuts,” from a perspective that once vocally supported Giuliani, they are quite content to clap with approval when some guy gets nuked for an honest disagreement or for some mild criticism of the site.

    • beeduwine says:

      I do not accept the premise of your question, i.e. use of the word ‘think’.

    • song_and_dance_man says:

      If would seem all newbies have to cite a half-assed oath of allegiance. Or at least that is implied it you happened to lurk there and decided to jump headlong into the swamp.

      • Charles wants a new gig says:

        What ought to bother them is the implicit lifelong loyalty oath and nondisclosure agreement that Charrulz seems to think participation over there implies.

      • yankintheeu says:

        Hence the accurate description of the community there in the NY Times article as a “cult.”

      • Carolina Girl as Arachne says:

        And these are grownups we’re talking about. I wouldn’t let a good FRIEND tell me where to go and what I should do. No way I’d let a Cheetos-smacking has-been run my life.

    • Voltaires Crack says:

      If Pr0n counts, than Obdicut is quaking in his spats.

  28. Bagua says:

    Off to see a show. Mock on!

  29. Speranza says:

    I am not a fan of Cato’s (to say the least) but I give him credit – he can really give the shit to Chuckles.

  30. Speranza says:

    lmao :
    Is that the real Sharmuta posting?

    No. Check the avatar and see who has a similar one.

  31. freetaxeskill says:

    little green fakes

  32. freetaxeskill says:

    think someone needs to see if that web site name has been taken,

    http://www.littlegreenfakes.com

    and lgf.com and mess with them with that

  33. freetaxeskill says:

    This thing with the Trident nukes and Obama and the Russian nuke treaty.

    Russia views NATO as just U.S. not a seperate deal, so they got bambie to cut a deal with them that covered all of NATO seems to me.

    If I were any NATO member I would kick the U.S. out of NATO until the U.S. got rid of Obama.

    like that

  34. freetaxeskill says:

    Seems clear to me and it should be clear to all members of NATO that Obama will hand off all their info to the Russians and or the ones of China just to gain things for him alone. He does not even care if its goof for the U.S.A. let alone NATO.

    like that

  35. ryannon says:

    freetaxeskill :
    think someone needs to see if that web site name has been taken,
    http://www.littlegreenfakes.com
    and lgf.com and mess with them with that

    http://www.littlegreenshitballs.com

    http://www.littlegreendirtballs.com

    http://www.littlegreenfoulballs.com

    etc.

  36. ryannon says:

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    Hmm. Never noticed that before…

  37. livefreeor die says:

    Bravo, Cato.
    Bravo!
    You have achieved the perfect “right back at you” with Charles and hit all key pressure points.
    I am in awe.

  38. Charles wants a new gig says:

    The thing is, Charrulz will studiously ignore the very existence of this letter. He can’t lie about it because of the bcc’s, he can’t acknowledge it because people would read it and laugh at him (I mean, “your weak-tea attempts at punditry on TPM” – zing!), and if the loozards know what’s good for them, they’ll pretend it never happened.

    Compare and contrast with the glee with which he jumps on the chance to crank up some outrage and sympathy over the “stalkers” and their evil ways – as long as he thinks his mark can’t fight back.

    Chump. Coward. Cretin. Charles!

  39. GrandJunctionite says:

    Now that Dark Falcon can read what CTE sent to Chuck, it will be interesting to see if he has the stones to post a comment about it and respond.

    No way he does it.

  40. guy says:

    a fun bit of minutia about this childish “little birdie” nonsense…

    http://littlegreenfootballs.com/showc/76/8835410

    i quote:

    “The last time I visited the site (several months ago), every other post and comment was directed to me as if I were reading it.”

    this is like the old one in which he said “I used to doubt that there really were climate change denialists” four days after confessing, to no one’s amazement, “I was also a “skeptic” for a long time…,” except this example of doublethink is enclosed in a single sentence.

  41. swamprat says:

    Ahh. That was a good letter.

    Cato, that site is now the worse for you having left.

    I’m sure you have lowered the average I.Q. of its participants by a significant percentage.

    • swamprat says:

      swamprat :Ahh. That was a good letter.
      Cato, that site is now the worse for you having left.
      I’m sure you have lowered the average I.Q. of its participants by a significant percentage by leaving them to press on without your curmudgeonly, intelligent commentary.

