Stinky Beaumont does a pro-NSA thread

is the Obama Loyalist’s alter ego. In the old days, Stinky would be the nick Charles used to ban people. Claiming he was testing a new feature, Charles posted a thread under his slinky sock puppet defending the NSA.

Stinky

Here is Charles explaining the new feature he is testing.

Stinky 2

Charles has some serious issues.

About these ads

69 Comments on “Stinky Beaumont does a pro-NSA thread”

  1. Octopus says:

    Of course, the chief architect of Obamacare, Democrat Max Baucus, is heading for the high ground of retirement to avoid the fallout of the coming train wreck: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/23/dem-sen-max-baucus-wont-seek-reelection-in-2014/

  2. rightymouse says:

    LGF’s view counter still looks screwed up. Over 4500 views on that piece of crap? Such a laff riot. :lol:

    • Arachne says:

      Should be in the billions by lunchtime. But he’s still unplugged from the monitoring sites, isn’t he? So that he can “hide the decline.”

  3. Octopus says:

    rightymouse :
    LGF’s view counter still looks screwed up. Over 4500 views on that piece of crap? Such a laff riot.

    Seriously…the guy has no shame. He just makes it up as he goes. :lol:

    #nowplaying > Desperately Hip > Indie Stunner > Jazzy Snooze lgf.bz/omyakona55

  4. Octopus says:

    “The Art Of War” not really about war…overwhelming scientific consensus…why this salmon so cold and hard? :?

  5. Zeus Crankypants says:

    Of course all the checks and balances at the NSA prevented Snowden from downloading an encyclopedias worth of information.

    Charles… your actual computer skills and knowledge has never graduated from your little Apple Lisa.

  6. rightymouse says:

    You tell ‘em big boy!!! :roll:

  7. Voltaire's Crack says:

    The Prime Minister of Australia eliminated the cabinet position for Minister of Climate Change.

    Outrage?

    • Octopus says:

      This outrage could be seen as yet another nail in global warming’s coffin, if that particular structure weren’t already more metal than wood.

  8. Octopus says:

    Blind Projection, Example #549,610.

  9. OLT's Obama's Great Victory Indecision says:

    From Twitterwarrior:

    “67% of Americans Approve of Obama’s Diplomatic Approach to Syria”

    OMFG, my head is spinning from all the spinning and my own laughter. Maybe if I was a waste of skin glued to a futon it wouldn’t bother me so much. Have you seen my muumuu? I’m going on a Cheeto binge.

    /Can’t beat ‘em so join ‘em

    • trebob says:

      Again, Charles lies in his headlines. The actual Pew paper says

      “By a 67% to 23% margin, the public approves of Barack Obama’s decision to delay military airstrikes and pursue a diplomatic effort to convince Syria to give up its chemical weapons.”

      OK, I’d argue it wasn’t Obama’s decision to pursue diplomatic channels, rather he was clamoring to bomb ASAP. When he was shot down politically in Congress and then again by Putin, he *decided* to “pursue a diplomatic effort”.

      Still a stretch to say “67% of Americans Approve of Obama’s Diplomatic Approach to Syria”.

    • trebob says:

      As always, it’s about the way things are phrased. The actual Pew question was:

      PEW.3 As you may know, Barack Obama has said he will delay a decision on military airstrikes to see if Syria can be convinced to give up control of its chemical weapons through diplomatic efforts. Do you approve or disapprove of this new approach?
      Sep 12-15
      2013
      67 Approve
      23 Disapprove
      10 Don’t know/Refused (VOL.)

      But, if we also look at one of the trend comparison questions:

      PEW.4 TREND FOR COMPARISON CONTINUED…
      Would you favor or oppose the U.S. conducting military airstrikes against Syria in response to reports that the Syrian government used chemical weapons? [If favor or oppose] Do you [favor/oppose] very strongly, or not so strongly?

      Sep 4-8
      2013
      28 Favor
      16 Very strongly
      12 Not so strongly
      * Don’t know/Refused (VOL.)
      63 Oppose
      45 Very strongly
      18 Not so strongly
      1 Don’t know/Refused (VOL.)
      9 Don’t know/Refused (VOL.)

      So, a couple of weeks ago 63% opposed military strikes and this week 67% approve of not using military strikes. That isn’t exactly a ringing endorsement of Obama’s foreign policy, yet many news outlets, as well as biased hacks like Charles, are implying just that. They are getting desperate.

  10. OLT's Obama's Great Victory Indecision says:

    BTW, Benghazi is fake but Obama has won a great victory in Syria with diplomacy.

    I’m not sure which part of “diplomacy” was his wobbly attack talk, or which part of victory being bent over and spanked by Vlad the Putin was, but by God it must be true since the Left (and Obama’s boy Stalker Charles) say so.

  11. dwells38 says:

    Here’s a funny! Ha! Garry Kasparov, genius strategist explains calmly to Larry O’Duncell why O-bomb-uuuh was out-maneuvered, out-thunk and generally outclassed by Putin and Assad on the world stage. America loses but it’s still fun to watch after being lectured for five years how O-bomb-uuuh’s intellect, skills and policies are so super arse-some!!!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=IRjAPSpEzEQ

    Chunk’s own POV on Twitter appears to be very close to LOD’s. He stated he was unclear why this could be a win for Assad. LOL! Penis penis penis!

    • Octopus says:

      He was unclear, but now he should be crystal. Garry explained it in terms even a dunce-cap model like Fatass must understand. So have a lot of other very bright people, btw…excluding a few Dhimmicrap waterboys, who paint everything as a big win for Unicorn Messiah, no matter how disastrous.

