Home > Animal Farm Lunacy, Charles "Icarus" Johnson, Little Green Footballs > Stinky Beaumont does a pro-NSA thread

Stinky Beaumont does a pro-NSA thread

September 17, 2013

is the Obama Loyalist’s alter ego. In the old days, Stinky would be the nick Charles used to ban people. Claiming he was testing a new feature, Charles posted a thread under his slinky sock puppet defending the NSA.

Stinky

Here is Charles explaining the new feature he is testing.

Stinky 2

Charles has some serious issues.

About these ads
  1. Bunk X
    September 17, 2013 at 11:33 am | #1

    In other news:
    Australian Wild Pig Drinks 18 Beers, Gets in Fight with Cow

    http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/3981/20130914/australian-wild-pig-drinks-18-beers-gets-fight-cow.htm

  2. Octopus
    September 17, 2013 at 11:46 am | #2

    Of course, the chief architect of Obamacare, Democrat Max Baucus, is heading for the high ground of retirement to avoid the fallout of the coming train wreck: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/23/dem-sen-max-baucus-wont-seek-reelection-in-2014/

  3. rightymouse
    September 17, 2013 at 12:05 pm | #3

    LGF’s view counter still looks screwed up. Over 4500 views on that piece of crap? Such a laff riot. :lol:

    • Arachne
      September 17, 2013 at 1:03 pm | #4

      Should be in the billions by lunchtime. But he’s still unplugged from the monitoring sites, isn’t he? So that he can “hide the decline.”

  4. Octopus
    September 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm | #5

    rightymouse :
    LGF’s view counter still looks screwed up. Over 4500 views on that piece of crap? Such a laff riot.

    Seriously…the guy has no shame. He just makes it up as he goes. :lol:

    #nowplaying > Desperately Hip > Indie Stunner > Jazzy Snooze lgf.bz/omyakona55

  5. Octopus
    September 17, 2013 at 12:37 pm | #6

    “The Art Of War” not really about war…overwhelming scientific consensus…why this salmon so cold and hard? :?

    • Arachne
      September 17, 2013 at 1:02 pm | #7

      When asked, Greenwald replied “oh that guy. My stalker.”

  6. Zeus Crankypants
    September 17, 2013 at 12:44 pm | #8

    Of course all the checks and balances at the NSA prevented Snowden from downloading an encyclopedias worth of information.

    Charles… your actual computer skills and knowledge has never graduated from your little Apple Lisa.

    • ISpeakJive
      September 17, 2013 at 2:08 pm | #9

      Those nice NSA people would never do such a thing. Just like those nice people at the IRS.

  7. rightymouse
    September 17, 2013 at 2:03 pm | #10

    You tell ‘em big boy!!! :roll:

    • OLT’s There’s a PhD In There For Someone
      September 17, 2013 at 2:11 pm | #11

      What is the clinical name for this strange disconnect he has from his own behavior?

      Honestly, it’s fascinating.

      • Octopus
        September 17, 2013 at 2:51 pm | #12

        “Blind Projection,” is my diagnosis.

      • livefreeor die
        September 17, 2013 at 10:23 pm | #13

        Lack of insight.

    • Arachne
      September 17, 2013 at 2:11 pm | #14

      In the hands of Fatass – ALWAYS a smear tactic.

    • rightymouse
      September 17, 2013 at 2:19 pm | #15

      It’s a logic fallacy. Red herring.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy

    • September 17, 2013 at 3:18 pm | #16

      uhhhh, wow. This goes under the “you should know” heading. Let’s hear some more about the libertarian anarchist conspiracy against you.

  8. Voltaire’s Crack
    September 17, 2013 at 2:38 pm | #17

    The Prime Minister of Australia eliminated the cabinet position for Minister of Climate Change.

    Outrage?

    • Octopus
      September 17, 2013 at 2:55 pm | #18

      This outrage could be seen as yet another nail in global warming’s coffin, if that particular structure weren’t already more metal than wood.

  9. Octopus
    September 17, 2013 at 2:57 pm | #19

    Blind Projection, Example #549,610.

    • rightymouse
      September 17, 2013 at 3:04 pm | #20

      The man is completely oblivious to his blatant projection. Unbelievable! :shock:

    • September 17, 2013 at 3:20 pm | #21

      Charles is the king of the “label and attack” strategy. Defender! Denier!