  42. lmao says:

    Formercorpsman :
    This is the same bitch who talked about how great it was to dine in France, and traverse the souks of the middle east.

    Yes, and as I recall paid mucho dinero for a set of pots and pans. Don’t fall for that poor crap. Weren’t his parents working overseas or something. I guess with most of the old people gone he can make up a story about his life.

    • Formercorpsman says:

      He can try. I have no doubts he probably has nothing now. Prototypical of the usual suspect who pursues graduate level education in some idiotic field, votes along lines that not only kills off regular jobs which in turn affect his vocation, but also winds up making him vulnerable to what he is bitching about now.

      Head. meet. sand.

  43. livefreeor die says:

    So far at the swamp, there is no mention of Cato or his letter.
    However, we might want to clean out a DoD cubby for brooklynred who is getting piled on.

    • Charles wants a new gig says:

      If there are any deleted comments, they probably referred to this.

      But the villagers are trained not to say anything that makes the sheriff look stupid. Bad for their health. Yes, very bad indeed.

    • GrandJunctionite says:

      They are too busy devouring their own. The last 10 or so left that is.

      59 brookly red Fri, Feb 4, 2011 6:56:38pm -1
      down
      up
      report

      re: #47 recusancy
      What have we gotten back from you since you’ve cashed all your unemployment checks?
      fuck you asshole… I got cut off long ago. Now I live off of intelligent decisions I made in the past while I was working. Sorry but take your hate elsewhere.

    • snowcrash says:

      Don’t know if brookly would show up here but he fought the good fight for much longer than most people would. If he gets the boot I hope he isn’t disappointed when his LGF “friends” pile on and trash him.

  44. OldLineTexan says:

    Speranza :I am not a fan of Cato’s (to say the least) but I give him credit – he can really give the shit to Chuckles.

    IMO, they’re perfect for each other.

  45. garycooper says:

    The scientific evidence
    Exists in mountains
    This is a global issue
    Everywhere you look
    On the globe
    Over there! Here is evidence of AGW

    Only suicidal morons ignore the warnings
    Open your eyes to the lunatic skies
    All is red destruction
    Sun-rising morning
    Ayers take warming
    Billions are swarming
    To the sea!

    And on that happy thought, good Shabbos! 🙂

  46. livefreeor die says:

    Nice long discussion of marijuana going on at the swamp.
    Doesn’t pot contribute to global warming?

  47. Internet Septic Tank Engineer says:

    As this has turned into a gardening thread, there is lots of good stuff in the Diary of Daedalus archives for those of you who are recent visitors.

    http://diaryofdaedalus.com/2010/11/19/kilgores-fall-harvest/#comments

    This was a discussion we had about kale. I hope the efforts of the LGF gardening community to grow marijuana have more success.

    Somehow, I don’t think they will…. 😉

  48. What stunned me was when I learned — and somebody just told me this today — that CJ forbade any LGF member from posting anywhere else. So as I understand it, you couldn’t be a Lizard in good standing and also, for example, have a Red State diary or something like that.

    Is that TRUE? Or did I misunderstand? Because if it was like that, they should change it from LGF to WTF.

    • Bagua says:

      It is true and well documented. There are countless examples of people being banned for posting at blogs declared unfriendly, which is just about every other blog.

      • MrPaulRevere says:

        It was usually one of his attack dogs who pointed it out to CJ, although he would frequently make the point himself. The attack dog would post “I saw you posting over at JohnDoe.com, whats up with that”?. Johnson would then chime in with his standard warning, “By posting there its obvious you no longer value your LGF account”. If the offender did not apologize, they were banned.

    • Bunk X says:

      There are a few exceptions allowed. Lizard Kilgore Trout was allowed to post blatantly racist rants on Hot Air in the early morning hours just to provide evidence that the admins at Hot Air were racist. Lizards Obdicut and Dark_Falcon go on similar forays. (Hell, Obdicut even tried to pressure Wikipedia admins to let him rewrite the Charles Johnson/Little Green Footballs entry from an “unbiased viewpoint.”)

      Most of the others are forbidden to post on sites deemed by Charles Johnson to be verboten, and if they’re caught, they’re often banned from his site in absentia without comment. They’re not allowed to link directly to those sites either for risk of banishment. Bizarre.

      Charles also collects,tracks and blocks IP addresses of those who criticize him. This has been documented here and elsewhere. WTF is right.

    • Briareus says:

      Welcome to The Boiler Room.