    • The Osprey says:

      Linky no work. That youtube account has been terminated.

      • Octopus says:

        I think this is the video Dwells was trying to post:

      • rightymouse says:

        Good Lord…. :shock:
        You know what they say, that paybacks are a b*tch. Yep.
        Saturday.

      • Octopus says:

        You know, ‘Mouse, the Bloodhound Gang has a tune that would really teach me a lesson. Features the diminutive of “Richard,” and contains another insult, alluding to a lack of courage. That would really hurt a guy!

  12. Doppel B. DeMilyo says:

    I wonder if Stinky is friends with Kurt’s demon

  13. beed says:

    Damn all you reactionary right wing fasscusts. I’m changing sides again. I’m with Charles now. Blow me in the ass.

    “Blow me in the ass” makes no sense to me, Mr.Beed, and I have no idea who Charles is.
    Cordially,
    Mr. Akismet
    Spaminator

  14. beed says:

    Fuck you fascist loving pigs and your fascist spam filter.

    I can be dickish, but I am not a member of the Democrat Party, Mr.Beed.
    Cordially,
    Mr. Akismet
    Spaminator

  15. beeed says:

    Screw me in the ass.

  16. Octopus says:

    Stupid fat blob, the American people were against it from the beginning! They recognized it as a desperate move to distract from other failures, with no real goal to justify the risks involved. Now shaddap and suck on your fishsicle, before the weather turns cold.

  17. Octopus says:

    Chunky’s favorite pro-NSA jam:

    • rightymouse says:

      Boy! THAT was a walk down memory lane! Thanks!!

      • Octopus says:

        Heard that on the radio today, and it made me think of the NSA…and how they would NEVER misuse the info they collect. Because it’s against the law, you see. Chunky told me.

  18. JimboXL says:

    Don’t tell me the lying dim libs are now trying to spin Syria to say that the American people were all for mad Obomber decimating Syria with his peace bombs and now they are ok with not doing it after Obomber got a global smack down from Putin and whimpered for restraint?

    • Al-Cheezeera says:

      They like what Obama is doing, no matter what he wants to do, no matter if it’s completely different than before. The majority of the public agrees, and if you are against that opinion, you are a denier whose denial is worse than the denial of the holocaust denial!!!!111!!1!

    • trebob says:

      Charles may be advising Obama. After Putin pantsed him, Obama leaped out on front of the majority of Americans who were opposed to military action and the sycophants squeal how everyone approves of “Obama’s Policy”.

      The Mouse-ka-mania style algorithm looks something like this:

      1. Obama takes a dump.
      2. Most Americans take a dump.
      3. Americans approve of Obama’s dump.

      (This is only an approximation of the MKM algorithm. Obviously the real thing is sequestered in a backwater section of L.A.)

  19. Octopus says:

    http://www.waitbutwhy.com/2013/09/why-generation-y-yuppies-are-unhappy.html

    This article is so great! I’m sending it to all the younger people I know, who will appreciate it oh so much. :lol:

    The general idea can easily be adapted to the situation young people and libturds find themselves in, vis-a-vis the Unicorn Messiah. Remember the rosy expectations, of a completely unqualified individual with a smooth line of patter? See the reality, now? Sensing a disconnect? Wonder what the frig happened, along the way?

  20. Octopus says:

    And, water is wet. Gets dark at night. Fish live in water. Gus is in the garage. The vast majority of terrorists nowadays are Muslim.

  21. swamprat says:

    LGF Poll: Do You Back Obama’s Diplomatic Approach to Syria? lgf.bz/16cUOZk 2 hours ago

    1 declare war because a line was crossed
    2 undeclare war because the line wasn’t your line, it was the line drawn by America and the international community
    3 change war to a small strike
    4 but not TOO small of a strike ’cause America dosen’t do pinpricks
    5 through a supposed gaff let Russia be the adult and protect its assets in the process
    6 declare victory

    the economic acumen of Herbert Hoover
    the diplomatic finess of Richard Nixon
    the military genius of Jimmy Carter

    rolled into the Presidential Presence we are honored to call “Obama”

  22. Minnow says:

    Only douchebags use the phrase “Think about it.”

    Hey Fatass, you qualify.

  23. Because Awwwww says:
  24. Whatever man says:

    Don’t know about you all, but the robot kalushi job in Smolensk sounds sweet.

    Good evening Dear forum users!
    We offer you EMPLOYMENT IN GAZPROM, LUKOIL

    See the offer and fill out an application, visit our website

    Fill out an application for employment

    Thank you!

    http://s006.radikal.ru/i213/1309/96/f1ac3c91174a.jpgработа home on the internet
    job vacancies in Smolensk
    robot kalushі
    jobs on
    looking for work at home

    Robot in sums
    job search
    Work in Finland
    find a job in Ufa
    work without intermediaries
    summer job
    job vacancies in Irkutsk
    Work for students
    job search in Kharkov
    find a job in Novosibirsk
    earnings in interenete
    find a job in Kiev
    work in Khabarovsk
    on what you can earn
    job vacancies in Biisk

  25. Grinning Cat says:

    Oops, the Russian libertarian-teaparty-socialist Greensnow-Putin bots came to bother DoD instead of Charles. Get your yerselves down to the littlegreenfootballs blog, bots! :lol:

  26. Pakimon says:

    EMPLOYMENT IN GAZPROM, LUKOIL and job vacancies in Smolensk, Irkutsk and Biisk?!

    Somebody notify Gus_802!

    This could be a life changing event for him! :lol:

  27. Because Koch Bros says:

    It’s forking Big Oil!!!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,244 other followers