  10. OLT’s Obama’s Great Victory Indecision
    September 17, 2013 at 3:30 pm | #22

    From Twitterwarrior:

    “67% of Americans Approve of Obama’s Diplomatic Approach to Syria”

    OMFG, my head is spinning from all the spinning and my own laughter. Maybe if I was a waste of skin glued to a futon it wouldn’t bother me so much. Have you seen my muumuu? I’m going on a Cheeto binge.

    /Can’t beat ‘em so join ‘em

    • trebob
      September 17, 2013 at 4:24 pm | #23

      Again, Charles lies in his headlines. The actual Pew paper says

      “By a 67% to 23% margin, the public approves of Barack Obama’s decision to delay military airstrikes and pursue a diplomatic effort to convince Syria to give up its chemical weapons.”

      OK, I’d argue it wasn’t Obama’s decision to pursue diplomatic channels, rather he was clamoring to bomb ASAP. When he was shot down politically in Congress and then again by Putin, he *decided* to “pursue a diplomatic effort”.

      Still a stretch to say “67% of Americans Approve of Obama’s Diplomatic Approach to Syria”.

    • trebob
      September 17, 2013 at 4:47 pm | #24

      As always, it’s about the way things are phrased. The actual Pew question was:

      PEW.3 As you may know, Barack Obama has said he will delay a decision on military airstrikes to see if Syria can be convinced to give up control of its chemical weapons through diplomatic efforts. Do you approve or disapprove of this new approach?
      Sep 12-15
      2013
      67 Approve
      23 Disapprove
      10 Don’t know/Refused (VOL.)

      But, if we also look at one of the trend comparison questions:

      PEW.4 TREND FOR COMPARISON CONTINUED…
      Would you favor or oppose the U.S. conducting military airstrikes against Syria in response to reports that the Syrian government used chemical weapons? [If favor or oppose] Do you [favor/oppose] very strongly, or not so strongly?

      Sep 4-8
      2013
      28 Favor
      16 Very strongly
      12 Not so strongly
      * Don’t know/Refused (VOL.)
      63 Oppose
      45 Very strongly
      18 Not so strongly
      1 Don’t know/Refused (VOL.)
      9 Don’t know/Refused (VOL.)

      So, a couple of weeks ago 63% opposed military strikes and this week 67% approve of not using military strikes. That isn’t exactly a ringing endorsement of Obama’s foreign policy, yet many news outlets, as well as biased hacks like Charles, are implying just that. They are getting desperate.

  11. OLT’s Obama’s Great Victory Indecision
    September 17, 2013 at 3:44 pm | #25

    BTW, Benghazi is fake but Obama has won a great victory in Syria with diplomacy.

    I’m not sure which part of “diplomacy” was his wobbly attack talk, or which part of victory being bent over and spanked by Vlad the Putin was, but by God it must be true since the Left (and Obama’s boy Stalker Charles) say so.

    • trebob
      September 17, 2013 at 4:51 pm | #26

      We have always been at war with Syria.

  12. dwells38
    September 17, 2013 at 5:09 pm | #27

    Here’s a funny! Ha! Garry Kasparov, genius strategist explains calmly to Larry O’Duncell why O-bomb-uuuh was out-maneuvered, out-thunk and generally outclassed by Putin and Assad on the world stage. America loses but it’s still fun to watch after being lectured for five years how O-bomb-uuuh’s intellect, skills and policies are so super arse-some!!!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=IRjAPSpEzEQ

    Chunk’s own POV on Twitter appears to be very close to LOD’s. He stated he was unclear why this could be a win for Assad. LOL! Penis penis penis!

    • Octopus
      September 17, 2013 at 5:30 pm | #28

      He was unclear, but now he should be crystal. Garry explained it in terms even a dunce-cap model like Fatass must understand. So have a lot of other very bright people, btw…excluding a few Dhimmicrap waterboys, who paint everything as a big win for Unicorn Messiah, no matter how disastrous.

    • The Osprey
      September 17, 2013 at 5:48 pm | #29

      Linky no work. That youtube account has been terminated.

      • Octopus
        September 17, 2013 at 6:00 pm | #30

        I think this is the video Dwells was trying to post:

      • rightymouse
        September 17, 2013 at 6:46 pm | #31

        Good Lord…. :shock:
        You know what they say, that paybacks are a b*tch. Yep.
        Saturday.

      • Octopus
        September 17, 2013 at 9:13 pm | #32

        You know, ‘Mouse, the Bloodhound Gang has a tune that would really teach me a lesson. Features the diminutive of “Richard,” and contains another insult, alluding to a lack of courage. That would really hurt a guy!