    • trebob says:

      I was banned from LGF two hours after I posted here for the first time. No word from Charles, he just blocked my account.

      WTF indeed.

    • Whatever says:

      The policy was explicitly stated. To former lizard “occasional reader”. There’s a thread about it here somewhere, I think. It was certainly discussed and documented.

      • Charles wants a new gig says:

        Here you go:

        CJ: Jimmah, I noticed that you got some flak for pointing out that ‘goddessoftheclassroom’ was posting comments at the stalker blog, so I wanted to let you know that I appreciate the heads-up. I want to know if someone with an LGF account is posting comments at a blog run by psychos — it means they cannot be trusted and their accounts should be blocked… When a lizard goes rogue, please let me know.

        http://littlegreenfootballs.com/showc/819/7206884

      • Whatever says:

        That “cannot be trusted” ditty is kind of illuminating, too. Johnson could give paranoia lessons to Nixon.

      • snowcrash says:

        When Lizards Go Bad. Starring GOTC as the rogue lizard. ROFL

    • ISpeakJive says:

      You’ve not heard him bragging about his “correlator tool” that can supposedly tell if a poster has strayed off the farm? And also, Chuck asking Barrett Brown for the IP address of one of the commenters on Barrett’s blog that was talking (no death threat or anything) about him? He’s also banned people for posting at Correspondence Committee, a blog set-up for ex-lizards, that specifically prohibited any talk of LGF so old lizards could talk to current lizards. He banned them anyway. If he could prevent lizards from e-mailing each other somehow, I’m sure he’d do it. The guy’s a loon.

  49. Briareus says:

    Formercorpsman :

    The suicidal moron mountains bitch, come on.

    😀 Nominated for La Meilleure Citation Du Jour.

  50. ryannon says:

    Briareus :

    Formercorpsman :
    The suicidal moron mountains bitch, come on.

    Nominated for La Meilleure Citation Du Jour.

    We need a rotating title feature!

  51. Daedalus says:

    Hey Gordon you little Barbarian.

    Enjoy this video of my Serbs Cousins beating up your beloved Arabs.

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGkmnU8POto&feature=related

    Hey little wasp, come out and play!

    • Charles wants a new gig says:

      Koranimals and Christianimals can all fuck each other in hell. And you should really tone down the cousin-love, crunk, or your progeny will all be harelipped wonders too brainless to breathe on their own.

      • beeduwine says:

        You don’t believe in The Man In The Sky, but you do believe in hell. How atonal of you.

      • Charles wants a new gig says:

        Um, playing with nonexistent things on the web does not mean one believes in them. Wuh-duh.

      • beeduwine says:

        Fine. I guess that goes for anything you scribble then.

      • PeteP says:

        What exactly is a Christianimal? I know Koranimal was an lgf term used to describe Muslim terrorists motivated by the Koran.
        You’re really better off posting that crap at lgf or PuffHo.

        Personally, I think you’re full of shit. Very little of what you post here has anything to do with the topic at hand and I would have banned losers like you long ago.

  52. Overlook says:

    I am still not Cato. I thought I had done my job for the day, then this comes up. I fear it is beginning to be too demanding.

    Fapping Cato. Flaunting his Cato authenticity in an email to Dear Leader. I, I, I. I do this. I don’t do that. All in idiomatic English. No German. Feisty. Gets in a good trademark Palin jab. Full nic sign off. Shameless.

    I cannot continue not being Cato if Cato appears where he claims he never is. Two people cannot be in the same empty space simultaneously. I’ve a good mind to email Dear Leader to ask if the post of not being Cato is open over at his place, and if so, could he mention my inquiry in a post, as I can’t post directly, being banned.

    I am considering going part time.

  53. ryannon says:

    Daedalus :
    Hey Gordon you little Barbarian.
    Enjoy this video of my Serbs Cousins beating up your beloved Arabs.
    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGkmnU8POto&feature=related
    Hey little wasp, come out and play!

    Hey, do any of you guys have any good torture videos? Cats, dogs, the handicapped or mentally deficient? Hell, even a snuff movie will do! All races and religions accepted, as long as the vids are truly vomit-producing!

  54. Daedalus says:

    Real Rap!

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TN-kDEKxF0

  55. Daedalus says:

    Good era!

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0DUFjcHGO8

  56. Daedalus says:

    to anyone who has problem with me.
    Fuck you!