  13. Doppel B. DeMilyo
    September 17, 2013 at 5:10 pm | #33

    I wonder if Stinky is friends with Kurt’s demon

  14. beed
    September 17, 2013 at 5:25 pm | #34

    Damn all you reactionary right wing fasscusts. I’m changing sides again. I’m with Charles now. Blow me in the ass.

    “Blow me in the ass” makes no sense to me, Mr.Beed, and I have no idea who Charles is.
    Cordially,
    Mr. Akismet
    Spaminator

  15. beed
    September 17, 2013 at 5:26 pm | #35

    Fuck you fascist loving pigs and your fascist spam filter.

    I can be dickish, but I am not a member of the Democrat Party, Mr.Beed.
    Cordially,
    Mr. Akismet
    Spaminator

  16. beeed
    September 17, 2013 at 5:27 pm | #36

    Screw me in the ass.

    • trebob
      September 17, 2013 at 5:30 pm | #37

      Sideways?

      • dwells38
        September 17, 2013 at 5:37 pm | #38

        No he’s starting a haiku……

        Sideways is the way I like
        Like Ludwig the stud

      • dwells38
        September 17, 2013 at 5:55 pm | #39

        Or maybe the first alt. lyric to the tune of “Fly Me To The Moon”

        Screw me in the ass
        And let me feel that you are hard
        Let me have it all
        Up in my tiny little arse
        You big nerd, pole my ass
        You big geek, baby, screw me

        Fill my butt with schlong
        And let it sting for ever more
        You are long up in me
        All I need, I’m your butt whore
        In other words, I want screwed
        In other words, I love you

        [instrumental-first verse]

        And so on and so forth…

        ASSCLAP, BM I (just had one)

    • Octopus
      September 17, 2013 at 5:32 pm | #40

      beeed :
      Screw me in the ass.

      Only if you’re crying already…

      • beeed
        September 17, 2013 at 5:36 pm | #41

        I have never made love to a crying woman. Well, I have, but only because she was emotional.

      • trebob
        September 17, 2013 at 5:42 pm | #42

        just..can’t..even…. :shock:

    • rightymouse
      September 17, 2013 at 5:39 pm | #43

      Why? :shock:

      • Octopus
        September 17, 2013 at 5:55 pm | #44

        Because Bloodhound Gang. :lol:

      • September 17, 2013 at 6:38 pm | #45

        Not even gonna…

      • rightymouse
        September 17, 2013 at 6:52 pm | #46

        I hope Beed is proud of himself spawning so much musical depravity. :shock:

  17. Octopus
    September 17, 2013 at 5:39 pm | #47

    Stupid fat blob, the American people were against it from the beginning! They recognized it as a desperate move to distract from other failures, with no real goal to justify the risks involved. Now shaddap and suck on your fishsicle, before the weather turns cold.

  18. Octopus
    September 17, 2013 at 6:09 pm | #48

    Chunky’s favorite pro-NSA jam:

    • rightymouse
      September 17, 2013 at 6:39 pm | #49

      Boy! THAT was a walk down memory lane! Thanks!!

      • Octopus
        September 17, 2013 at 9:05 pm | #50

        Heard that on the radio today, and it made me think of the NSA…and how they would NEVER misuse the info they collect. Because it’s against the law, you see. Chunky told me.

  19. JimboXL
    September 17, 2013 at 7:10 pm | #51

    Don’t tell me the lying dim libs are now trying to spin Syria to say that the American people were all for mad Obomber decimating Syria with his peace bombs and now they are ok with not doing it after Obomber got a global smack down from Putin and whimpered for restraint?

    • September 17, 2013 at 7:40 pm | #52

      They like what Obama is doing, no matter what he wants to do, no matter if it’s completely different than before. The majority of the public agrees, and if you are against that opinion, you are a denier whose denial is worse than the denial of the holocaust denial!!!!111!!1!

    • trebob
      September 17, 2013 at 8:03 pm | #53

      Charles may be advising Obama. After Putin pantsed him, Obama leaped out on front of the majority of Americans who were opposed to military action and the sycophants squeal how everyone approves of “Obama’s Policy”.

      The Mouse-ka-mania style algorithm looks something like this:

      1. Obama takes a dump.
      2. Most Americans take a dump.
      3. Americans approve of Obama’s dump.

      (This is only an approximation of the MKM algorithm. Obviously the real thing is sequestered in a backwater section of L.A.)

      • Doppel Milyo Sunday Haiku Service
        September 17, 2013 at 10:15 pm | #54

        In Obama’s America, you don’t take dump.

        Dump takes you

  20. Octopus
    September 17, 2013 at 9:27 pm | #55

    http://www.waitbutwhy.com/2013/09/why-generation-y-yuppies-are-unhappy.html

    This article is so great! I’m sending it to all the younger people I know, who will appreciate it oh so much. :lol:

    The general idea can easily be adapted to the situation young people and libturds find themselves in, vis-a-vis the Unicorn Messiah. Remember the rosy expectations, of a completely unqualified individual with a smooth line of patter? See the reality, now? Sensing a disconnect? Wonder what the frig happened, along the way?

  21. Octopus
    September 17, 2013 at 10:36 pm | #56

    And, water is wet. Gets dark at night. Fish live in water. Gus is in the garage. The vast majority of terrorists nowadays are Muslim.

    • Because Milyo
      September 17, 2013 at 11:04 pm | #57

      IOW, Chuck never got along with pussy.

    • livefreeor die
      September 17, 2013 at 11:05 pm | #58

      Does this mean that Charles is a cat?

      • livefreeor die
        September 17, 2013 at 11:05 pm | #59

        We already knew he was a pussy.

      • poteen2
        September 18, 2013 at 12:14 am | #60

        3 degrees of separation in a newnoun style haiku thingy of settled science;

        Cats are assholes.
        Cats are pussies.
        Charley’s a pussy.
        Ergo,,,,Charley’s an asshole.
        Burma Ballshave

    • September 17, 2013 at 11:17 pm | #61

      Cats are kind of like obese people. Some of them are funny, like Oliver Hardy, Chris Farley, John Belushi, and Lou Costello. But some of them are total assholes, like Michael Moore, Chunky Johnson, and Morgan Spurlock. Oh wait, Morgan Spurlock’s not obese, but he is a piece of shit.

  22. swamprat
    September 17, 2013 at 11:09 pm | #62

    LGF Poll: Do You Back Obama’s Diplomatic Approach to Syria? lgf.bz/16cUOZk 2 hours ago

    1 declare war because a line was crossed
    2 undeclare war because the line wasn’t your line, it was the line drawn by America and the international community
    3 change war to a small strike
    4 but not TOO small of a strike ’cause America dosen’t do pinpricks
    5 through a supposed gaff let Russia be the adult and protect its assets in the process
    6 declare victory

    the economic acumen of Herbert Hoover
    the diplomatic finess of Richard Nixon
    the military genius of Jimmy Carter

    rolled into the Presidential Presence we are honored to call “Obama”

    • Because Milyo
      September 17, 2013 at 11:44 pm | #63

      7. Get off my blog!

  23. Minnow
    September 17, 2013 at 11:36 pm | #64

    Only douchebags use the phrase “Think about it.”

    Hey Fatass, you qualify.

  24. Because Awwwww
    September 17, 2013 at 11:45 pm | #65
  25. Whatever man
    September 18, 2013 at 12:42 am | #66

    Don’t know about you all, but the robot kalushi job in Smolensk sounds sweet.

    Good evening Dear forum users!
    We offer you EMPLOYMENT IN GAZPROM, LUKOIL

    See the offer and fill out an application, visit our website

    Fill out an application for employment

    Thank you!

    http://s006.radikal.ru/i213/1309/96/f1ac3c91174a.jpgработа home on the internet
    job vacancies in Smolensk
    robot kalushі
    jobs on
    looking for work at home

    Robot in sums
    job search
    Work in Finland
    find a job in Ufa
    work without intermediaries
    summer job
    job vacancies in Irkutsk
    Work for students
    job search in Kharkov
    find a job in Novosibirsk
    earnings in interenete
    find a job in Kiev
    work in Khabarovsk
    on what you can earn
    job vacancies in Biisk

  26. Grinning Cat
    September 18, 2013 at 12:51 am | #67

    Oops, the Russian libertarian-teaparty-socialist Greensnow-Putin bots came to bother DoD instead of Charles. Get your yerselves down to the littlegreenfootballs blog, bots! :lol:

  27. Pakimon
    September 18, 2013 at 5:04 am | #68

    EMPLOYMENT IN GAZPROM, LUKOIL and job vacancies in Smolensk, Irkutsk and Biisk?!

    Somebody notify Gus_802!

    This could be a life changing event for him! :lol:

  28. Because Koch Bros
    September 18, 2013 at 10:02 am | #69

    It’s forking Big Oil!!!

Comments are closed.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,190 other followers