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJC2ax18oQM

  57. ryannon says:

    Daedalus :
    to anyone who has problem with me.
    Fuck you!
    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJC2ax18oQM

    No problem wit you, Dawg, you da shizzle! You and me gonna cap some asses fo’ sure! Down wit ya’, homie!

  58. ryannon says:

    nil :
    This is my current fave:
    teletubbies get killed
    Ten year old kid turned me on to it.

    It’s about time. I always thought they were Scientology plants anyway.

    • nil says:

      I’ll never forget the first time I stayed home with a kid and the Teletubbies came on and I was like WTF are these things supposed to be???!?!? I’m still not entirely sure, but now the kids are old enough to only want to heap derision on them, Dora, Barney, etc. Actually the pre-teen kid urban legend re Barney is that he’s in jail for using a bad word on TV, LOL.

  59. XXXX, Cato the Elder, is beneath contempt. He is responsible for some of Johnson’s most vicious smears and defamation of me and others. If any decent human being ever has the misfortune of being in his company, he should flee immediately.

    • Grimcargo says:

      What you said Robert. The man is vile trash.

    • Coldwarrior as Alcibiates says:

      agreed.

    • garycooper says:

      Agreed. I haven’t forgotten his year+ of sycophancy while Chunky purged his site of intelligence. He was right in there, like one of the guards at Dachau. Okay, Dachau is a little bit of an exaggeration…let’s say, Bergen-Belsen.

      • ISpeakJive says:

        Yeah, his politics changed right along with Charles. I don’t blame him if he doesn’t want to be seen in public now,because he’s probably ashamed at what a sell-out he turned out to be. I would be.

    • Doppelganger says:

      watch out, the self appointed blog police will get you!

    • Macha says:

      Surprised to see someone’s real name posted here. Perhaps everyone knows it already (I didn’t) but it is a no class thing to do on a blog, even if you revile someone. I know you won’t give a rat’s ass, but my opinion of you, Mr. Spenser, just dropped by quite a few points.

    • Bagua says:

      Robert Spencer is just like Charles Johnson, following his opponents around the internet, posting their real names. Spencer is a massive liar, a dishonest smear merchant, and what Cato said about this shithead Spencer was true.

      As to Cato, those that want to hate him are welcome to their own opinions. I’ve only spoken out against true stalker behaviour. It is especially cowardly that people who post under anonymous nics out the real names of people who prefer to remain anonymous.

      We lose any claim to be better than LittleGreenFootballs when we imitate the bad behaviour over there. I realise that there are people who are not clever enough to mock and be funny, so they default to insults. Pathetic.

      • beeduwine says:

        Wow. That first paragraph… Out of character.

      • Whatever says:

        Not only that, paragraph 3 criticizes paragraph 1.

      • Doppelganger says:

        Calling somebody a shithead isn’t an insult I guess because that would mean you aren’t clever enough to mock and be funny.

        I can understand, as Cato’s number 1 apologist here, that you might be a bit hysterical right now.

        It’s OK. I’m sure you won’t reply to me with an unsult, since you are clever and all

      • snowcrash says:

        Must be quite a backstory in this feud. I am glad I missed it. I do not think Spencer is anything like Johnson. You need to prove that to me because I haven’t seen it.

      • Grimcargo says:

        Robert Spencer does great work. What do you do? I think you are full of shit and you prove it daily. PS Anyone who defends a vile despicable pos like Cato is a vile pos himself.

      • Charles wants a new gig says:

        Robert Spencer does great work as Pamela Geller’s Svengali. This fact is indisputable.

      • Bagua says:

        Grimcargo, I expect no better of you. I’ve never seen you post a funny or clever message.

      • Bagua says:

        Following people around the internet just to post the real names of people who post under anonymous nics is stalker behaviour. Robert Spencer does this elsewhere as well. We don’t do it here, they do do it a LGF.

      • snowcrash says:

        Cwang in #184, Robt Spencer did great work in a weekly series of blog posts for HotAir called blogging the Quran. It was a while back. No one knew about Islam or what was in their holy book. In those days there was cross pollination betw. HotAir and LGF. That is how I found LGF and probably many others too.

      • Scrat says:

        Robert Spencer does this elsewhere as well.

        Prove it.

      • PeteP says:

        One of the worst comments I’ve read here.

        Spencer does great work informing the public on the Islamic threat while real shitheads, like Johnson, try to silence him through lies and smears. And you’ve given no examples to prove that Spencer does what you’re alleging.

        And vile characters like Cato are not worth defending.

    • passionate conservative says:

      Mr. Spencer, I cannot agree more. Just because Cato and Charlie the dancing clown are having a pi$$ing match doesn’t mean we have to choose sides. Sometimes the enemy of my enemy is NOT my friend, merely a fractured enemy that may attack on two sides, much like Germany and the USSR did to Poland.

  60. Grimcargo says:

    Internet Septic Tank Engineer :
    Good, it is about time we got some hot chicks in here!
    (Even if Brookly is a guy we can still make him wear a little red dress on Fridays.)

    I take it that means you’ve not seen some of the ladies here at DOD and also at Blogmocracy…..I could name the bunch but that might stop you from doing your own research. (sooner or later ugly on the inside effects the outside.Lizardwomen)

  61. Speranza says:

    Robert Spencer :
    XXXX, Cato the Elder, is beneath contempt. He is responsible for some of Johnson’s most vicious smears and defamation of me and others. If any decent human being ever has the misfortune of being in his company, he should flee immediately.

    I saw you the other day on Hannity regarding Michael Scheuer. I would have ripped him an even bigger ass.

    • PeteP says:

      Yes, well done Robert, I saw you on Glenn Beck. Micheal Scheuer is beneath contempt and you certainly put him back in his place.

    • Nesoi says:

      Ah yes,
      Robert Spencer is in the house.
      He deserves praise for re-outing Cato here.
      Excuse me for not being a Spencer groupie./

  62. Pig says:

    I gotta do this just to stay logged in. I think the admins are going all Charley and trying to get rid of me.

  63. trebob says:

    Pig :
    First porn…..then fixing browsers and such.

    Finally, someone with their priorities in the right place.

    8)

  64. Bagua says:

    Doppelganger :
    Calling somebody a shithead isn’t an insult I guess because that would mean you aren’t clever enough to mock and be funny.
    I can understand, as Cato’s number 1 apologist here, that you might be a bit hysterical right now.
    It’s OK. I’m sure you won’t reply to me with an unsult, since you are clever and all

    No, you are right. I shouldn’t have called him a shithead. I was angry.

    What Spencer did is vile and deserves pointing out, he came here to derail the thread and stab at someone he stalks. He could have made his point using the nic like everyone else, but his agenda was to connect the real name.

  65. Macha says:

    PeteP :
    So Macha, it’s OK to post with a fake name but not someone’s their real name? And what exactly did Spencer say that made you lower your opinion of him? Sorry, but I see nothing wrong at all with Spencer’s comment.

    He gave Cato’s real name along with his nic. Whether of not everyone already knew, isn’t the issue. I for one, didn’t know, and perhaps others didn’t. IMO it is not OK to do that to anyone. If someone wants to out themselves, that is their business, but for someone else to do it, NO, not appropriate.

    • snowcrash says:

      Agree. Spencer used Cato’s real name to get in a jab. Unworthy of him as he could have made his point using the nic Cato without the passive aggressive crap. Digging thru the internets looking for name cross references is real stalker behavior. That is how Cato, savage, song and dance man, rodan and ChenZhen got outed. None of it is appropriate.

    • Grimcargo says:

      Where were you when Bloated Bovine posted Roden and Savage’s real name and photo.

      • Doppelganger says:

        laughing at Rodan and savage probably, as they were outed by that skank medaura and her wimp husband

    • you either missed or are ignoring the responses above which state the cato outted himself by posting a link to a newspaper article that used his real name and a picture of him and said “this is me! look at me!”.

      • snowcrash says:

        Kirly, did Cato post it or did some one put two and two together after doing some digging? I’m not defending Cato but I don’t want someone finding me on facebook or twitter and tying that to my nic and then saying AHA you outed yourself, you put the info out there! That is what Johnson did to Rodan,savage, song and dance and Chen.

      • Whatever says:

        Kirly’s right. Cato linked it directly to one of his comments. No inference necessary.

      • snow, he did it himself.
        thanks Whatever.

  66. Grimcargo says:

    Bagua :
    Grimcargo, I expect no better of you. I’ve never seen you post a funny or clever message.

    Did somebody die and make you the judge of what is to be posted. I could care less what you expect of me. As you can see. Your chastising has absolutely no effect on anyone. You defend some indefensible filth and then call out people for less. You are nuts.

    • Bagua says:

      Of course you could care less, you have low standards.

      • Grimcargo says:

        Let’s look at it this way.I have low standards according to you. Imagine how low that makes you, since me with my low standards think you are a piece.of.shit. And an enabler of trash. Which makes you trash. I am sure others have noticed how you pretend to take the high ground until you are ready to sling your barbs.You want to be on the BCC of every subjects.Once again….You are in the same category as Cato…know what I mean.

      • beeduwine says:

        My standards are as low as they come too.

        Grim, let’s gather the low-moralers and go for a beer. I’m buying. Or we could, more in line with our characters, turn it up a notch and go for a beer’n’dash.

      • Persephonexoxo says:

        As the resident blog police officer, was that comment really necessary? For someone who claims to be so above it all, that insult was low. Welcome to the gutter. Surprise, you are no better than those you hassle on here.

  67. Grimcargo :

    Bagua :Grimcargo, I expect no better of you. I’ve never seen you post a funny or clever message.

    Did somebody die and make you the judge of what is to be posted. I could care less what you expect of me. As you can see. Your chastising has absolutely no effect on anyone. You defend some indefensible filth and then call out people for less. You are nuts.

    you’re right Grimcargo. the poster has set himself up and apart and above the rest of us as the blog police. ignoring it is the best choice, imo.

    for the record, i’ve seen you post plenty of funny comments and i enjoy them and i know others do as well – their responses to them are the clear evidence.

  68. Overlook says:

    How about putting up a thread for discussion on the right to anonymity of blog commenters? Why do we think it important to protect true identities? Can a commenter forfeit that right were he to reveal his true identity? Is fear of violence a credible reason to protect the right? After all, blog owners frequently blog in their own names? Do people cling to anonymity because they do not want their opinions or blogging persona tied to them out of fear of, what, ridicule? sacking?
    There is something off about proclaiming the sanctity of anonymity.
    Robert Spenser does not lie as far as I know, but if he does, he does so in his own name.

  69. Persephonexoxo says:

    And for the record, I was at LGF when Cato posted a link to the article about him. He was bitching because he couldn’t bring his service dog to court with him. He. Outted. Himself.

    • Bagua says:

      Grimcargo :
      Having reading comprehension? The name was xxxx out. Prove the stalking by Spencer….

      Not too bright are we? The name was x’d out by the admins after the fact.

      • Grimcargo says:

        Bagworm. Yeah the name was xxx out…but the fact is…you were trying to use that as proof that Spencer is a stalker. you are full of shit. And you can’t follow the discussion. Same request Bagworm.Prove the stalking you accused Spencer of doing. You cannot prove it and that’s why you talk out of both sides of your mouth. Truth is..you are a liar.An enabler of trash….liar.

      • Bagua says:

        The name was xx’d out after my complaint, fool. By the admins here. Stop frothing at the mouth and pay attention.

        But I’m not interested in a flame war with an imbecile. You really think flinging a bunch of schoolyard insults is making a killer point? You’re pathetic. Now calm down.

      • Grimcargo says:

        Bagworm..still won’t put up the proof that you claim Spencer is stalking your piece of filth Cato. You can dance around it all you want but you won’t prove it. Prove it you lying piece of filth. You are showing your self to all who read here. All you have to do is prove what you claim. I m sick of lying bastards like you.

  70. Grimcargo says:

    beeduwine
    February 6, 2011 at 5:20 pm | #222 Quote
    My standards are as low as they come too.
    Grim, let’s gather the low-moralers and go for a beer. I’m buying. Or we could, more in line with our characters, turn it up a notch and go for a beer’n’dash.

    Beed you’re a good guy. I must not be. Because if I could gather anybody, it’d not be to go for a beer. Beer can’t fix this.

  71. Grimcargo says:

    Internet Septic Tank Engineer :
    Oh oh….
    That is like a Redneck saying “Hey Bubba, watch this!”

    I am sure you would know.

  72. Internet Septic Tank Engineer says:

    Grimcargo :

    Internet Septic Tank Engineer :
    Oh oh….
    That is like a Redneck saying “Hey Bubba, watch this!”

    I am sure you would know.

    Yes I do and I rate it just slightly below Baldrick saying “I have a cunning plan”

    However I was pandering to a wider audience as Baldrick is not very well known.